MENU
Carla's job at the XYZ Company evolved over the many years she worked there. As she gained additional knowledge and skills, her responsibilities expanded into many diverse areas. When the time came to update her job description, her supervisor asked Carla to document all of the duties she performed in her area as well as those she had taken on over the years due to her versatility. Based on the above, which of the following statements is most accurate?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium GR1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
LE
Lezlie
11 months ago
B sounds right, but I wonder if it really reflects all her duties.
CH
Charlesetta
11 months ago
A is totally off; input from employees is crucial!
TA
Taryn
11 months ago
Wait, isn't it weird for Carla to write her own job description?
SA
Sabine
12 months ago
I disagree, C is more accurate.
LA
Lashonda
12 months ago
I think B makes the most sense!
RO
Rory
1 year ago
I feel like option B is definitely a strong choice, but I also see the point in option C about not tying the description too closely to one person. It's tricky!
JU
Justine
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about option A. I thought job descriptions could benefit from employee input, but maybe there's a reason HR usually handles them?
JO
Joana
1 year ago
I remember a practice question that discussed the importance of having input from employees, which makes me lean towards option C. It seems like a balanced approach.
EL
Elin
1 year ago
I think option B makes sense because updating the job description with Carla's duties could reflect her actual role better. But I'm not entirely sure if it's the most accurate.
RO
Rodrigo
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I can see some valid points in a couple of the answer choices, but I'll need to really analyze them to determine which is the most accurate.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll read through the options and consider which one best aligns with the information provided about Carla's situation and the supervisor's request.
FR
Frank
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions Carla's job evolving over time, so I'll need to think carefully about how that impacts the job description.
MI
Micah
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about job descriptions. I'll focus on understanding the key details and then selecting the most accurate statement.
AN
Antione
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this question. The key is recognizing that while employee input can be valuable, the job description should not be overly personalized to the individual currently in the role.
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about the metro area network, but I think it has something to do with the network infrastructure within a city or metropolitan area.
JU
Juliann
1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this one. The date is in the time zone of DBTIMEZONE, and the value varies depending on the setting of SESSIONTIMEZONE.
AS
Asuncion
2 years ago
I'm going with C. Gotta keep that job description future-proof, not just a Carla-shaped mold.
LO
Louisa
1 year ago
Having a job description based solely on one person can limit the potential for growth and change within the role.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
It's important to have input from the job incumbent, but the job description should be more general to allow for flexibility.
MA
Maira
1 year ago
I agree with you, C seems like the most logical choice to ensure the job description is not tied to one specific person.
LA
Lashon
2 years ago
Haha, option A sounds like something a lazy HR rep would say. 'Just leave it to us, we know best!' Riiiight.
JU
Justa
1 year ago
It's a balance though, we don't want the job description to be too specific to just one person.
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Carla's experience should be reflected in the job description.
RI
Rima
1 year ago
Yeah, it's important for Carla to provide input on her own job description.
JA
Janine
1 year ago
I agree, option A seems like a cop-out.
LO
Lorrie
2 years ago
I'd have to disagree with A. Carla's input is valuable, and it would be a shame to ignore her real-world experience.
WI
Winifred
2 years ago
But we should also be careful not to make the job description too specific to Carla. It should still be relevant for any future employees in that role.
CA
Cathrine
2 years ago
I agree with Lashaunda. Carla's input will make the job description more accurate and reflective of the actual duties performed.
TH
Thersa
2 years ago
B seems like the best choice. Carla's expanded responsibilities should be reflected in the updated job description to make it more accurate and comprehensive.
AN
Annita
1 year ago
Having Carla contribute to the job description will definitely make it more relevant and comprehensive. It's a good idea to include her input.
KR
Kristofer
1 year ago
I agree, B does seem like the best choice. It's important for the job description to accurately reflect Carla's expanded responsibilities.
LA
Lashaunda
2 years ago
I think the supervisor did the right thing by asking Carla to contribute to the job description.
NI
Nina
2 years ago
I'd go with option C. Carla's input is helpful, but the job description should focus on the role, not just the individual currently filling it.
MA
Mariann
2 years ago
But we should also be careful not to make the job description too specific to Carla. Option C makes a good point.
GE
Georgene
2 years ago
I agree with Aide. Carla's experience and knowledge should be reflected in the job description.
AI
Aide
2 years ago
I think option B is the most accurate. Carla's input will make the job description more relevant.