MENU
Which of the following options is NOT a feasible method to reduce the overall completion time of the toll road program?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
CH
Christiane
11 months ago
Allocating forces from other contracts seems smart!
MA
Margot
11 months ago
Wait, reducing phases? That sounds too ambitious.
RO
Ronald
11 months ago
Subcontracting could actually help speed things up.
AN
Anisha
12 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
CA
Carey
12 months ago
I think option C is risky.
HE
Helaine
1 year ago
Reducing the phases sounds like it could save time, but I’m not confident if it would actually work in this scenario.
JU
Justine
1 year ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about environmental studies and how they can impact timelines. Proceeding without them seems risky.
ME
Melodie
1 year ago
I feel like allocating forces from other contracts could be a good option, but I wonder if it might stretch resources too thin.
RE
Reena
1 year ago
I think I remember that subcontracting can sometimes lead to faster completion, but I'm not sure if it's always feasible.
SO
Solange
1 year ago
I've got a good strategy for this one. I'll eliminate the options that are clearly feasible ways to speed up the project, and then the remaining one must be the answer. C seems like the obvious non-feasible option here.
JI
Jin
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty confident that C is the correct answer - going ahead with the work before the environmental studies are done would be a major risk and likely not allowed. The other options seem like reasonable ways to speed things up.
YO
Yolande
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. The options all seem like they could potentially reduce the completion time, so I'll need to analyze each one closely.
AN
Anissa
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is C - proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies, since that would likely be illegal and not a feasible option.
MI
Minna
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. All the options seem like they could work to reduce the completion time. I'll have to re-read it a few times and think it through step-by-step to figure out which one is definitely not feasible.
LY
Lynsey
1 year ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to disable split-horizon to allow inter-branch communication. Could that be the fix here?
LA
Lauran
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above'. That would be a real head-scratcher!
LI
Linette
1 year ago
Wait, they're asking which option is NOT feasible? That's a bit of a tricky one. I hope I don't fall for the old 'trick question' ploy.
CA
Carlton
1 year ago
C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies
JA
Janey
1 year ago
B) Allocating forces from other BILCO contracts to the toll road project
IZ
Izetta
1 year ago
A) Subcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule
EV
Eveline
1 year ago
Option A is the way to go! Subcontracting outside help is the quickest solution. Plus, it'll free up my time for a much-needed coffee break.
RO
Rodney
1 year ago
C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies
TH
Theodora
1 year ago
B) Allocating forces from other BILCO contracts to the toll road project
SA
Salena
1 year ago
A) Subcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule
DA
Dallas
1 year ago
Option D sounds promising, but reducing the phasing might create other logistical challenges. I'll have to think that one through.
ME
Meaghan
1 year ago
Allocating forces from other contracts might help, but it could impact those projects negatively.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
Subcontracting outside forces seems like a good option to speed up the project.
ME
Merilyn
1 year ago
I agree, reducing the phasing could lead to more complications down the road.
RO
Roxane
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Option B. Pulling resources from other projects could cause issues there. It's a risky move.
MI
Mindy
1 year ago
I think we should focus on options that won't jeopardize other contracts.
LE
Leoma
1 year ago
I agree, Option B does seem risky. It could impact other projects negatively.
RE
Reyes
2 years ago
Option C is definitely not feasible. That would be a major violation of environmental regulations. I can't believe they even included that as an option.
ER
Ernie
1 year ago
Allocating forces from other contracts might cause delays in those projects.
ST
Stephanie
1 year ago
I think reducing the phasing could also help speed up the project.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
Subcontracting outside forces seems like a better option.
CE
Celeste
1 year ago
I agree, option C is definitely not a good idea.
VI
Viola
2 years ago
But wouldn't reducing the phasing compromise the quality of the project?
NI
Nilsa
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Reduce the phasing from 5 phases to 3 phases.
VI
Viola
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies.