New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E716 Exam - Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E716 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E716 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer is developing a custom module. As part of their implementation they have decided that all instances of their Custom\Module\Model\Example class should receive a new instance of Magento\Filesystem\Adapter\Local.

How would the developer achieve this using di. xml?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Two features that come out of the box with Adobe Commerce Cloud are Support ACL and Fastly. Support ACL is a feature that allows the developer to manage access control lists for different users and roles on the Adobe Commerce Cloud platform. The developer can create and assign permissions for different actions and resources on the project and environment levels. Fastly is a cloud-based caching service that improves site performance and security for Adobe Commerce Cloud projects.Fastly provides features such as CDN, image optimization, WAF, DDoS protection, etc. Verified Reference: [Magento 2.4 DevDocs]3


by Barbra at Jul 09, 2024, 04:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E716 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Miesha
3 months ago
Is there a reason they chose to inject the Local adapter like this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
3 months ago
Definitely Option C, it’s the most straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
3 months ago
Wait, why would you use Local adapter for all instances?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
4 months ago
I think Option A makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
4 months ago
Option B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
4 months ago
I might be mixing things up, but I think we need to use `` to pass the new instance. Is that right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
4 months ago
I feel like Option B looks familiar, but I can't recall if it was the right way to define the preference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
4 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to inject a different class, and I chose the right option based on the constructor parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
5 months ago
I remember something about using the `` tag in di.xml, but I'm not sure how to specify the instance correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different options here. I need to make sure I understand how to properly configure DI to inject dependencies like this. Let me think through each option carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident I know the right way to handle this using DI configuration. I'll review the options and select the one that correctly injects the dependency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand how to properly configure DI to inject dependencies. Let me re-read the question and options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward DI configuration question. I'll carefully review the options and think through the correct way to inject the Magento\Filesystem\Adapter\Local dependency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the question, the developer needs to use di.xml to ensure that all instances of Custom\Module\Model\Example receive a new instance of Magento\Filesystem\Adapter\Local. I'll carefully consider the options to determine the correct approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options here. IS-IS and EIGRP aren't as widely used as the others, so I'm not sure if they're supported on this particular platform. I'll have to read the question more closely and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
The question is asking which two statements are true, so I'll need to carefully consider each option and eliminate the ones that are false. Tracing listener-related errors is an interesting detail I'll keep in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
10 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I bet the right answer is actually a secret combination of all three options. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Tenesha
8 months ago
User 3: Maybe it's a combination of all three options, like a secret code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
8 months ago
User 2: No, I believe it's Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
8 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanda
10 months ago
Option C seems a bit too convoluted. I'd go with Option B - it's the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
8 months ago
Yeah, Option C does seem a bit complicated. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
9 months ago
I think Option A could work too, but Option B is simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
9 months ago
I agree, Option B is definitely the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remedios
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to review the Magento DI documentation again to make sure I understand the proper syntax.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
9 months ago
User 3: I believe they need to use the tag to pass the new instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
9 months ago
User 2: Yes, they can specify the dependency in the di.xml file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
9 months ago
User 1: I think the developer can achieve this by using di.xml file.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melinda
11 months ago
I believe Option A is the correct way to achieve this based on the image provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
11 months ago
I agree, di.xml is the way to go for injecting dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
11 months ago
Option B looks like the correct way to inject the Magento\\Filesystem\\Adapter\\Local instance into the Custom\\Module\\Model\\Example class.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
10 months ago
Let's go with Option B then, it seems like the most suitable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
10 months ago
I agree, Option B looks like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
10 months ago
Yes, Option B seems to be the correct choice for injecting the instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
10 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azzie
11 months ago
I think the developer should use di.xml to achieve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
11 months ago
I believe Option A is the correct way to achieve this based on the image provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
11 months ago
I agree, di.xml is the way to go for injecting dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
11 months ago
I think the developer should use di.xml to achieve this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel