Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E307 Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Posted by Frank on Jan 10, 2025 at 04:40 AM

A campaign workflow has 1,000 records coming into a Delivery. The messages to send count is 880.

What are two possible s for the missing records? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium AD0-E307 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
RO
Roxane 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the doubles? Seems odd.
AI
Aileen 11 months ago
Control group makes sense too.
FR
Frankie 11 months ago
I doubt spam rejection is the issue here.
FA
Fatima 12 months ago
Definitely think it's the A/B test group!
LA
Lashon 12 months ago
The missing records could be doubles.
GA
Gabriele 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think A could be a possibility too if there were duplicates in the records.
JO
Josefa 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like D makes sense because control groups are often excluded from messaging.
MI
Michael 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think C could be right since spam filters often catch records.
SA
Sarina 1 year ago
I remember something about A/B tests, so maybe B is a good choice for one of the answers.
SH
Shalon 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards the missing records being part of an A/B test group or a control group. Those seem like the most logical options based on the information provided.
BO
Bobbye 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Could the missing records have been rejected as spam? Or maybe they were just duplicates that got filtered out?
OR
Oren 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the missing records are either part of an A/B test group or a control group. Those seem like the most likely explanations to me.
LO
Loreta 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The total records coming in is 1,000, but the messages to send count is only 880. So there must be some missing records somewhere.
RE
Reid 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the possibilities carefully.
JE
Jesus 1 year ago
I'd go with option D. The missing records are probably part of a control group to measure the effectiveness of the campaign. Gotta keep those data scientists happy, you know?
RA
Raymon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesus
I'm leaning towards option B. The missing records might be part of an A/B test group to compare different message variations.
AL
Aliza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesus
I think option A could also be a possibility. Maybe the missing records were doubles in the system.
CA
Caprice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesus
I agree, option D makes sense. It's important to have a control group for accurate results.
PE
Pearlene 1 year ago
Ha, I bet the missing records were just doubles! The campaign manager must have forgotten to de-dupe the list. Classic rookie mistake.
EL
Eleonora 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C seems plausible too. Those missing records could have been rejected as spam by the email service provider. Better double-check the deliverability settings.
EL
Eloisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonora
C) The missing records have been rejected as spam.
AL
Alonzo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonora
A) The missing records were doubles.
TH
Theodora 2 years ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The missing records are likely part of an A/B test group, where a subset of the records are being compared to the main campaign for optimization purposes.
CA
Catarina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theodora
I'm leaning towards option A. Maybe the missing records were just duplicates in the system.
DI
Diane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theodora
That's a good point, option D could be a possibility as well.
LU
Luis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theodora
I think option D could also be a possibility. The missing records might be part of a control group for comparison.
WI
Willie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theodora
I think it could also be option D. The missing records might be part of a control group for comparison.
EL
Elina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theodora
I agree, option B makes sense. It's common to have a test group for optimization.
RA
Raylene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Theodora
I agree, option B makes sense. It's common to have a test group in campaigns.
RE
Rex 2 years ago
I agree with both of you. It's possible that the missing records are part of an A/B test group or were doubles.
CO
Corinne 2 years ago
I believe the missing records might have been doubles.
VA
Vanna 2 years ago
I think the missing records could be part of an A/B test group.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel