New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 2V0-32.24 Exam - Topic 6 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-32.24 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 6
[All 2V0-32.24 Questions]

In vRealize Operations, a user applies a CPU License to a custom group which has existing hosts.

How will the Virtual Machines (VMs) on the existing hosts be affected?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When a CPU license is applied to a custom group in vRealize Operations, it impacts the hosts but does not directly affect the Virtual Machines (VMs) running on those hosts. The license is applied at the host level, and the VMs are not impacted by this change. The VMs will continue to run as they were, and no additional VM licenses are required.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jaclyn
2 months ago
No way, D is definitely a possibility!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
2 months ago
I agree, B seems correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
2 months ago
The VMs running on the hosts are not affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
3 months ago
Wait, how can that be? Sounds too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
3 months ago
I think it's A, the license gets converted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
3 months ago
I really hope the VMs don’t show a 'License is Invalid' watermark; that would be a hassle to deal with!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
3 months ago
I feel like there was something about licenses prompting for VM keys, but I can't recall if that was in vRealize or another tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where applying a CPU license didn't change anything for the VMs, so maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
I think the VMs on the existing hosts might not be affected at all, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
4 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The CPU license is just applied to the hosts, so the VMs running on those hosts shouldn't be impacted. I'm going with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
4 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. Does the CPU license somehow get converted to a VM license? That's the only way I can see option A being correct. Otherwise, I think B is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
4 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the CPU license is applied to the custom group, I don't think the VMs would be affected directly. So I'm leaning towards option B as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm thinking it might be option C, where vRealize prompts for a VM license, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is option B. The CPU license should just apply to the hosts, and not affect the VMs running on them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
8 months ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts show a 'License is Invalid' watermark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
8 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe vRealize Operations prompts the user to apply a VM license key to the VMs running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
8 months ago
I believe the CPU license gets converted to a CPU and VM license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
8 months ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts will be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
8 months ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts will show a 'License is Invalid' watermark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
8 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe vRealize Operations prompts the user to apply a VM license key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
8 months ago
I believe the CPU license will get converted to a CPU and VM license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
8 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is actually E) All of the above. vRealize Operations is so complex, it probably does all of those things!
upvoted 0 times
Katheryn
7 months ago
Merlyn: Haha, I bet the answer is actually E) All of the above!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
7 months ago
User 3: Maybe the CPU license gets converted to a CPU and VM license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
7 months ago
User 2: No, I believe vRealize Operations prompts the user to apply a VM license key to the VMs running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
8 months ago
User 1: I think the VMs running on the hosts are not affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
8 months ago
User 3: Yeah, vRealize Operations doesn't mess with the VMs when you apply a CPU License to a custom group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
8 months ago
User 2: Mozelle is correct. The answer is B) The VMs running on the hosts are not affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
8 months ago
User 1: I think the VMs running on the hosts are not affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruby
9 months ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts will be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
9 months ago
I'm going with C. vRealize Operations should prompt the user to apply a VM license if the CPU license doesn't cover the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaun
8 months ago
I agree with you. B seems like the most logical option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
8 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The VMs running on the hosts should not be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donte
9 months ago
D seems like the most logical answer. The VMs would show a license invalid watermark if the CPU license doesn't cover them.
upvoted 0 times
Twila
8 months ago
User 4: It's important to make sure the licenses cover all the VMs to avoid any problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
8 months ago
User 3: So, applying a CPU license to a custom group with existing hosts can cause issues with VM licensing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, if the CPU license doesn't cover the VMs, they will show a 'License is Invalid' watermark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
9 months ago
User 1: I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salina
10 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The CPU license should just apply to the hosts without affecting the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
Malinda
8 months ago
User3: Agreed. The VMs running on the hosts should continue to run without any impact from the CPU license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
8 months ago
User2: That makes sense. It wouldn't make sense for the VMs to be affected by just applying a CPU license to the hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
8 months ago
User1: I think B is the correct answer. The CPU license should just apply to the hosts without affecting the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel