Haha, the government doesn't have to prove the defendant knew the identity of every single participant. That's just ridiculous! Option A is the way to go.
No way, the defendant doesn't need to know all the details or objectives. That's just too high of a bar for the government to meet. I'm going with Option A.
I agree with you, option B seems more logical. It states that the conspirators accomplished the purpose of the conspiracy that was initially established.
Adelle
28 days agoMona
29 days agoEttie
1 months agoWerner
15 days agoViola
19 days agoLonna
20 days agoJerilyn
2 months agoAfton
15 days agoCasie
24 days agoArleen
1 months agoMariann
2 months agoHershel
3 months agoMariann
3 months ago