Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 3V0-32.23 Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

An architect is designing the deployment of VMware Aria Operations for Logs for a customer. The following information is provided:Three on-premises DNS servers: dns01.rainpole.local, dns02.rainpole.local and dns03.rainpole.local.Configure VMware Aria Operations for Logs to support on-prem redundancy in consuming DNS services.What design decision would the architect choose to achieve the requirement?
C) Configure VMware Aria Operations for Logs instance to use dns01.rainpole.local, dns02.rainpole.local and dns03.rainpole.local.
A) Configure VMware Aria Operations for Logs instance to use dns02.rainpole.local only.
B) Configure VMware Aria Operations for Logs instance to use a public DNS server and dns01.rainpole.local.
D) Configure VMware Aria Operations for Logs instance to use dns01.rainpole.local and dns03.rainpole.local only.

VMware 3V0-32.23 Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 3V0-32.23 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All 3V0-32.23 Questions]

An architect is designing the deployment of VMware Aria Operations for Logs for a customer. The following information is provided:

Three on-premises DNS servers: dns01.rainpole.local, dns02.rainpole.local and dns03.rainpole.local.

Configure VMware Aria Operations for Logs to support on-prem redundancy in consuming DNS services.

What design decision would the architect choose to achieve the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Configuring all three on-premises DNS servers provides redundancy, ensuring that DNS services remain available even if one or two servers fail, which meets the on-premises redundancy requirement.


by Georgeanna at Nov 25, 2025, 01:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 3V0-32.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Denny
3 months ago
D is too limited. We need all three for proper redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
4 months ago
I like C too. It covers all bases for DNS services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
4 months ago
Option B is not ideal. Public DNS can be unreliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
4 months ago
Option A seems risky. What if dns02 goes down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
4 months ago
I’m surprised they didn’t mention load balancing options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
4 months ago
Definitely going with C, all three servers should be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
5 months ago
I think B is risky, public DNS can be unreliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
Option C is the best choice for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
5 months ago
I'm just here for the dad jokes. Did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
5 months ago
C is the way to do it. Redundancy is the name of the game when it comes to DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
6 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking B, but C makes more sense. Can't have a single point of failure, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
6 months ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. Gotta have that redundancy, yo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
6 months ago
C) is the way to go. Redundancy is key, and using all three on-prem DNS servers is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
6 months ago
I feel like option D could work, but it doesn't utilize all available resources, which seems less optimal for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose multiple DNS servers for redundancy, and I think option C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option B could be risky since relying on a public DNS server might introduce latency or availability issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
7 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of redundancy in DNS configurations, so I think using all three DNS servers might be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Using all three on-prem DNS servers seems like the best way to ensure redundancy and reliability in the DNS services consumed by VMware Aria Operations for Logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
7 months ago
Agreed! Using all three DNS servers ensures no single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The requirement is for on-prem redundancy, so I'm not sure if using a public DNS server in option B is the right approach. I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
7 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Redundancy is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
8 months ago
Wait, why not just use dns02 alone? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the design decision to achieve redundancy in consuming DNS services. I think C might be the best option since it uses all three on-prem DNS servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around on-prem redundancy and how the DNS servers are configured.
upvoted 0 times
Markus
3 months ago
I wouldn't risk it with just one server. C is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
3 months ago
But what about option B? Public DNS could be a backup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
3 months ago
Agreed! Using all three DNS servers is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
3 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. Redundancy is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
8 months ago
True, but we need on-prem redundancy first. C is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel