Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 2V0-32.24 Topic 6 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-32.24 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 6
[All 2V0-32.24 Questions]

In vRealize Operations, a user applies a CPU License to a custom group which has existing hosts.

How will the Virtual Machines (VMs) on the existing hosts be affected?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When a CPU license is applied to a custom group in vRealize Operations, it impacts the hosts but does not directly affect the Virtual Machines (VMs) running on those hosts. The license is applied at the host level, and the VMs are not impacted by this change. The VMs will continue to run as they were, and no additional VM licenses are required.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Estrella
27 days ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts show a 'License is Invalid' watermark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
28 days ago
I'm not sure, but maybe vRealize Operations prompts the user to apply a VM license key to the VMs running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
29 days ago
I believe the CPU license gets converted to a CPU and VM license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
30 days ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts will be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 months ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts will show a 'License is Invalid' watermark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe vRealize Operations prompts the user to apply a VM license key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 months ago
I believe the CPU license will get converted to a CPU and VM license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is actually E) All of the above. vRealize Operations is so complex, it probably does all of those things!
upvoted 0 times
Jillian
21 hours ago
User 3: Maybe the CPU license gets converted to a CPU and VM license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
2 days ago
User 2: No, I believe vRealize Operations prompts the user to apply a VM license key to the VMs running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
18 days ago
User 1: I think the VMs running on the hosts are not affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
24 days ago
User 3: Yeah, vRealize Operations doesn't mess with the VMs when you apply a CPU License to a custom group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
26 days ago
User 2: Mozelle is correct. The answer is B) The VMs running on the hosts are not affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 months ago
User 1: I think the VMs running on the hosts are not affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruby
1 months ago
I think the VMs running on the hosts will be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 months ago
I'm going with C. vRealize Operations should prompt the user to apply a VM license if the CPU license doesn't cover the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaun
21 days ago
I agree with you. B seems like the most logical option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
28 days ago
I think B is the correct answer. The VMs running on the hosts should not be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donte
2 months ago
D seems like the most logical answer. The VMs would show a license invalid watermark if the CPU license doesn't cover them.
upvoted 0 times
Twila
19 days ago
User 4: It's important to make sure the licenses cover all the VMs to avoid any problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
24 days ago
User 3: So, applying a CPU license to a custom group with existing hosts can cause issues with VM licensing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, if the CPU license doesn't cover the VMs, they will show a 'License is Invalid' watermark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
2 months ago
User 1: I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salina
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The CPU license should just apply to the hosts without affecting the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
Malinda
1 months ago
User3: Agreed. The VMs running on the hosts should continue to run without any impact from the CPU license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 months ago
User2: That makes sense. It wouldn't make sense for the VMs to be affected by just applying a CPU license to the hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 months ago
User1: I think B is the correct answer. The CPU license should just apply to the hosts without affecting the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel