New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Workday-Pro-Integrations Exam - Topic 5 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Workday's Workday-Pro-Integrations exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 5
[All Workday-Pro-Integrations Questions]

You have been asked to create an integration using the Core Connector: Worker with DIS template. The vendor has requested that you only include employees who are based in the San Francisco area that are on leave.

How do you configure your integration so that only workers who meet the requirements are included in the output file?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When using Core Connector: Worker with DIS, to restrict the population to employees who:

Are on leave, and

Are located in San Francisco

You must configure Population Eligibility, which is the only place to filter the worker population included in the connector output.

From Workday Pro documentation:

''The Population Eligibility section defines which workers are eligible for extraction in the integration based on location, status, organization, and other conditions. Boolean calculated fields can be used here to define complex eligibility criteria.''

In this case:

Create a Boolean calculated field that returns true for ''On Leave AND Location = San Francisco''

Use that field in Population Eligibility

Why the others are incorrect:

A, D. Field Overrides and Field Attributes only modify what data is extracted---not who is included.

C . Integration Attributes don't control population filtering.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Regenia
12 hours ago
This question is making my brain hurt. I'm just going to go with Option B and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
6 days ago
Option D is the way to go. Boolean fields are the secret sauce of integration success!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
11 days ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm going to go with Option C and hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
16 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Gotta love that Population Eligibility field!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
21 days ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
26 days ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Straight to the point!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
1 month ago
I definitely remember that we need to filter for location and leave status, but I’m torn between options A and D for how to set that up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 month ago
I feel like option B sounds right because it mentions Population Eligibility, but I'm not entirely confident about how that ties into the integration setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 month ago
I think we need to focus on the attributes for the workers, but I'm not sure if it's option C or D that specifically mentions the integration attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this. I'll go with option C and configure the integration attributes to pull in only the San Francisco-based workers who are on leave. That way, I can easily filter the data to meet the vendor's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
2 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should be creating a new Boolean field or using the existing fields in the integration. I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure I'm approaching this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
2 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to filter the workers based on their location and leave status. Option C looks like the best approach - I'll configure the integration attributes to only include the San Francisco-based employees who are currently on leave.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 months ago
I think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
2 months ago
I think option C is the best. It directly targets the workers we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
3 months ago
Option A is the clear winner here. Boolean fields are the way of the future!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
3 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think configuring a Boolean field is important, but I can't recall if it should be for field overrides or field attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Do I need to create a custom Boolean field for this, or can I just use the existing fields in the integration? I'm not sure if option A, B, or D is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I'll go with option C and configure the integration attributes to include only the workers in San Francisco who are on leave.
upvoted 0 times
Leatha
2 months ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel