New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 5V0-21.21 Exam - Topic 2 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-21.21 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 2
[All 5V0-21.21 Questions]

An architect intends to use the Primary Level of Failures To Tolerate (PFTT) to calculate the minimum number of required hosts for a vSAN cluster.

Which calculation model should be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/7.0/com.vmware.vsphere.vsan-planning.doc/GUID-57575456-0AD9-4655-9D6B-58509C1DF33C.html


by Vilma at Mar 20, 2024, 02:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-21.21 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nathan
3 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question. Isn’t it obvious?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? I thought it was D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
3 months ago
I always go with C. 1 * PFTT + 2 just feels safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
4 months ago
Nah, I’m pretty sure it’s B. You need the extra hosts for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
4 months ago
I think it's A, right? 1 * PFTT + 1 seems standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
4 months ago
I remember that the PFTT calculations can be tricky. I think it might be option B, but I need to double-check if it’s 2 * PFTT + 1 or 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
4 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I feel like the formula should include a +1 or +2 at the end. I just can't remember which one it was.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
4 months ago
I recall practicing a similar question where we had to factor in redundancy, and I think it was 2 * PFTT + 2 that made sense for ensuring enough hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
5 months ago
I think the calculation for the minimum number of hosts might involve adding a certain number based on the PFTT, but I can't remember if it's just one or two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. The formula should be 1 * PFTT + 1, since that's the most common way to calculate the minimum number of hosts based on the PFTT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the PFTT terminology here. I'll need to review my notes on vSAN cluster design to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the PFTT concept carefully to determine the right calculation model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking about the formula to calculate the minimum number of hosts based on the PFTT, so I'll need to choose the option that matches that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The command to build a container image is docker build. That's the one I'm going to select for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
5 months ago
I think the answer is A. The question mentions the ACCS Dashboard, so the status of the IP Office connection should be under the Contact Center Server Configuration, SIP, and Network Settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure. I remember diversity of team members is important, so option D seems correct. But which one could be false?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
5 months ago
I think Corda is more about privacy and permissioned access, which seems closer to need-to-know blockchain data, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
2 years ago
That's an interesting point, but I still think A) 1 * PFTT + 1 is sufficient for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
2 years ago
I disagree, I think the correct calculation model is B) 2 * PFTT + 2 because it provides more redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
2 years ago
I believe the correct calculation model is A) 1 * PFTT + 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 years ago
I agree with you, but which calculation model do you think is the correct one to use?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
2 years ago
I think we should use the Primary Level of Failures To Tolerate for calculating hosts in vSAN cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
2 years ago
I think B) 2 * PFTT + 2 might be more appropriate, as it provides a greater level of redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
2 years ago
I believe the correct calculation model is A) 1 * PFTT + 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
2 years ago
So, what calculation model do you think should be used for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to calculate the minimum number of required hosts accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
2 years ago
I think the architect should use the Primary Level of Failures To Tolerate (PFTT) for vSAN.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel