New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.25 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 4
[All 2V0-13.25 Questions]

An architect has made an assumption that existing support staff are adequately skilled to operate the proposed infrastructure design.

The risk associated with this assumption would be that existing support staff are inadequately skilled to operate the proposed infrastructure design. How would the architect mitigate the risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The correct mitigation for a skills-based risk is to bridge the gap through training and upskilling. Providing time and budget for training ensures that existing staff can competently support the solution and aligns with long-term sustainability of the environment.

Option A does not address the skills gap, just adds capacity. Option C is a risk identification tool, not a mitigation step. Option D outsources the issue, which contradicts the goal of internal capability development.


VMware Cloud Foundation Architecture and Design Guide -- Risk Identification and Mitigation Strategies

by Bernadine at Oct 07, 2025, 09:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-13.25 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Roxane
11 days ago
Option D seems risky. Third-party might not understand our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
16 days ago
Option A could work too, but hiring takes time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
22 days ago
I agree, but what about option C? Skills assessment first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
27 days ago
I think engaging a third-party is overkill for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 month ago
Hiring more staff could just complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
1 month ago
Wait, can we really assume they can learn fast enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
1 month ago
Totally agree, training is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
2 months ago
Skills assessment is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
Engaging a third-party company sounds tempting, but I wonder if that would really address the underlying skill gaps in the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
2 months ago
I feel like training the current staff, like in option B, could be a better long-term solution, but it might take more time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think hiring additional staff might not solve the problem if the existing team lacks the necessary skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of assessing skills before implementing new systems, so option C seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
2 months ago
I think option B is the best. Training is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
3 months ago
I'd go with B) - training the existing team is the way to go. Upskilling is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
3 months ago
Yes, knowing the gaps helps in training too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
3 months ago
Option C gives us a clear picture. Then we can decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
3 months ago
Hiring more support staff with the same skills? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
4 months ago
D) Engage a third-party company to deploy and configure the proposed solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
4 months ago
C) Complete a skills assessment of the existing support staff to identify the skill gap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
4 months ago
B) Allocate the necessary time and budget to train existing support staff on the necessary skills required to operate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
4 months ago
I think I'd start with option C - the skills assessment. That will give you a clear picture of where the gaps are, and then you can decide whether to go with option B (training) or option D (third-party support). Gotta make sure you really understand the risk before trying to mitigate it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. If the existing staff really don't have the right skills, it might be better to just bring in a third-party to handle the deployment and configuration. That way you know it'll be done properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is identifying the risk, which is that the existing staff may not have the right skills to operate the new infrastructure. So I'd go with option C and do a skills assessment first, then use that to inform the training plan in option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I think I'd start by looking at options B and C - assessing the skills of the existing staff and then training them up. That seems like the most logical approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question seems a bit tricky, and I'm not confident I fully understand the risk they're asking about.
upvoted 0 times
Laquanda
3 months ago
I think a skills assessment is a good start.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel