Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E605 Exam - Topic 5 Question 7 Discussion

A customer has an ongoing scheduled batch dataflow (S3 source connector) that runs in every 8 hours starting 2 PM UTC. The customer requested for a schedule update to change the start time to 3 PM UTC and to run in every 6 hours. Which is the best possible solution to achieve that?
D) Use Flow Service API to patch update the scheduler (start time & frequency) of the existing dataflow
A) Disable the existing dataflow and create a new dataflow with requested schedule (backfill enabled)
B) From dataflow UI update the scheduler (start time & frequency) of the existing dataflow
C) Disable the existing dataflow and create a new dataflow with requested schedule (backfill disabled)

Adobe AD0-E605 Exam - Topic 5 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E605 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 5
[All AD0-E605 Questions]

A customer has an ongoing scheduled batch dataflow (S3 source connector) that runs in every 8 hours starting 2 PM UTC. The customer requested for a schedule update to change the start time to 3 PM UTC and to run in every 6 hours. Which is the best possible solution to achieve that?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In Adobe Experience Platform, the Dataflow User Interface (UI) currently has limitations regarding the modification of an active dataflow's schedule once it has been established. To update the 'start time' and 'frequency' of an existing batch dataflow without deleting it and losing historical context, the Flow Service API must be used.

By performing a PATCH request to the /flows endpoint, a developer can update the schedule object within the dataflow's JSON definition. This approach is superior to Options A and C because it maintains the existing dataflow ID and configuration, avoiding the 'double ingestion' or 'gaps' that can occur when creating new dataflows. Option B is incorrect as the current UI allows for very limited schedule edits (often only frequency, but not the base start time for certain connectors). Using the Flow Service API is the most efficient and 'clean' solution, ensuring that the S3 source connector continues to function with the updated requirements of 6-hour intervals starting at 3 PM UTC while preserving all lineage and monitoring history.

======

Would you like me to move on to the next set of questions from your list?


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Pok
1 month ago
Option A could work, but it feels unnecessary to create a new one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 month ago
I prefer option D. Using the API seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 months ago
I think option B is the easiest. Just update the existing dataflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 months ago
A new dataflow seems unnecessary, just update the existing one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
2 months ago
I agree with B, but what about backfilling?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
Wait, can you really patch the scheduler with the API?
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
4 months ago
I think D is better for a more seamless update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
4 months ago
Option B seems like the easiest way to update the schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m not confident about the implications of backfill being disabled. That part is a bit unclear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
5 months ago
I recall a similar question where we had to decide between creating a new dataflow or updating an existing one. I feel like option A might be overkill here.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using APIs for updates. Maybe option D could be the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar since we practiced updating schedules directly in the dataflow UI.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel