Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E559 Exam - Topic 3 Question 50 Discussion

A marketer conducted an A/B test and expected the new version to perform better than the original version. However, this did not occur.What conclusion can the marketer make about these A/B test results?
A) Their test hypothesis was invalidated and they should test again.
B) The test was erroneous and the results should be thrown out.
C) The test period was too short and they need to let it run for a longer time.

Adobe AD0-E559 Exam - Topic 3 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E559 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E559 Questions]

A marketer conducted an A/B test and expected the new version to perform better than the original version. However, this did not occur.

What conclusion can the marketer make about these A/B test results?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The conclusion that the marketer can make about these A/B test results is that their test hypothesis was invalidated and they should test again. This means that their assumption about what would improve their email performance was not supported by the data and they should try a different variation or element to test.The test was not erroneous or too short, as long as it was set up correctly and ran for a sufficient time period to reach statistical significance


by Margret at Jul 08, 2025, 09:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E559 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Melynda
6 months ago
Not sure if throwing out results is the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
6 months ago
Totally agree, the hypothesis was off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
6 months ago
They should definitely test again!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
6 months ago
Wait, how long did they actually run the test?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
7 months ago
I think the test was just flawed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
7 months ago
I feel a bit confused, but I think if the hypothesis was wrong, we should definitely test again, which makes me lean towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
7 months ago
I think we talked about how sometimes tests need more time to gather enough data, so maybe option C is also a possibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like if the test was flawed, we might just need to discard the results, which sounds like option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
7 months ago
I remember we discussed how an invalidated hypothesis means we might need to rethink our approach, so I think option A could be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. Since the expected result didn't happen, the test hypothesis must have been invalid. Gotta go with option A and test again with a revised plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
8 months ago
Wait, could it be that the test period was too short? Maybe the new version would have performed better if they had let it run longer. I'm leaning towards option C, but I'm not totally sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
8 months ago
Okay, I see what they're getting at. If the new version didn't perform better, then the original test hypothesis was wrong. I'll mark option A as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
8 months ago
Hmm, I think the key here is that the expected result didn't occur. That means the test hypothesis was likely incorrect, so I'd go with option A and test again with a revised hypothesis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the test was erroneous or if the hypothesis was just invalidated. I'll need to think through the possible reasons carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
10 months ago
Haha, I bet the marketer is feeling a bit like a magician who can't make their rabbit disappear. A/B testing can be a real head-scratcher sometimes, am I right? But hey, at least they're trying to improve their marketing game!
upvoted 0 times
Shawnta
9 months ago
A) Their test hypothesis was invalidated and they should test again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
10 months ago
B is the way to go. The test was clearly erroneous, and throwing out the results is the best option. Might as well start from scratch and forget this whole thing ever happened. Shake it off, marketer!
upvoted 0 times
Celeste
9 months ago
A) Their test hypothesis was invalidated and they should test again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hoa
11 months ago
I agree, they should let it run longer before drawing conclusions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
11 months ago
Or maybe they didn't give it enough time to run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with C. The test period was too short. How can you expect to get reliable results in just a few days? They need to let it run for at least a month, maybe two. Patience is a virtue, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. The test hypothesis was invalidated, so they need to go back and test again to see what's really going on. Better luck next time, marketer!
upvoted 0 times
Andra
10 months ago
B) The test was erroneous and the results should be thrown out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
10 months ago
A) Their test hypothesis was invalidated and they should test again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
10 months ago
B) The test was erroneous and the results should be thrown out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
10 months ago
A) Their test hypothesis was invalidated and they should test again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruby
11 months ago
Yeah, their hypothesis was probably wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
11 months ago
I think the marketer should test again.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel