Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-93.22 Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-93.22 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All 5V0-93.22 Questions]

A company wants to prevent an executable from running in their organization. The current reputation for the file is NOT LISTED, and the machines are in the default standard policy.

Which action should be taken to prevent the file from executing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Fanny at Jul 01, 2024, 11:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-93.22 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jenifer
5 months ago
Totally agree with D, prevention is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
Wait, can we really trust the hash method? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
5 months ago
A is a solid choice too, but it might not be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
5 months ago
I think C is better, just delete it outright!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
6 months ago
Definitely go with D, adding to the banned list is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the options. Killing the process seems like a temporary fix, but I don't know if that's enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like adding the hash to the banned list is the right move to stop it from executing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
I think using Live Response to delete the file could work, but it might not prevent it from running again later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
6 months ago
I remember something about adding hashes to lists, but I'm not sure if it should be the MALWARE list or the banned list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
6 months ago
Option D to add the hash to the company's banned list seems like the safest bet here. That way we can block the file without having to use Live Response, which could be riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
6 months ago
I think the key is that the file's reputation is "NOT LISTED", so adding it to a banned list or malware list seems like the best approach to prevent it from executing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Should we use Live Response to kill the process or delete the file instead? I'm not sure which option is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
7 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'd go with option A to add the hash to the malware list and block the file from running.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like using snippets and adding my own comments could be a good approach. It seems more ethical?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
7 months ago
Based on my understanding, APPI applies to both government entities and businesses that use personal information. I'm pretty confident that B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. The options seem pretty similar, so I'll need to really analyze the differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
11 months ago
Option A? Seriously? What is this, a 'spot the malware' game? Just add the hash to the banned list and call it a day, folks. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
Bobbye
10 months ago
Definitely, keeping it simple is the way to go in situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
10 months ago
Yeah, no need to play games with it. Just block it and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
11 months ago
I agree, adding the hash to the banned list is the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terry
12 months ago
I'm with Timmy on this one. Option D is the clear winner. Adding the hash to the banned list is the most straightforward and effective way to prevent the file from running. No need to get all 'Mission Impossible' with it.
upvoted 0 times
Reta
10 months ago
Let's just go with option D and be done with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
11 months ago
Yeah, adding the hash to the banned list seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
11 months ago
I agree, option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
12 months ago
Haha, option B is like the IT version of a nuclear option. 'Oh, you want to run that file? Let me just KILL the entire process instead!' Definitely not the subtlest approach.
upvoted 0 times
Tom
11 months ago
User 3: Or just deleting the file using Live Response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
11 months ago
User 2: I agree, maybe adding the hash to the banned list would be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
11 months ago
User 1: Yeah, option B does seem a bit extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
12 months ago
Option C seems a bit extreme, don't you think? Deleting the file could potentially cause issues if it's a legitimate program. I'd go with option D to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
1 year ago
I think option D is the way to go. Adding the hash to the company's banned list is the most effective way to prevent the file from executing without having to resort to more drastic measures like deleting the file or killing the process.
upvoted 0 times
Graham
11 months ago
D: Let's go ahead and add the hash to the banned list then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
12 months ago
C: It's a proactive approach to security, better safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
12 months ago
B: Yeah, that way we can prevent the file from executing without causing any disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
12 months ago
A: I agree, adding the hash to the company's banned list seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
1 year ago
I'm not sure, maybe using Live Response to delete the file could also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
1 year ago
I agree with Eric, adding the hash to the banned list seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 year ago
I think we should add the hash to the company banned list.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel