Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AACE International Exam AACE-PSP Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for AACE International's AACE-PSP exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All AACE-PSP Questions]

Which of the following options is NOT a feasible method to reduce the overall completion time of the toll road program?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Viola at Sep 17, 2024, 04:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lauran
20 days ago
I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above'. That would be a real head-scratcher!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
22 days ago
Wait, they're asking which option is NOT feasible? That's a bit of a tricky one. I hope I don't fall for the old 'trick question' ploy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
30 days ago
Option A is the way to go! Subcontracting outside help is the quickest solution. Plus, it'll free up my time for a much-needed coffee break.
upvoted 0 times
Salena
8 days ago
A) Subcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dallas
1 months ago
Option D sounds promising, but reducing the phasing might create other logistical challenges. I'll have to think that one through.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
8 days ago
Allocating forces from other contracts might help, but it could impact those projects negatively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
16 days ago
Subcontracting outside forces seems like a good option to speed up the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
27 days ago
I agree, reducing the phasing could lead to more complications down the road.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Option B. Pulling resources from other projects could cause issues there. It's a risky move.
upvoted 0 times
Mindy
21 days ago
I think we should focus on options that won't jeopardize other contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
29 days ago
I agree, Option B does seem risky. It could impact other projects negatively.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reyes
2 months ago
Option C is definitely not feasible. That would be a major violation of environmental regulations. I can't believe they even included that as an option.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
24 days ago
Allocating forces from other contracts might cause delays in those projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
27 days ago
I think reducing the phasing could also help speed up the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
29 days ago
Subcontracting outside forces seems like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 months ago
I agree, option C is definitely not a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
2 months ago
But wouldn't reducing the phasing compromise the quality of the project?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Reduce the phasing from 5 phases to 3 phases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel