Push the Exhibit Button to load the referenced "testml.xsd".

Assume that "testml.xsd" is defined. Without rewriting this XML Schema Document ("testml.xsd"), create a new, separate XML Schema Document to partially change the schema definition to write a cell Phone element as a child element of the person element. As a result, the following "XML Document" will be valid against the new schema. Which of the following correctly describes the new XML Schema Document? Assume the XML parser correctly processes the XML schema Location attribute.
[XML.Documet]
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium I10-002 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
PA
Patrick
12 months ago
D doesn't sound right; it should be possible!
WI
Wilford
12 months ago
Wait, can you really redefine like that?
LA
Laquita
12 months ago
C seems a bit complicated for this.
DE
Delisa
1 year ago
I think B is the way to go.
LI
Linn
1 year ago
Option A looks good to me!
ZA
Zachary
1 year ago
I can't recall if we covered the substitution group concept in detail, but option B seems interesting if it allows for new types under the same group.
MA
Maynard
1 year ago
I feel like option A is too simple; it doesn't really redefine the person type, which is what we need to do for the cellPhone element.
CA
Carylon
1 year ago
I think option C might be right because redefining the type seems to allow for adding new elements, but I'm not completely confident.
DA
Dacia
1 year ago
I remember we practiced a similar question about extending XML schemas, but I'm not sure if I should use import or include here.
LA
Lashaunda
1 year ago
This looks like a requirements.txt file, which is a common way to specify Python package dependencies. I'll review the file structure and contents to determine the correct answer.
MA
Margart
1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to carefully review the code and the partial report to figure out why the labels aren't displaying.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
I think A is correct about diversifying with different industries, but I'm not entirely sure about B. It seems too absolute to say systematic risk can be fully eliminated.