Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

A 4-node vSAN cluster is configured with an erasure coding storage policy. The Ensure Accessibility maintenance mode was selected. While performing the maintenance, a second node fails.What will be the impact on the vSAN cluster?
C) The performance will be degraded. and D) The VMs will be in a suspended state.
A) There will be no impact on performance.
B) The VMs will no longer be accessible.

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 5
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

A 4-node vSAN cluster is configured with an erasure coding storage policy. The Ensure Accessibility maintenance mode was selected. While performing the maintenance, a second node fails.

What will be the impact on the vSAN cluster?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mariann
6 months ago
No impact on performance? That sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
6 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
7 months ago
Performance will definitely be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
7 months ago
I agree, especially with a second node down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
7 months ago
The VMs will no longer be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
7 months ago
I thought there was a chance that performance would be unaffected if the cluster was in Ensure Accessibility mode. But now I'm questioning that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
8 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we discussed maintenance modes. I think the VMs would be in a suspended state if two nodes fail, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like performance could degrade if a second node fails during maintenance. It seems like a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
8 months ago
I remember reading that with erasure coding, losing a second node could really impact accessibility. I think the VMs might not be accessible anymore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the performance will be degraded in this scenario, since the cluster is now operating with reduced redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. With the Ensure Accessibility mode selected, the cluster should be able to tolerate the second node failure without impacting VM accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the impact of the second node failure in an erasure-coded vSAN cluster. Let me re-read the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
8 months ago
This one seems tricky. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 year ago
Suspended VMs? That sounds like a great way to take a nap during the exam. Where do I sign up?
upvoted 0 times
Marshall
12 months ago
C: A) There will be no impact on performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
1 year ago
B: C) The performance will be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 year ago
A: B) The VMs will no longer be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audra
1 year ago
Hold up, no impact on performance? That can't be right, the cluster's one node short now. I'm going with C, performance is going downhill from here.
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
1 year ago
User3: I'm with User2, performance is definitely going downhill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
1 year ago
User2: I disagree, I believe the performance will be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
1 year ago
User1: I think there will be no impact on performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
1 year ago
Suspended VMs? That's a new one! I doubt that's what's going to happen. I'm leaning towards C for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Soledad
12 months ago
Let's hope it doesn't affect the VMs too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
1 year ago
I agree, it's likely that the performance will be impacted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
I think the performance will be degraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
Uh oh, if a second node fails, that's not good news. The VMs better not become inaccessible! I'll go with B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Marion
12 months ago
Let's hope that the vSAN cluster can handle the second node failure without impacting VM accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
12 months ago
If the VMs become inaccessible, it could cause a lot of problems for the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
12 months ago
I agree, it's crucial to ensure the VMs remain accessible during maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
12 months ago
I think B is the correct answer too. Losing accessibility to the VMs would be a major issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
1 year ago
Hmm, with a 4-node vSAN cluster in Ensure Accessibility mode, the loss of a second node is definitely going to impact performance. I think C is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
But what if the erasure coding storage policy helps maintain accessibility even with a second node failure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
1 year ago
I agree with Lashunda, if a second node fails during maintenance, the VMs will not be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
1 year ago
I think the impact will be that the VMs will no longer be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel