New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

XML I10-001 Exam - Topic 7 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for XML's I10-001 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 7
[All I10-001 Questions]

Select which statement correctly describes the XML document below.

[XML Documents]

]>

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Darell
4 months ago
I thought it was valid at first, but now I'm not so sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
4 months ago
The attribute value isn't in the list, so it's definitely not valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
4 months ago
Wait, is it really invalid? I thought it could have implied attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
Totally agree, that's not valid XML!
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
5 months ago
This document has an EMPTY element but still has an attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
5 months ago
I feel like D is definitely wrong because it says it's valid, but I remember EMPTY elements can't have attributes at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the attribute had to match the defined values, but I can't recall if line feeds affect validity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think an attribute value can only be one of the specified options, so maybe C is right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how an EMPTY element can't have attributes, so I think option B might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. The question is asking for the SQL statement that would return the Customers2 relation from the Customers relation. I think I need to focus on the Satisfaction_Rate column and the conditions given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'd need to think through the details of how Docker config objects work and whether that's the best approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
I'm feeling a little lost on this one. There are a lot of options and I'm not sure which two are the correct ones. I'll have to go through each choice carefully and try to eliminate the ones that don't seem relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know there's a way to display additional metrics, but I can't remember if it's called Drill Down or something else. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
5 months ago
I remember studying that high-net-worth usually indicates individuals with at least $1 million in liquid assets, but it might vary by context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
10 months ago
Wait, so you're telling me an XML document can't have a little line break? What is this, the Stone Age? My toaster has more flexibility than that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
10 months ago
D, really? This doc is as valid as a politician's promise. The attribute value doesn't match the declared options. Nice try, though!
upvoted 0 times
Jose
9 months ago
C) This is not a valid XML document, because the attribute value is not a value listed in the attribute list declaration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
9 months ago
B) This is not a valid XML document, because an attribute cannot be designated for an element that is designated as EMPTY.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
9 months ago
A) This is not a well-formed document, because the attribute value cannot have a line feed in it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mable
10 months ago
Hah, the EMPTY element with an attribute? That's a classic XML blunder. No wonder it's not valid!
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
9 months ago
User 3: Classic XML blunder for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
9 months ago
Lindsey: It's important to follow the rules to ensure the document is valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, it's a common mistake in XML documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, an attribute cannot be designated for an element that is designated as EMPTY.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
10 months ago
User 1: Yeah, that's definitely not valid. Attributes can't be designated for EMPTY elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
10 months ago
User 1: Yeah, that's definitely not a valid XML document.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sean
10 months ago
I agree, the line feed in the attribute value is a problem. This is definitely not a valid XML document.
upvoted 0 times
Aron
9 months ago
Exactly, the attribute value must match one of the listed values for it to be valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
9 months ago
So, that makes this XML document invalid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
9 months ago
Yes, you're right. The attribute value 'ABC' is not listed in the declaration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
9 months ago
I think the attribute value must be one of the listed values in the attribute list declaration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
9 months ago
Exactly, an attribute cannot have a line feed in it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
9 months ago
So, it's not a valid XML document, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
10 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It makes the document not well-formed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
10 months ago
I think the attribute value cannot have a line feed in it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivan
11 months ago
This is not a well-formed document, because the attribute value cannot have a line feed in it. The attribute value should be a single, continuous string.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
10 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
10 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlyn
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the attribute value being listed in the attribute list declaration is also a valid point. So, maybe C could also be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
11 months ago
I agree with you, Fabiola. The attribute cannot be designated for an element that is designated as EMPTY.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel