Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E307 Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E307 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E307 Questions]

A campaign workflow has 1,000 records coming into a Delivery. The messages to send count is 880.

What are two possible s for the missing records? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Roxane
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the doubles? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
4 months ago
Control group makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
4 months ago
I doubt spam rejection is the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
5 months ago
Definitely think it's the A/B test group!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
5 months ago
The missing records could be doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think A could be a possibility too if there were duplicates in the records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like D makes sense because control groups are often excluded from messaging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think C could be right since spam filters often catch records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
5 months ago
I remember something about A/B tests, so maybe B is a good choice for one of the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards the missing records being part of an A/B test group or a control group. Those seem like the most logical options based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Could the missing records have been rejected as spam? Or maybe they were just duplicates that got filtered out?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the missing records are either part of an A/B test group or a control group. Those seem like the most likely explanations to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The total records coming in is 1,000, but the messages to send count is only 880. So there must be some missing records somewhere.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the possibilities carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
10 months ago
I'd go with option D. The missing records are probably part of a control group to measure the effectiveness of the campaign. Gotta keep those data scientists happy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Raymon
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. The missing records might be part of an A/B test group to compare different message variations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
10 months ago
I think option A could also be a possibility. Maybe the missing records were doubles in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
10 months ago
I agree, option D makes sense. It's important to have a control group for accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlene
11 months ago
Ha, I bet the missing records were just doubles! The campaign manager must have forgotten to de-dupe the list. Classic rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C seems plausible too. Those missing records could have been rejected as spam by the email service provider. Better double-check the deliverability settings.
upvoted 0 times
Eloisa
10 months ago
C) The missing records have been rejected as spam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
10 months ago
A) The missing records were doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theodora
11 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The missing records are likely part of an A/B test group, where a subset of the records are being compared to the main campaign for optimization purposes.
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Maybe the missing records were just duplicates in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
10 months ago
That's a good point, option D could be a possibility as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
10 months ago
I think option D could also be a possibility. The missing records might be part of a control group for comparison.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
11 months ago
I think it could also be option D. The missing records might be part of a control group for comparison.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
11 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. It's common to have a test group for optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
11 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. It's common to have a test group in campaigns.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rex
12 months ago
I agree with both of you. It's possible that the missing records are part of an A/B test group or were doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
12 months ago
I believe the missing records might have been doubles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
12 months ago
I think the missing records could be part of an A/B test group.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel