Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Worldatwork GR1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Worldatwork's GR1 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 2
[All GR1 Questions]

Which method of job evaluation uses a "whole-job" approach to determine the importance of each job to the company?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Desire
4 months ago
I always thought Ranking was more about the whole job too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
4 months ago
Not sure about that, seems a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
4 months ago
Wait, isn't Benchmark also a whole-job approach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
4 months ago
Totally agree, Point factor is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
4 months ago
I think it's the Point factor method!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards Job component, but I recall it being more about specific tasks rather than the whole job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
5 months ago
I feel like Benchmarking could be the answer since it looks at jobs as a whole, but I could be mixing it up with something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
5 months ago
I remember studying the Point factor method, but it seems more detailed than just a whole-job approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
5 months ago
I think the "whole-job" approach might be related to the Ranking method, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is D. Point factor evaluation considers the job as a whole, rather than just looking at individual components or ranking jobs against each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
5 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about point factor evaluation, where you assign points to different aspects of a job. That sounds like it might be a "whole-job" approach, so I'll go with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the differences between these job evaluation methods, but I'll try to eliminate the ones that don't sound like they use a "whole-job" approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
I think this question is asking about the "whole-job" approach to job evaluation, so I'm going to focus on the options that mention evaluating the job as a whole rather than just individual components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
5 months ago
This question looks straightforward. I think implementing Rapid PVST+ and MST would be the best solutions to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know PIM is used to manage privileged access, but I'm not entirely clear on the difference between eligible and active assignments. I'll need to review that before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
6 months ago
Hmm, the wording of this question is a bit confusing. I'll have to read it a few times to make sure I understand what it's asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
6 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about managing repetitive components in a project. I'll think through the options carefully and choose the best one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
6 months ago
Okay, let me see... I think I know the right answer, but I want to double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
10 months ago
Point factor method, huh? Sounds like they're going to give me a bunch of points for being awesome. I'm in!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
10 months ago
Job component? Sounds like they're going to break my job down into tiny little pieces. How about a method that looks at the big picture instead of nitpicking everything?
upvoted 0 times
Trina
9 months ago
B) Ranking
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
9 months ago
I agree, it would be nice to have a method that looks at the big picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
9 months ago
C) Benchmark
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
9 months ago
D) Point factor
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
9 months ago
A) Job component
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dolores
10 months ago
Ranking method? So they're just going to line up all the jobs and say, 'This one's more important than that one'? I need a more detailed analysis than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
10 months ago
Benchmark method? Sounds like they're just comparing my job to some pre-defined standard. I want a more holistic assessment, not just a checklist.
upvoted 0 times
Barrett
9 months ago
Maybe the point factor method would provide a more comprehensive assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
9 months ago
I agree, I prefer a more holistic approach to job evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tora
9 months ago
Yeah, the benchmark method does seem like it's just comparing to a standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
9 months ago
D) Point factor
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
9 months ago
C) Benchmark
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
9 months ago
B) Ranking
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
9 months ago
A) Job component
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrie
10 months ago
I think the Point factor method is the most comprehensive approach to job evaluation, considering the entire job as a whole rather than just individual components.
upvoted 0 times
Mollie
9 months ago
Ranking can be subjective, but it's another method used for job evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
9 months ago
I think Benchmarking is also a good method to determine job importance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
10 months ago
I agree, the Point factor method looks at the job as a whole.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Benchmark could also be a valid option. It compares jobs to external market data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
11 months ago
I agree with Olive. Point factor method considers the entire job, not just specific components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
11 months ago
I think the answer is D) Point factor.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel