I think the key here is that the chain of custody is about establishing the evidence hasn't been changed or messed with. So A seems like the best answer to me.
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. The whole point of the chain of custody is to demonstrate the integrity of the evidence, right? That's the main purpose, to make sure it hasn't been tampered with.
Okay, for this type of question, I'd focus on the wording of the options. Maintaining the chain of custody is all about being able to show the evidence hasn't been altered, so I'd go with option A.
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it about making sure only authorized people handle the evidence? Or is it more about being able to prove the chain of custody in court?
Gerri
12 days agoMartin
17 days agoTeri
22 days agoVeronika
27 days agoMica
1 month agoFranklyn
1 month agoCorazon
1 month agoThora
2 months agoSkye
2 months agoNan
2 months agoFrancis
2 months agoBette
2 months agoArlyne
2 months agoAvery
3 months agoLenna
3 months agoMargarita
3 months agoHaley
3 months agoJeffrey
4 months agoLucy
4 months agoCornell
4 months agoVincenza
4 months agoRosita
4 months agoWeldon
3 months ago