The population of fish in a lake is changing according to the function
where is the number of months since the beginning of the year and is the fish population at time .
Which interpretation of the rate of change is correct?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium Applied Algebra (C957) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The function is:
This is a linear function in the form:
where:
and
In this function:
The negative sign means the fish population is decreasing.
The number tells us the amount of decrease per month.
So the fish population is decreasing by:
The value is not the rate of change. It represents the starting fish population at the beginning of the year, when :
Therefore, the correct interpretation is:
So the correct answer is:
12 comments · newest first
MA
Mable
3 days ago
C sounds right. A steady increase is good for biodiversity.
GO
Goldie
8 days ago
I disagree, it could be B. Overfishing is a concern.
CA
Catalina
13 days ago
I think it's A. More fish means a healthy lake!
NA
Nadine
18 days ago
I agree, 462 fish is a lot!
PE
Penney
23 days ago
35 fish per month? Sounds too low to me.
AN
Annelle
29 days ago
I’m not sure about that, 462 seems way too high.
RO
Rosio
1 month ago
No way, it’s definitely decreasing at 35 fish per month.
MA
Matthew
1 month ago
I think the population is increasing by 462 fish per month!
AN
Anthony
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards option D because I think we talked about how populations can decrease over time, but I’m not entirely sure about the numbers.
SH
Sheridan
2 months ago
I feel like the rate of 462 fish per month was mentioned in class, but I can't remember if it was an increase or a decrease. That part is really confusing!
ME
Merlyn
2 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the rate was clearly defined. If I recall correctly, it was about 35 fish per month, but I can't remember if that was an increase or decrease.
DE
Derick
2 months ago
I remember that we discussed how to interpret the rate of change in population functions, but I'm not sure if it's increasing or decreasing here.