Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E903 Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E903 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E903 Questions]

A marketing team determines that in the future, their projects must be reviewed by the Project Sponsor before the project is closed. What is the best practice to ensure that each project is properly reviewed and approved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best practice is to incorporate an approval process into the project template so that it is automatically triggered when a project reaches the completion stage. This ensures consistency and saves time by removing the need to manually set up approval processes for each new project. This approach also guarantees that the Project Sponsor's review is systematically included before the project is officially closed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Elbert
10 months ago
I agree with Mila, option C makes more sense because it ensures consistency across all projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
10 months ago
Option C for the win! This way, we don't have to worry about setting up approval processes manually. It's all taken care of in the template.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
9 months ago
Junita: Exactly, it's a proactive approach to project management that can help prevent any oversight or delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
10 months ago
It definitely streamlines the process and reduces the risk of projects being closed without proper review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
10 months ago
I agree, having the approval process already set up in the project template saves time and ensures consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
10 months ago
Option C sounds like the most efficient way to ensure projects are properly reviewed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elina
10 months ago
Hmm, I think option A is the best choice here. A global setup ensures that all projects are properly reviewed, no exceptions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
11 months ago
I'd have to go with option B. Creating a single-use approval process on each project gives us more flexibility to handle specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
10 months ago
Definitely, option B provides a more tailored approach to project approvals and ensures that each project is properly reviewed before closure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
10 months ago
I agree, having a single-use approval process on each project seems like the most efficient way to ensure proper review by the Project Sponsor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
10 months ago
Option B sounds like the best choice. It allows for more flexibility in handling different project requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
11 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Setting up a default approval process in the project template ensures consistency across all Marketing projects.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
10 months ago
Plus, it helps maintain accountability and transparency throughout the project lifecycle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
10 months ago
It definitely streamlines the approval process and ensures that nothing slips through the cracks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
10 months ago
I agree, having a standard process in the project template will make it easier for the Project Sponsor to review and approve projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
10 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Setting up a default approval process in the project template ensures consistency across all Marketing projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haydee
11 months ago
I think option A is the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel