Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AACE International AACE-PSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Which of the following options is NOT a feasible method to reduce the overall completion time of the toll road program?
D) Reduce the phasing from 5 phases to 3 phases
A) Subcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule
B) Allocating forces from other BILCO contracts to the toll road project
C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies

AACE International AACE-PSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for AACE International's AACE-PSP exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All AACE-PSP Questions]

Which of the following options is NOT a feasible method to reduce the overall completion time of the toll road program?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Viola at Sep 17, 2024, 04:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Christiane
9 months ago
Allocating forces from other contracts seems smart!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
9 months ago
Wait, reducing phases? That sounds too ambitious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
9 months ago
Subcontracting could actually help speed things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
10 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
10 months ago
I think option C is risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
10 months ago
Reducing the phases sounds like it could save time, but I’m not confident if it would actually work in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
10 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about environmental studies and how they can impact timelines. Proceeding without them seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
10 months ago
I feel like allocating forces from other contracts could be a good option, but I wonder if it might stretch resources too thin.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
11 months ago
I think I remember that subcontracting can sometimes lead to faster completion, but I'm not sure if it's always feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
11 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this one. I'll eliminate the options that are clearly feasible ways to speed up the project, and then the remaining one must be the answer. C seems like the obvious non-feasible option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty confident that C is the correct answer - going ahead with the work before the environmental studies are done would be a major risk and likely not allowed. The other options seem like reasonable ways to speed things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. The options all seem like they could potentially reduce the completion time, so I'll need to analyze each one closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
11 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is C - proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies, since that would likely be illegal and not a feasible option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. All the options seem like they could work to reduce the completion time. I'll have to re-read it a few times and think it through step-by-step to figure out which one is definitely not feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
11 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to disable split-horizon to allow inter-branch communication. Could that be the fix here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above'. That would be a real head-scratcher!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
1 year ago
Wait, they're asking which option is NOT feasible? That's a bit of a tricky one. I hope I don't fall for the old 'trick question' ploy.
upvoted 0 times
Carlton
1 year ago
C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 year ago
B) Allocating forces from other BILCO contracts to the toll road project
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
A) Subcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
1 year ago
Option A is the way to go! Subcontracting outside help is the quickest solution. Plus, it'll free up my time for a much-needed coffee break.
upvoted 0 times
Rodney
1 year ago
C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 year ago
B) Allocating forces from other BILCO contracts to the toll road project
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
A) Subcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dallas
1 year ago
Option D sounds promising, but reducing the phasing might create other logistical challenges. I'll have to think that one through.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
1 year ago
Allocating forces from other contracts might help, but it could impact those projects negatively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 year ago
Subcontracting outside forces seems like a good option to speed up the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 year ago
I agree, reducing the phasing could lead to more complications down the road.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Option B. Pulling resources from other projects could cause issues there. It's a risky move.
upvoted 0 times
Mindy
1 year ago
I think we should focus on options that won't jeopardize other contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
1 year ago
I agree, Option B does seem risky. It could impact other projects negatively.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reyes
1 year ago
Option C is definitely not feasible. That would be a major violation of environmental regulations. I can't believe they even included that as an option.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
1 year ago
Allocating forces from other contracts might cause delays in those projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 year ago
I think reducing the phasing could also help speed up the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
Subcontracting outside forces seems like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 year ago
I agree, option C is definitely not a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
1 year ago
But wouldn't reducing the phasing compromise the quality of the project?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Reduce the phasing from 5 phases to 3 phases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel