Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Workday-Pro-Integrations Exam - Topic 4 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Tricia on Apr 06, 2026 at 06:14 PM

A vendor needs an EIB that uses a custom report to output a list of new hires and their child dependent(s). You have been asked to create a calculated field that will be used to add only child dependent(s).

Which calculated field functions do you need to accomplish this?

Suggested Answer: D

In this case, you're asked to create a calculated field that:

Filters dependent records

Includes only child relationships

This means:

The worker has multiple dependents (a multi-instance field).

You need to extract only those dependent(s) where the relationship is ''Child''.

To achieve this in Workday, use:

True/False Condition check if the relationship descriptor = 'Child'

Extract Multi-Instance filters the multi-instance field (Dependents) using the above condition to return only matching records

This two-step logic filters multi-instance relationships correctly.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A and B are missing Extract Multi-Instance, which is required to filter multi-values.

C includes Text Constant unnecessarily --- only True/False Condition and Extract Multi-Instance are required.


Get Premium Workday-Pro-Integrations Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
HE
Henriette 1 month ago
I think B is too simple. We need more functions for this task.
DO
Dorothy 1 month ago
I agree with D. We need to focus on child dependents only.
IS
Isaac 1 month ago
I’m not sure about A. True/False Condition is definitely needed.
LU
Luther 2 months ago
I lean towards A. Text Constant could help with specific outputs.
CA
Catalina 2 months ago
I feel like option D makes sense. Extract Multi-Instance is key.
JE
Jeannetta 2 months ago
This question is tricky! I think it’s about filtering dependents.
TO
Tony 2 months ago
C seems right for handling multiple dependents.
BE
Beata 2 months ago
I like option D too. True/False is essential for filtering.
JO
Jordan 2 months ago
I think B is the simplest and most effective choice.
LA
Lanie 3 months ago
I feel like A is too complex for this task.
SH
Shelia 3 months ago
I agree, but I lean towards option C. Extract Multi-Instance is key.
RE
Remona 3 months ago
This question is tricky! I think option D makes sense.
OR
Oren 3 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question. Thought it’d be more complex!
AN
Andrew 3 months ago
B seems too simple for this task. Gotta have more functions!
QU
Quentin 4 months ago
Wait, can you really use Extract Multi-Instance without a Text Constant? Seems off.
TA
Tamra 5 months ago
I disagree, I’d go with A. You need that Text Constant too.
CA
Carole 5 months ago
I think it's definitely D! Extract Multi-Instance is key here.
AR
Arlette 6 months ago
I recall that Extract Multi-Instance is useful for handling multiple records, so maybe it’s crucial for this question. I just can’t remember if we need the Text Constant as well.
MA
Martin 6 months ago
I feel like Text Constant might not be necessary here since we’re focusing on dependents. I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m not completely confident.
AN
An 6 months ago
I think the True/False Condition is definitely needed, but I’m torn between whether to include Evaluate Expression or Extract Multi-Instance.
JA
Jannette 6 months ago
I remember we practiced a similar question about calculated fields, but I’m not sure if we used Extract Multi-Instance for child dependents.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel