MENU
Which method of job evaluation uses a "whole-job" approach to determine the importance of each job to the company?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium GR1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
DE
Desire
11 months ago
I always thought Ranking was more about the whole job too!
CH
Charisse
11 months ago
Not sure about that, seems a bit off to me.
WA
Walton
11 months ago
Wait, isn't Benchmark also a whole-job approach?
AN
Annita
12 months ago
Totally agree, Point factor is the way to go.
FR
Frank
12 months ago
I think it's the Point factor method!
TO
Tomoko
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards Job component, but I recall it being more about specific tasks rather than the whole job.
CA
Carman
1 year ago
I feel like Benchmarking could be the answer since it looks at jobs as a whole, but I could be mixing it up with something else.
RO
Rodolfo
1 year ago
I remember studying the Point factor method, but it seems more detailed than just a whole-job approach.
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
I think the "whole-job" approach might be related to the Ranking method, but I'm not entirely sure.
XU
Xuan
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is D. Point factor evaluation considers the job as a whole, rather than just looking at individual components or ranking jobs against each other.
GA
Gary
1 year ago
Okay, I remember learning about point factor evaluation, where you assign points to different aspects of a job. That sounds like it might be a "whole-job" approach, so I'll go with that one.
LO
Lorenza
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the differences between these job evaluation methods, but I'll try to eliminate the ones that don't sound like they use a "whole-job" approach.
AL
Alaine
1 year ago
I think this question is asking about the "whole-job" approach to job evaluation, so I'm going to focus on the options that mention evaluating the job as a whole rather than just individual components.
RO
Roosevelt
1 year ago
This question looks straightforward. I think implementing Rapid PVST+ and MST would be the best solutions to meet the requirements.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know PIM is used to manage privileged access, but I'm not entirely clear on the difference between eligible and active assignments. I'll need to review that before answering.
RO
Ronna
1 year ago
Hmm, the wording of this question is a bit confusing. I'll have to read it a few times to make sure I understand what it's asking.
HO
Hollis
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about managing repetitive components in a project. I'll think through the options carefully and choose the best one.
EM
Emilio
1 year ago
Okay, let me see... I think I know the right answer, but I want to double-check my understanding.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
Point factor method, huh? Sounds like they're going to give me a bunch of points for being awesome. I'm in!
AL
Alease
1 year ago
Job component? Sounds like they're going to break my job down into tiny little pieces. How about a method that looks at the big picture instead of nitpicking everything?
TR
Trina
1 year ago
B) Ranking
SY
Sylvie
1 year ago
I agree, it would be nice to have a method that looks at the big picture.
EV
Evelynn
1 year ago
C) Benchmark
MI
Mica
1 year ago
D) Point factor
RE
Refugia
1 year ago
A) Job component
DO
Dolores
1 year ago
Ranking method? So they're just going to line up all the jobs and say, 'This one's more important than that one'? I need a more detailed analysis than that.
IS
Isaac
1 year ago
Benchmark method? Sounds like they're just comparing my job to some pre-defined standard. I want a more holistic assessment, not just a checklist.
BA
Barrett
1 year ago
Maybe the point factor method would provide a more comprehensive assessment.
ME
Melissia
1 year ago
I agree, I prefer a more holistic approach to job evaluation.
TO
Tora
1 year ago
Yeah, the benchmark method does seem like it's just comparing to a standard.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
D) Point factor
GE
Genevive
1 year ago
C) Benchmark
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
B) Ranking
NU
Nu
1 year ago
A) Job component
BA
Barrie
1 year ago
I think the Point factor method is the most comprehensive approach to job evaluation, considering the entire job as a whole rather than just individual components.
MO
Mollie
1 year ago
Ranking can be subjective, but it's another method used for job evaluation.
MA
Mabelle
1 year ago
I think Benchmarking is also a good method to determine job importance.
NA
Nadine
1 year ago
I agree, the Point factor method looks at the job as a whole.
AL
Alline
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Benchmark could also be a valid option. It compares jobs to external market data.
VA
Vannessa
2 years ago
I agree with Olive. Point factor method considers the entire job, not just specific components.
OL
Olive
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Point factor.