New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 6 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 6
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

Due to the success of the recently deployed developer-only private cloud solution, a company has a new requirement to at least double the usable capacity in their all-flash vSAN cluster.

The vSAN cluster is deployed into a co-located datacenter that is owned by a third-party hosting company. The hosting company charges a fixed monthly cost for rack space and power consumption. The service owner has been given a limited budget for additional hardware purchases, but not for on-going co-location costs.

The current vSAN cluster has the following configuration:

* 10 vSAN Nodes with 2 CPUs (20 cores), 512 GB RAM

* 1 Disk Group per vSAN node

- 1 x 400 GB

- 4 x 1.8 TB

* De-duplication and Compression is enabled.

* vSAN Capacity is currently:

- Total: 72 TB

- Usable: ~40 TB (FTT1/RAID1) and ~60 TB (FTT1/RAID5).

As a result of any action taken, the service owner would like to ensure that overall availability of the vSAN cluster is increased.

Which two recommendations meet the requirement to increase capacity while maintaining service availability? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

by Noah at May 03, 2022, 02:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-21.21 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ernie
4 months ago
A is a bit overkill for the budget, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
4 months ago
D could work, but not sure if it’s enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
4 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention upgrading to larger SSDs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
4 months ago
I think B is a better choice, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
5 months ago
Option C seems solid for increasing capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
5 months ago
I recall that replacing existing drives can sometimes lead to downtime, so I’m hesitant about option E. I think we should focus on adding drives instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to balance capacity and availability. I’m leaning towards options A and C, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
5 months ago
I think installing additional drives is a good idea, but we need to ensure that it doesn't compromise availability. I feel like option C might be the best choice for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
I remember that adding more SSDs could definitely help increase capacity, but I'm not sure if we should create a new Disk Group or just update the existing one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The problem is that the link is missing the .html extension, so the fix is probably to just add that to the end of the URL. I'm going to go with Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. T-Lib messages can be mapped to all the SIP messages, except one. I'll need to carefully review the options to determine which one doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Backlight compensation? I feel like it's related to lighting issues, but doesn't really fit the motion blur problem.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel