New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 3V0-32.23 Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 3V0-32.23 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All 3V0-32.23 Questions]

An architect is designing the deployment of VMware Aria Operations for Logs for a customer. The following information is provided:

Three on-premises DNS servers: dns01.rainpole.local, dns02.rainpole.local and dns03.rainpole.local.

Configure VMware Aria Operations for Logs to support on-prem redundancy in consuming DNS services.

What design decision would the architect choose to achieve the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Configuring all three on-premises DNS servers provides redundancy, ensuring that DNS services remain available even if one or two servers fail, which meets the on-premises redundancy requirement.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rachael
9 hours ago
I think B is risky, public DNS can be unreliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
6 days ago
Option C is the best choice for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
11 days ago
I'm just here for the dad jokes. Did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
16 days ago
C is the way to do it. Redundancy is the name of the game when it comes to DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
21 days ago
Hmm, I was thinking B, but C makes more sense. Can't have a single point of failure, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
26 days ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. Gotta have that redundancy, yo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
1 month ago
C) is the way to go. Redundancy is key, and using all three on-prem DNS servers is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 month ago
I feel like option D could work, but it doesn't utilize all available resources, which seems less optimal for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose multiple DNS servers for redundancy, and I think option C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option B could be risky since relying on a public DNS server might introduce latency or availability issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of redundancy in DNS configurations, so I think using all three DNS servers might be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Using all three on-prem DNS servers seems like the best way to ensure redundancy and reliability in the DNS services consumed by VMware Aria Operations for Logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
Agreed! Using all three DNS servers ensures no single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The requirement is for on-prem redundancy, so I'm not sure if using a public DNS server in option B is the right approach. I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Redundancy is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
3 months ago
Wait, why not just use dns02 alone? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the design decision to achieve redundancy in consuming DNS services. I think C might be the best option since it uses all three on-prem DNS servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
3 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around on-prem redundancy and how the DNS servers are configured.
upvoted 0 times
Brinda
3 months ago
True, but we need on-prem redundancy first. C is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel