Discuss VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam Topic 4 Question 1

An architect has made an assumption that existing support staff are adequately skilled to operate the proposed infrastructure design.

The risk associated with this assumption would be that existing support staff are inadequately skilled to operate the proposed infrastructure design. How would the architect mitigate the risk?

AHire additional support staff with the same skillsets to add more support capacity.

BAllocate the necessary time and budget to train existing support staff on the necessary skills required to operate.

CComplete a skills assessment of the existing support staff to identify the skill gap.

DEngage a third-party company to deploy and configure the proposed solution.

Suggested Answer: B

The correct mitigation for a skills-based risk is to bridge the gap through training and upskilling. Providing time and budget for training ensures that existing staff can competently support the solution and aligns with long-term sustainability of the environment.

Option A does not address the skills gap, just adds capacity. Option C is a risk identification tool, not a mitigation step. Option D outsources the issue, which contradicts the goal of internal capability development.

VMware Cloud Foundation Architecture and Design Guide -- Risk Identification and Mitigation Strategies

Get Premium 2V0-13.25 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

31 comments · newest first

Daren 7 months ago

Still, we need to know our team's skills first.

Cherrie 7 months ago

True, but they might have more experience.

Roxane 8 months ago

Option D seems risky. Third-party might not understand our needs.

Raylene 8 months ago

Option A could work too, but hiring takes time.

Daren 8 months ago

I agree, but what about option C? Skills assessment first?

Julie 8 months ago

I think engaging a third-party is overkill for this.

Tracey 9 months ago

Hiring more staff could just complicate things.

Monroe 9 months ago

Wait, can we really assume they can learn fast enough?

Brice 9 months ago

Totally agree, training is key!

Amina 9 months ago

Skills assessment is a must!

Casie 9 months ago

Engaging a third-party company sounds tempting, but I wonder if that would really address the underlying skill gaps in the team.

Darrel 9 months ago

I feel like training the current staff, like in option B, could be a better long-term solution, but it might take more time and resources.

Cathrine 10 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think hiring additional staff might not solve the problem if the existing team lacks the necessary skills.

Fernanda 10 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of assessing skills before implementing new systems, so option C seems like a solid choice.

Cherrie 10 months ago

I think option B is the best. Training is key!

Marion 10 months ago

I'd go with B) - training the existing team is the way to go. Upskilling is key!

Roxane 11 months ago

Yes, knowing the gaps helps in training too.

Raylene 11 months ago

Option C gives us a clear picture. Then we can decide.

Miss 11 months ago

Hiring more support staff with the same skills? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline!

Isaiah 11 months ago

D) Engage a third-party company to deploy and configure the proposed solution.

Lizbeth 11 months ago

C) Complete a skills assessment of the existing support staff to identify the skill gap.

Joye 12 months ago

B) Allocate the necessary time and budget to train existing support staff on the necessary skills required to operate.

Johna 12 months ago

I think I'd start with option C - the skills assessment. That will give you a clear picture of where the gaps are, and then you can decide whether to go with option B (training) or option D (third-party support). Gotta make sure you really understand the risk before trying to mitigate it.

Paris 1 year ago

I'm leaning towards option D. If the existing staff really don't have the right skills, it might be better to just bring in a third-party to handle the deployment and configuration. That way you know it'll be done properly.

Golda 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is identifying the risk, which is that the existing staff may not have the right skills to operate the new infrastructure. So I'd go with option C and do a skills assessment first, then use that to inform the training plan in option B.

Goldie 1 year ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I think I'd start by looking at options B and C - assessing the skills of the existing staff and then training them up. That seems like the most logical approach to me.

Quentin 1 year ago

I'm not sure about this one. The question seems a bit tricky, and I'm not confident I fully understand the risk they're asking about.

Mitsue 7 months ago

↳ replying to Quentin

Engaging a third party sounds expensive but could work.

Deja 7 months ago

↳ replying to Quentin

Hiring more staff could just complicate things.

Laine 7 months ago

↳ replying to Quentin

Yeah, but training might be more effective in the long run.

Laquanda 10 months ago

↳ replying to Quentin

I think a skills assessment is a good start.

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion