MENU
If an important witness becomes hostile and argumentative during an interview, the interviewer should generally.
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
JU
Jutta
12 months ago
Reasoning with them could work, but it's risky.
ST
Stevie
12 months ago
Wait, terminating the interview? That seems extreme!
ZO
Zona
12 months ago
But what if they just keep lying?
JA
Janna
1 year ago
Totally agree, arguing won't help!
JE
Jennifer
1 year ago
I think avoiding reaction is key.
HO
Hollis
1 year ago
Refuting the witness's arguments seems risky; it might escalate the situation. I think I read something about staying calm instead.
LA
Laquanda
1 year ago
I feel like terminating the interview could be too extreme unless things get really out of hand. I just can't recall the exact guidelines.
FR
France
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where reasoning with a hostile witness backfired. Maybe that's not the right approach here?
ME
Melina
1 year ago
I think avoiding reacting to the witness might be the best option, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like a good way to keep control of the interview.
OR
Oren
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to remember that a significant deficiency is a weakness that's important enough to merit attention, while a material weakness is a deficiency with a reasonable possibility of material misstatement. I think option C best describes the framework Gail should use.
ED
Edison
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Option B is the answer - an experienced tester making a list of potential defects and then designing tests to generate those failures. That's a pretty methodical approach to error guessing, compared to the other options.
TY
Ty
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question about Backup Exec. I think the metadata is likely stored in the Backup Exec database, so I'll go with option C.
PO
Polly
1 year ago
This one seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is A - FF02::1, since that's the well-known multicast address for the MLDv2 general query.
AD
Adelaide
1 year ago
Refuting the witness's arguments? That's like trying to win an argument with a toddler - they'll just keep moving the goalposts and you'll end up exhausted.
HU
Huey
1 year ago
D) Terminate the interview.
SE
Serita
1 year ago
C) Try to reason with the witness
SU
Suzi
1 year ago
A) Avoid reacting to the witness.
TA
Tabetha
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure trying to reason with a hostile witness is the wisest move. It's like trying to teach a cat to play the piano - it's just not going to end well.
ME
Mertie
1 year ago
D) Terminate the interview.
LO
Lorrine
1 year ago
A) Avoid reacting to the witness.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
I'd go with terminating the interview. No point in trying to reason with someone who's being unreasonable.
JA
Jaime
2 years ago
Avoiding reacting to the witness seems like the best approach. We don't want to escalate the situation further.
DA
Dalene
1 year ago
C) Try to reason with the witness.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
A) Avoid reacting to the witness.
MO
Moon
2 years ago
I think if the witness is being hostile, it might be best to terminate the interview to avoid any further conflict.
JE
Jettie
2 years ago
I agree with Cherrie, it's important to try to de-escalate the situation.
CH
Cherrie
2 years ago
I think we should try to reason with the witness.