Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 2V0-13.24 Topic 5 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.24 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 5
[All 2V0-13.24 Questions]

An architect is designing a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based Private Cloud solution. During the requirements gathering workshop, a stakeholder from the network team stated that:

The solution must ensure that any physical networking component is redundant to N+N.

The solution must ensure inter-datacenter network links are diversely routed.

When writing the design documentation, how should the architect classify the stated requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, design qualities (non-functional requirements) categorize how the system operates. The network team's requirements focus on redundancy and routing diversity, which the architect must classify. Let's evaluate:

Option A: Availability

This is correct. Availability ensures the solution remains operational and accessible. ''N+N redundancy'' (e.g., dual active components where N failures are tolerated by N spares) for physical networking components eliminates single points of failure, ensuring continuous network uptime. ''Diversely routed inter-datacenter links'' prevents outages from a single path failure, enhancing availability across sites. In VCF, these align with high-availability network design (e.g., NSX Edge uplink redundancy), making availability the proper classification.

Option B: Performance

Performance addresses speed, throughput, or latency (e.g., ''10 Gbps links''). Redundancy and diverse routing might indirectly support performance by avoiding bottlenecks, but the primary intent is uptime, not speed. This doesn't fit the stated requirements' focus.

Option C: Recoverability

Recoverability focuses on restoring service after a failure (e.g., backups, failover time). N+N redundancy and diverse routing prevent downtime rather than recover from it. While related, the requirements emphasize proactive uptime (availability) over post-failure recovery, making this incorrect.

Option D: Manageability

Manageability concerns ease of administration (e.g., monitoring, configuration). Redundancy and routing diversity are infrastructure design choices, not management processes. This quality doesn't apply.

Conclusion:

The architect should classify the requirement as Availability (A). It ensures the VCF solution's network remains operational, aligning with VCF 5.2's focus on resilient design.


VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Design Qualities)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Network Availability)

Contribute your Thoughts:

Daniela
14 days ago
I'd classify this as an Availability requirement. Redundancy and diverse routing are all about ensuring the network stays up and running no matter what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
18 days ago
Haha, the network team must be really paranoid about their infrastructure going down. Gotta love that N+N redundancy, it's like they're preparing for a zombie apocalypse!
upvoted 0 times
Arlen
5 days ago
A: Definitely, N+N redundancy is no joke. It's better to be safe than sorry!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sueann
28 days ago
Hmm, the inter-datacenter link diversity is also a key consideration for Recoverability in case of a network failure. I'd say this is a mix of Availability and Recoverability.
upvoted 0 times
Barney
13 days ago
A: So, it's a mix of Availability and Recoverability then. The architect should classify it as such in the design documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
14 days ago
B: I agree, but it also contributes to Recoverability by diversely routing inter-datacenter network links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
24 days ago
A: I think the requirement falls under Availability because it ensures redundancy for physical networking components.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
28 days ago
I see your point, Tegan. It could be a combination of both Availability and Performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 months ago
But wouldn't diversely routed inter-datacenter network links also contribute to Performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
1 months ago
The redundancy requirement clearly points to Availability as the main concern. This seems like a straightforward Availability requirement to me.
upvoted 0 times
Val
5 days ago
A) Availability
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
6 days ago
No, I think it's more about ensuring the network stays up and running, so it's definitely Availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
7 days ago
C) Recoverability
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
8 days ago
I agree, the N+N redundancy requirement definitely falls under Availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
24 days ago
A) Availability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clorinda
1 months ago
I agree with Twanna, having redundant networking components is crucial for availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
1 months ago
I think the requirement should be classified as Availability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel