Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E307 Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

A campaign workflow has 1,000 records coming into a Delivery. The messages to send count is 880.What are two possible s for the missing records? (Choose two.)
B) The missing records are part of an A/B test group.
A) The missing records were doubles.
C) The missing records have been rejected as spam.
D) The missing records are part of a control group.

Adobe AD0-E307 Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E307 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E307 Questions]

A campaign workflow has 1,000 records coming into a Delivery. The messages to send count is 880.

What are two possible s for the missing records? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Roxane
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the doubles? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
8 months ago
Control group makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
8 months ago
I doubt spam rejection is the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
9 months ago
Definitely think it's the A/B test group!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
9 months ago
The missing records could be doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think A could be a possibility too if there were duplicates in the records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like D makes sense because control groups are often excluded from messaging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think C could be right since spam filters often catch records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
10 months ago
I remember something about A/B tests, so maybe B is a good choice for one of the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards the missing records being part of an A/B test group or a control group. Those seem like the most logical options based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Could the missing records have been rejected as spam? Or maybe they were just duplicates that got filtered out?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure the missing records are either part of an A/B test group or a control group. Those seem like the most likely explanations to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. The total records coming in is 1,000, but the messages to send count is only 880. So there must be some missing records somewhere.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the possibilities carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 year ago
I'd go with option D. The missing records are probably part of a control group to measure the effectiveness of the campaign. Gotta keep those data scientists happy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Raymon
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option B. The missing records might be part of an A/B test group to compare different message variations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 year ago
I think option A could also be a possibility. Maybe the missing records were doubles in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 year ago
I agree, option D makes sense. It's important to have a control group for accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlene
1 year ago
Ha, I bet the missing records were just doubles! The campaign manager must have forgotten to de-dupe the list. Classic rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C seems plausible too. Those missing records could have been rejected as spam by the email service provider. Better double-check the deliverability settings.
upvoted 0 times
Eloisa
1 year ago
C) The missing records have been rejected as spam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
1 year ago
A) The missing records were doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theodora
1 year ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The missing records are likely part of an A/B test group, where a subset of the records are being compared to the main campaign for optimization purposes.
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Maybe the missing records were just duplicates in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
1 year ago
That's a good point, option D could be a possibility as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 year ago
I think option D could also be a possibility. The missing records might be part of a control group for comparison.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
1 year ago
I think it could also be option D. The missing records might be part of a control group for comparison.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
1 year ago
I agree, option B makes sense. It's common to have a test group for optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
1 year ago
I agree, option B makes sense. It's common to have a test group in campaigns.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rex
1 year ago
I agree with both of you. It's possible that the missing records are part of an A/B test group or were doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I believe the missing records might have been doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 year ago
I think the missing records could be part of an A/B test group.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel