Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

WELL AP Exam WELL-AP Topic 2 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for WELL AP's WELL-AP exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 2
[All WELL-AP Questions]

A WELL AP is working on a renovation project in an existing building that is suspected to contain lead paint.

To confirm that the paint contains lead, the WELL AP requests in-situ testing. Which one of the following types of tests is acceptable to confirm the lead hazard?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Supporting Evidence:WELL features often require specific design elements or operational protocols to be met. Annotated plans, drawings, or specifications provide clear evidence demonstrating how the project meets these requirements.

Feature-Specific Requirements:Each feature has its own verification methods in the WELL Building Standard. Annotated documents are particularly important for features with visual or spatial requirements.

Clarity for Reviewers:Annotations highlight crucial details, making review more efficient for the WELL assessors. They demonstrate that the project team has carefully considered and implemented the specific requirements.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Salena
25 days ago
I was going to suggest using a dowsing rod, but I guess the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is the more scientifically sound option. Though it's not as much fun as chasing ghosts with a Ghostbusters proton pack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
27 days ago
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is the clear choice here. It's like a high-tech metal detector for lead, and who doesn't love a good treasure hunt?
upvoted 0 times
Lisandra
4 days ago
User 1: X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is definitely the way to go for confirming lead paint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
1 months ago
I'm going with X-ray fluorescence (XRF) on this one. It's like a superhero for lead detection - fast, powerful, and doesn't leave a mess behind.
upvoted 0 times
Charlena
10 days ago
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is definitely the way to go. It's quick and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colette
1 months ago
Ooh, the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) test sounds like a real winner to me. I bet it can see through lead paint faster than Superman can see through a brick wall.
upvoted 0 times
Denna
15 days ago
User 2: I agree, it's a quick and effective method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
1 months ago
User 1: X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is a great choice for testing lead paint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
2 months ago
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is definitely the way to go! It's quick, accurate, and non-destructive. Perfect for confirming lead in existing paint.
upvoted 0 times
Lynette
23 days ago
I've used XRF before and it's a great tool for identifying lead hazards in buildings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
27 days ago
XRF is non-destructive and provides quick and accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 months ago
It's definitely a reliable and efficient method for in-situ testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
1 months ago
I agree, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is the best option for confirming lead in existing paint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hannah
2 months ago
Well, I think XRF is more commonly used and provides accurate results quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe Polarized light microscopy (PLM) is the correct test for confirming lead hazard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
2 months ago
I think the acceptable test to confirm lead hazard is X-ray fluorescence (XRF).
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
a