Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

XML Exam I10-003 Topic 8 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for XML's I10-003 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 8
[All I10-003 Questions]

Assume that you wish to create an XML Schema document against which [XML Document] (referenced in a separate window) is valid.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, F

by Joni at Mar 07, 2024, 09:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium I10-003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mirta
3 months ago
Option B - the 'any' element with 'lax' processing is a classic move. Gotta love that flexible schema design!
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
1 months ago
User4: Definitely, it's important to have that flexibility in the schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
2 months ago
User3: I agree, it's a classic move for creating a valid XML Schema document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, it allows for more flexibility in the schema design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
2 months ago
User1: I think option B with 'any' element and 'lax' processing is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alishia
3 months ago
This question is making my head spin! I'm going to go with option B and hope for the best. XML schemas can be tricky.
upvoted 0 times
Mica
2 months ago
User3: I'm not sure about XML schemas, but option B sounds like a good option based on your reasoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
3 months ago
User2: I agree, XML schemas can be tricky to work with. Option B seems like a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
3 months ago
User1: I think option B is a good choice. XML schemas can be confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
3 months ago
Hmm, option C has a typo in the namespace declaration. I'd avoid that one. B or D seem like the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. The 'choice' element gives more flexibility in handling the 'division' and 'title' elements.
upvoted 0 times
Lynsey
3 months ago
True, option A could be a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
3 months ago
I think option A might be simpler to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
3 months ago
I agree, the 'choice' element allows for different possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
3 months ago
Option D seems like a good choice for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilbert
4 months ago
Option A looks good too, but I'm not sure if allowing any namespace is a good idea. B seems more controlled and specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
4 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option A is more flexible in terms of namespace validation. It ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the XML Schema document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
4 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. It allows for any other elements from other namespaces, while still requiring the 'tns:person' element to be present.
upvoted 0 times
Micah
3 months ago
I think option B is the best because it allows for elements from other namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most flexible choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct choice as it specifies a different namespace for the 'any' element and also allows for unbounded occurrences of 'person'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
4 months ago
I think option A is correct because it allows any namespace and has an unbounded occurrence of the 'person' element.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel