Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 5
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

A 4-node vSAN cluster is configured with an erasure coding storage policy. The Ensure Accessibility maintenance mode was selected. While performing the maintenance, a second node fails.

What will be the impact on the vSAN cluster?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mariann
5 months ago
No impact on performance? That sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
5 months ago
Performance will definitely be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
5 months ago
I agree, especially with a second node down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
6 months ago
The VMs will no longer be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
6 months ago
I thought there was a chance that performance would be unaffected if the cluster was in Ensure Accessibility mode. But now I'm questioning that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
6 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we discussed maintenance modes. I think the VMs would be in a suspended state if two nodes fail, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like performance could degrade if a second node fails during maintenance. It seems like a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
6 months ago
I remember reading that with erasure coding, losing a second node could really impact accessibility. I think the VMs might not be accessible anymore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the performance will be degraded in this scenario, since the cluster is now operating with reduced redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. With the Ensure Accessibility mode selected, the cluster should be able to tolerate the second node failure without impacting VM accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the impact of the second node failure in an erasure-coded vSAN cluster. Let me re-read the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
7 months ago
This one seems tricky. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
11 months ago
Suspended VMs? That sounds like a great way to take a nap during the exam. Where do I sign up?
upvoted 0 times
Marshall
10 months ago
C: A) There will be no impact on performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
11 months ago
B: C) The performance will be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
A: B) The VMs will no longer be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audra
12 months ago
Hold up, no impact on performance? That can't be right, the cluster's one node short now. I'm going with C, performance is going downhill from here.
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
11 months ago
User3: I'm with User2, performance is definitely going downhill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
11 months ago
User2: I disagree, I believe the performance will be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
11 months ago
User1: I think there will be no impact on performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
12 months ago
Suspended VMs? That's a new one! I doubt that's what's going to happen. I'm leaning towards C for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Soledad
10 months ago
Let's hope it doesn't affect the VMs too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
11 months ago
I agree, it's likely that the performance will be impacted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
11 months ago
I think the performance will be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
12 months ago
Uh oh, if a second node fails, that's not good news. The VMs better not become inaccessible! I'll go with B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Marion
10 months ago
Let's hope that the vSAN cluster can handle the second node failure without impacting VM accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
10 months ago
If the VMs become inaccessible, it could cause a lot of problems for the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
10 months ago
I agree, it's crucial to ensure the VMs remain accessible during maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
10 months ago
I think B is the correct answer too. Losing accessibility to the VMs would be a major issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
1 year ago
Hmm, with a 4-node vSAN cluster in Ensure Accessibility mode, the loss of a second node is definitely going to impact performance. I think C is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
But what if the erasure coding storage policy helps maintain accessibility even with a second node failure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
1 year ago
I agree with Lashunda, if a second node fails during maintenance, the VMs will not be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
1 year ago
I think the impact will be that the VMs will no longer be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel