Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

The government filed a avil action against a politician for accepting real estate as a bribe. There is a possibility that the politician could transfer the real estate to a third party before the court enters a final judgment Which type of order should the government seek from the court to prevent the politician from transferring the real estate?
D) Litigation hold
A) Preservation order
B) Declaratory relief
C) Prejudgment attachment

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Law exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All CFE-Law Questions]

The government filed a avil action against a politician for accepting real estate as a bribe. There is a possibility that the politician could transfer the real estate to a third party before the court enters a final judgment Which type of order should the government seek from the court to prevent the politician from transferring the real estate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Pa
7 months ago
Are we sure that's the right move? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
7 months ago
I agree, preservation order is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
7 months ago
Surprised they haven't done this sooner!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
8 months ago
I think prejudgment attachment makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
8 months ago
Definitely a preservation order!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards declaratory relief, but I’m not confident. It feels like it might not directly prevent the transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
8 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I feel like a litigation hold was mentioned, but I don't think that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about preservation orders being used in similar cases. Could that be the answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
8 months ago
I think the government should go for a prejudgment attachment to prevent the transfer. It seems like the right move to secure the asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
8 months ago
I think the best approach here is to use CloudPages to collect and subscribe the users. That way we can directly capture their email addresses and add them to the Marketing Cloud database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
8 months ago
Blue Ocean REICC is an interesting strategy, but I'm not sure if it's considered an important part of the ideation process itself. I'll have to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the profile strategy and the potential risks involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
1 year ago
Seriously, why does this politician even need a bribe? Aren't they already rolling in the dough from all those 'campaign contributions'? Guess they just can't get enough of that sweet, sweet real estate!
upvoted 0 times
Glendora
11 months ago
D) Litigation hold
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
11 months ago
I agree, they should be held accountable for their actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
12 months ago
B) Declaratory relief
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
12 months ago
I know right, it's ridiculous how greedy some politicians can be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
12 months ago
C) Prejudgment attachment
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
12 months ago
A) Preservation order
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmela
1 year ago
Hold up, folks. I'm voting for A) Preservation order. That way, the court can ensure the real estate is preserved, without all the drama of seizing it. Keeps things nice and tidy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Shayne
1 year ago
Definitely, it's a proactive step to protect the integrity of the case and prevent any potential tampering with evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a smart move to make sure the property is preserved until the court makes a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 year ago
I agree, A) Preservation order seems like the best option to prevent the transfer of the real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
Ah, the government's got to act fast! C) Prejudgment attachment is the way to go. That politician's probably got a briefcase full of cash ready to make that real estate disappear!
upvoted 0 times
Rosenda
1 year ago
C) Prejudgment attachment
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
1 year ago
B) Declaratory relief
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
1 year ago
A) Preservation order
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Maybe B) Declaratory relief would be better, just to get a court declaration that the real estate is illegally obtained. Seems less messy than attachment.
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
12 months ago
D) Litigation hold might be another way to prevent the politician from transferring the real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
12 months ago
I think A) Preservation order is the best choice to stop the transfer of the real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
1 year ago
C) Prejudgment attachment could also be a good option to secure the real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
1 year ago
A) Preservation order would be more effective in preventing the transfer of the real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
1 year ago
I agree, it would help preserve the real estate until the court makes a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
1 year ago
I think A) Preservation order would be the best option to prevent the transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
C) Prejudgment attachment
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
1 year ago
A) Preservation order
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beth
1 year ago
I think a prejudgment attachment could also be a good option to prevent the politician from transferring the real estate before the court enters a final judgment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
I think C) Prejudgment attachment is the correct answer. This type of order would allow the government to seize the real estate before the final judgment, preventing the politician from transferring it.
upvoted 0 times
Julian
1 year ago
Yes, that makes sense. It would ensure that the politician doesn't try to get rid of the bribe before the court makes a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
1 year ago
I agree, C) Prejudgment attachment would be the best option to prevent the transfer of the real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrie
1 year ago
I agree with Ronnie, a preservation order would be the best option to protect the real estate from being transferred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 year ago
The government should seek a preservation order to prevent the politician from transferring the real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel