Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

A large financial institution is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) solution. During the initial discovery meetings, the customer detailed the following requirements:* Management of the physical network environment is handled by an outsourced team.* The VMware Administration team cannot re-configure the physical network.* All hosts must use Link Aggregation.* The storage environment is disaggregated.* NFS will be used as principal storage.The customer provided the bill-of-materials for the physical servers being purchased. Each server will have four 25 GbE physical NICs: two connected to the network fabric for Management, vMotion, and virtual machine traffic; and two connected to the storage fabric hosting the NFS server.How does the information provided impact the overall design?
D) Link Aggregation cannot be used in the Management Domain.
A) Link Aggregation cannot be used in the Workload Domain.
B) NIC teaming for Virtual Standard Switch (vSS) must be configured.
C) Multiple Link Aggregation Groups are not supported.

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.25 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All 2V0-13.25 Questions]

A large financial institution is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) solution. During the initial discovery meetings, the customer detailed the following requirements:

* Management of the physical network environment is handled by an outsourced team.

* The VMware Administration team cannot re-configure the physical network.

* All hosts must use Link Aggregation.

* The storage environment is disaggregated.

* NFS will be used as principal storage.

The customer provided the bill-of-materials for the physical servers being purchased. Each server will have four 25 GbE physical NICs: two connected to the network fabric for Management, vMotion, and virtual machine traffic; and two connected to the storage fabric hosting the NFS server.

How does the information provided impact the overall design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

VCF networking guidance emphasizes independent uplinks and notes that while LACP is supported, it is not recommended and introduces additional operational considerations. Specifically: ''Link aggregation to the host is supported but not recommended---the default switch-independent load-based teaming (LBT) provides benefits similar to those of LACP without added configuration complexity.'' It further states: ''Use of LACP... requires specific LACP configuration and switch setup... Not all vSphere features are supported with LACP... [and is] API only.'' The design recommendation is: ''Ensure each connection between the fabric switch and host operates as an independent uplink.''

Given the customer constraint that the VMware Administration team cannot re-configure the physical network, the prerequisite physical switch port-channel configuration for LACP cannot be performed. During bring-up and life-cycle operations, the Management Domain must follow VCF's standardized, automated patterns and therefore cannot rely on fabric changes the team cannot make. As a result, LAG cannot be used in the Management Domain, and the design must adopt independent uplinks (LBT) for management, vMotion, and VM traffic while using NFS as principal storage per the NFS Storage Model.

Reference (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

* VCF 9.0.1 Design -- Network Link Aggregation: support, ''not recommended,'' API-only, and independent uplink recommendation.

* VCF 9.0.1 Design -- Link Aggregation Design Recommendations (independent uplinks).

* VCF 9.0.1 Design -- NFS Storage Model (principal NFS usage context).


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Starr
3 days ago
I agree with Ashton. B makes sense with the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
9 days ago
I feel like B is the way to go. NIC teaming is essential here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
14 days ago
This is tricky. I think A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
19 days ago
Not sure if this design will hold up under heavy loads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
24 days ago
Disaggregated storage means more flexibility, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
29 days ago
Wait, can you really not use Link Aggregation in the Management Domain?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
1 month ago
I think NIC teaming is definitely needed here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 month ago
Sounds like Link Aggregation is a must for the hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
1 month ago
I feel like the outsourced management team complicates things. If they can't reconfigure the physical network, does that mean we can't use Link Aggregation at all in the Workload Domain?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
2 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the Link Aggregation Groups. I thought they were generally supported, but this question makes me wonder if there are exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
2 months ago
I think I saw a similar question about NIC teaming in our practice exams. It seems like we might need to configure that for the vSS, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
2 months ago
I remember something about Link Aggregation being tricky in certain domains, but I'm not sure if it applies to the Management Domain here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel