That's a valid point, but I still think option A is more flexible in terms of namespace validation. It ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the XML Schema document.
I think option B is the correct answer. It allows for any other elements from other namespaces, while still requiring the 'tns:person' element to be present.
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct choice as it specifies a different namespace for the 'any' element and also allows for unbounded occurrences of 'person'.
Jules
5 days agoEmerson
5 days agoLeslie
11 days agoJules
13 days ago