Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

XML I10-001 Exam - Topic 7 Question 46 Discussion

Posted by Helene on Oct 16, 2022 at 03:51 PM

Select which statement correctly describes the XML document below.

[XML Documents]

]>

Suggested Answer: A, C

Get Premium I10-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
DA
Darell 12 months ago
I thought it was valid at first, but now I'm not so sure!
MI
Millie 12 months ago
The attribute value isn't in the list, so it's definitely not valid.
MA
Marguerita 12 months ago
Wait, is it really invalid? I thought it could have implied attributes.
MA
Mattie 1 year ago
Totally agree, that's not valid XML!
EF
Effie 1 year ago
This document has an EMPTY element but still has an attribute.
MA
Malcom 1 year ago
I feel like D is definitely wrong because it says it's valid, but I remember EMPTY elements can't have attributes at all.
MA
Marisha 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where the attribute had to match the defined values, but I can't recall if line feeds affect validity.
SA
Santos 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think an attribute value can only be one of the specified options, so maybe C is right?
CH
Cherilyn 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how an EMPTY element can't have attributes, so I think option B might be correct.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
Okay, let me see. The question is asking for the SQL statement that would return the Customers2 relation from the Customers relation. I think I need to focus on the Satisfaction_Rate column and the conditions given.
UN
Una 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'd need to think through the details of how Docker config objects work and whether that's the best approach for this scenario.
YU
Yuette 1 year ago
I'm feeling a little lost on this one. There are a lot of options and I'm not sure which two are the correct ones. I'll have to go through each choice carefully and try to eliminate the ones that don't seem relevant.
TA
Tawny 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know there's a way to display additional metrics, but I can't remember if it's called Drill Down or something else. I'll have to think this through carefully.
DO
Dottie 1 year ago
I remember studying that high-net-worth usually indicates individuals with at least $1 million in liquid assets, but it might vary by context.
AL
Alfreda 1 year ago
Wait, so you're telling me an XML document can't have a little line break? What is this, the Stone Age? My toaster has more flexibility than that!
DE
Deangelo 1 year ago
D, really? This doc is as valid as a politician's promise. The attribute value doesn't match the declared options. Nice try, though!
JO
Jose 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deangelo
C) This is not a valid XML document, because the attribute value is not a value listed in the attribute list declaration.
CH
Chana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deangelo
B) This is not a valid XML document, because an attribute cannot be designated for an element that is designated as EMPTY.
GE
Georgeanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deangelo
A) This is not a well-formed document, because the attribute value cannot have a line feed in it.
MA
Mable 1 year ago
Hah, the EMPTY element with an attribute? That's a classic XML blunder. No wonder it's not valid!
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mable
User 3: Classic XML blunder for sure!
FR
Francesco 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mable
Lindsey: It's important to follow the rules to ensure the document is valid.
LI
Lindsey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mable
User 2: I agree, it's a common mistake in XML documents.
TA
Tamera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mable
User 2: I agree, an attribute cannot be designated for an element that is designated as EMPTY.
RA
Ranee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mable
User 1: Yeah, that's definitely not valid. Attributes can't be designated for EMPTY elements.
MA
Marta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mable
User 1: Yeah, that's definitely not a valid XML document.
SE
Sean 2 years ago
I agree, the line feed in the attribute value is a problem. This is definitely not a valid XML document.
AR
Aron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
Exactly, the attribute value must match one of the listed values for it to be valid.
KE
Kelvin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
So, that makes this XML document invalid.
NA
Nana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
Yes, you're right. The attribute value 'ABC' is not listed in the declaration.
BE
Bettina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
I think the attribute value must be one of the listed values in the attribute list declaration.
AL
Alysa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
Exactly, an attribute cannot have a line feed in it.
LA
Lashawnda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
So, it's not a valid XML document, right?
ME
Merrilee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
Yes, that's correct. It makes the document not well-formed.
KR
Kris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sean
I think the attribute value cannot have a line feed in it.
VI
Vivan 2 years ago
This is not a well-formed document, because the attribute value cannot have a line feed in it. The attribute value should be a single, continuous string.
NI
Nieves 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vivan
B
WA
Wade 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vivan
A
AS
Ashlyn 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the attribute value being listed in the attribute list declaration is also a valid point. So, maybe C could also be correct.
HO
Honey 2 years ago
I agree with you, Fabiola. The attribute cannot be designated for an element that is designated as EMPTY.
FA
Fabiola 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel