Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

XML I10-002 Exam - Topic 3 Question 36 Discussion

Posted by My on May 05, 2022 at 10:07 PM

Push the Exhibit Button to load the referenced "testml.xsd".

Assume that "testml.xsd" is defined. Without rewriting this XML Schema Document ("testml.xsd"), create a new, separate XML Schema Document to partially change the schema definition to write a cell Phone element as a child element of the person element. As a result, the following "XML Document" will be valid against the new schema. Which of the following correctly describes the new XML Schema Document? Assume the XML parser correctly processes the XML schema Location attribute.

[XML.Documet]

John Smith

03-000-999

00-1111-2222

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium I10-002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
PA
Patrick 12 months ago
D doesn't sound right; it should be possible!
WI
Wilford 12 months ago
Wait, can you really redefine like that?
LA
Laquita 12 months ago
C seems a bit complicated for this.
DE
Delisa 1 year ago
I think B is the way to go.
LI
Linn 1 year ago
Option A looks good to me!
ZA
Zachary 1 year ago
I can't recall if we covered the substitution group concept in detail, but option B seems interesting if it allows for new types under the same group.
MA
Maynard 1 year ago
I feel like option A is too simple; it doesn't really redefine the person type, which is what we need to do for the cellPhone element.
CA
Carylon 1 year ago
I think option C might be right because redefining the type seems to allow for adding new elements, but I'm not completely confident.
DA
Dacia 1 year ago
I remember we practiced a similar question about extending XML schemas, but I'm not sure if I should use import or include here.
LA
Lashaunda 1 year ago
This looks like a requirements.txt file, which is a common way to specify Python package dependencies. I'll review the file structure and contents to determine the correct answer.
MA
Margart 1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to carefully review the code and the partial report to figure out why the labels aren't displaying.
AS
Ashton 1 year ago
I think A is correct about diversifying with different industries, but I'm not entirely sure about B. It seems too absolute to say systematic risk can be fully eliminated.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel