Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AAPC Exam CPC Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for AAPC's CPC exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All CPC Questions]

Which one of the following is an example of a case in which a diabetes-related problem exists and the code for diabetes is never sequenced first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Josue at Jun 02, 2024, 06:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Elinore
3 months ago
I'm feeling confident about C. After all, if the patient is being treated for secondary diabetes, the underlying condition would take precedence in the coding, not the diabetes itself. Diabetes is just the symptom in that case, not the root problem.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
1 months ago
D) If the patient is being treated for type 2 diabetes
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
1 months ago
C) If the patient is being treated for secondary diabetes
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
1 months ago
B) If the patient has an underdose of insulin due to an insulin pump malfunction
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 months ago
A) If the patient has hyperglycemia that is not responding to medication
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
2 months ago
Yes, it's important to prioritize the underlying condition when coding for diabetes-related problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
2 months ago
I agree, the coding should reflect the main condition being treated, which is the secondary diabetes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
I think you're right, C makes sense because secondary diabetes is the primary focus in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sunny
3 months ago
Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! I bet the test-writers had a good laugh coming up with these options. But seriously, I'm going with C as well. Seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Arlene
2 months ago
Yeah, C seems like the best choice. It fits the criteria given in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards C as well. It just seems like the most likely scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
2 months ago
I think C is the correct answer too. It makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gertude
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Doesn't option B seem like a pretty straightforward case of a diabetes-related problem where the code for diabetes wouldn't be sequenced first? I mean, if your insulin pump malfunctions, that's gotta be the main issue, right?
upvoted 0 times
Marcelle
3 months ago
User 2: But what about option C, if the patient is being treated for secondary diabetes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
4 months ago
User 1: I think option B makes sense, the insulin pump malfunction would be the main issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Miss
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) If the patient has hyperglycemia that is not responding to medication could also be a valid answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
4 months ago
I agree with Avery, because secondary diabetes is a separate condition from type 2 diabetes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. If the patient is being treated for secondary diabetes, the code for the underlying condition causing the diabetes would be sequenced first, not the code for diabetes itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) If the patient is being treated for secondary diabetes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel