Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 3 Question 95 Discussion

Posted by Kimi on May 03, 2026 at 04:18 AM

data centers, the customer relayed the following information:

* Highest possible mitigation during a host failure in terms of capacity.

* A constraint in this year's IT budget.

What should the architect recommend?

Suggested Answer: B

Performance services and IOinsight Metrics used for performance analysis. Operation reserve for internal VSAN operations. https://blogs.vmware.com/virtualblocks/2020/09/24/effective-capacity-management-with-vsan-7-update-1/


Get Premium 5V0-21.21 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
TO
Toshia 3 days ago
Option D is interesting, but only two nodes might not provide enough capacity.
JO
Joesph 8 days ago
Option C seems excessive. Six nodes? That’s way over budget!
MA
Margart 13 days ago
I agree with Domitila. A minimum of three nodes is a good balance.
KA
Kate 18 days ago
But we have a budget constraint. Four nodes in option B might be too much.
DO
Domitila 23 days ago
I think option A is the best. Three nodes should cover the host failure well.
TO
Tonette 28 days ago
A is straightforward and meets the requirements without breaking the bank.
RO
Roxane 1 month ago
I feel B is risky. We can't overspend this year.
CL
Clorinda 1 month ago
A minimum of three nodes is a solid choice for reliability.
EL
Elenore 1 month ago
Option D is too limited. Two nodes won't handle much.
LO
Louvenia 2 months ago
I agree with A. It balances capacity and cost effectively.
RO
Rolande 2 months ago
Option C seems overkill. Six nodes? Not feasible with our budget.
KR
Kristofer 2 months ago
But we have a budget constraint. Four nodes in option B might be too much.
CH
Chantay 2 months ago
I think option A is the best. Three nodes should cover host failures.
AD
Adolph 2 months ago
Wait, are we sure 2 nodes is enough for ROBO?
DA
Daniel 2 months ago
D might be too light on capacity for a host failure.
JE
Jesusita 3 months ago
C seems excessive, 6 nodes? Really?
RE
Ressie 3 months ago
I think B is too much for the budget constraints.
TA
Tamar 3 months ago
Option A sounds solid for host failure!
LU
Luther 3 months ago
I vaguely recall that enabling performance services might require more nodes, but I don't think that's the best option given the budget issue.
MI
Ming 3 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where 4 nodes were recommended, but I can't remember the specifics about the budget constraints.
IO
Iola 4 months ago
I think enabling operations reserve makes sense for capacity during a host failure, but I can't recall if 3 nodes is enough.
FL
Floyd 4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having enough nodes for redundancy, but I'm not sure if 3 or 4 is the right number for this scenario.
LA
Lavonda 4 months ago
I vaguely remember that performance services require more nodes, but I don't think that's the priority here with the budget issue.
TE
Tequila 5 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where budget constraints were a factor, and I think 4 nodes might be too much given the budget.
AM
Amber 6 months ago
I think enabling operations reserve makes sense for capacity during a host failure, but I can't recall if 3 nodes is enough for that.
CA
Caprice 6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having enough nodes for redundancy, but I'm not sure if 3 or 4 is the right number here.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel