MENU
A customer has a physical windows server running Microsoft SQL 2020.
Which component should be used to protect the whole server?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium VMCE_v12 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
It is recommended to install Veeam ONE before Veeam Backup & Replication because Veeam ONE can potentially identify infrastructure issues that might affect backup operations before they are performed. This proactive approach ensures that the environment is optimized for successful backup and replication tasks. Reference: Veeam Installation and Configuration Guide, Veeam ONE Deployment Best Practices
42 comments · newest first
FA
Fannie
11 months ago
Cache Repository is not for server protection, just saying!
NO
Norah
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure Veeam Agent is enough for SQL 2020?
VO
Vonda
11 months ago
Definitely Veeam Agent! It covers everything.
CH
Chandra
11 months ago
I think the Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application might be better for SQL specifically.
LA
Laurel
12 months ago
Veeam Agent is the way to go for full server protection!
BR
Broderick
12 months ago
Cache Repository doesn’t seem like it fits here at all; I don’t recall it being used for server protection in our studies.
MA
Mabel
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards Veeam Backup Proxy, but I feel like it’s more about managing backups rather than protecting the server itself.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where Veeam Plug-in was mentioned, but that was more for applications, not the whole server.
CA
Carlee
1 year ago
I think Veeam Agent might be the right choice since it’s designed for protecting physical servers, but I'm not entirely sure.
BO
Bobbie
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application, Veeam Backup Proxy, and Cache Repository don't seem like they'd protect the entire server. I'll need to double-check the Veeam product descriptions to make sure I understand the differences.
RE
Regenia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Veeam has different products, but I'm not sure which one would be the best to protect the entire server. I'll need to review the options carefully.
MI
Mirta
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about protecting a physical Windows server running SQL 2020. I'll need to think about the different Veeam components and their purposes to determine the best option.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The server is physical, so I'm thinking the Veeam Agent would be the way to go. It's designed to protect physical machines, right? I'll mark that as my answer for now.
GL
Glynda
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. Using a switch condition to execute the two Update Row actions in parallel should minimize the processing time, as they are not dependent on each other.
PR
Precious
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Do we really need to check for unaccounted transactions? Wouldn't ensuring the invoices are paid and the journals are posted be enough?
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure how to approach it without more information about the G560 and its GPU capabilities.
RO
Ronnie
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A. The main objective is increasing form completions, not hitting an exact percentage. Being flexible seems more scientific.
JU
Jutta
1 year ago
Veeam Agent all the way! It's like the Swiss Army Knife of server protection - does the whole shebang. Just don't forget to bring your duct tape and baling wire, just in case.
RO
Rory
1 year ago
Cache Repository? That sounds more like a storage solution, not a protection method. I think I'll skip that one and look at the other options more closely.
AN
Andra
1 year ago
The Veeam Backup Proxy looks promising, but I'm not sure if it can handle the full server backup. Gotta make sure it's not just for SQL databases.
NI
Nina
1 year ago
A: So, Veeam Backup Proxy would be the best choice for protecting the physical Windows server running Microsoft SQL 2020.
MA
Marquetta
1 year ago
B: Yeah, I agree. It's designed to protect the whole server, including SQL databases.
RE
Reiko
1 year ago
A: I think Veeam Backup Proxy can handle full server backups, not just SQL databases.
DO
Dorthy
1 year ago
The Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application is designed specifically for SQL, but it won't protect the rest of the server. This is a whole server protection question, so that's not the right answer.
LA
Laquanda
1 year ago
C: Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application is more focused on SQL, so it might not be the best choice for whole server protection.
BE
Beatriz
1 year ago
D) Cache Repository
NO
Noel
1 year ago
B: I agree, Veeam Agent is designed for full server protection.
LE
Leslee
1 year ago
C) Veeam Backup Proxy
IL
Ilene
1 year ago
A: I think the best option would be Veeam Agent to protect the whole server.
BR
Brett
1 year ago
A) Veeam Agent
WI
Willodean
1 year ago
Hmm, Veeam Agent seems like the logical choice here to protect the entire server, not just the SQL database. I wonder if it can handle the server's other workloads too.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
I would go with Veeam Agent to ensure the whole server is protected.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
D) Cache Repository
PR
Precious
1 year ago
Veeam Agent is designed to protect the entire server, so it should work well.
GR
Graham
1 year ago
C) Veeam Backup Proxy
FL
Flo
1 year ago
I agree, Veeam Agent should be able to handle all the server's workloads.
AI
Aide
1 year ago
B) Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application
VE
Verda
1 year ago
I think Veeam Agent is the best choice for protecting the whole server.
NU
Nu
1 year ago
A) Veeam Agent
TH
Thea
2 years ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I see your rationale. I might reconsider my answer.
CH
Chan
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Veeam Backup Proxy because it can efficiently protect the server.
TH
Thea
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Veeam Agent because it can protect the whole server.