VEEAM VMCE_v12 Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for VEEAM's VMCE_v12 exam

Question #: 8
Topic #: 1

[All VMCE_v12 Questions]

A customer has a physical windows server running Microsoft SQL 2020.

Which component should be used to protect the whole server?

AVeeam Agent

BVeeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application

CVeeam Backup Proxy

DCache Repository

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

It is recommended to install Veeam ONE before Veeam Backup & Replication because Veeam ONE can potentially identify infrastructure issues that might affect backup operations before they are performed. This proactive approach ensures that the environment is optimized for successful backup and replication tasks. Reference: Veeam Installation and Configuration Guide, Veeam ONE Deployment Best Practices

by Arminda at Mar 09, 2024, 12:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium VMCE_v12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Fannie

6 months ago

Cache Repository is not for server protection, just saying!

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

6 months ago

Wait, are we sure Veeam Agent is enough for SQL 2020?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vonda

7 months ago

Definitely Veeam Agent! It covers everything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

7 months ago

I think the Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application might be better for SQL specifically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

7 months ago

Veeam Agent is the way to go for full server protection!

upvoted 0 times

...

Broderick

7 months ago

Cache Repository doesn’t seem like it fits here at all; I don’t recall it being used for server protection in our studies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mabel

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards Veeam Backup Proxy, but I feel like it’s more about managing backups rather than protecting the server itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

8 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where Veeam Plug-in was mentioned, but that was more for applications, not the whole server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlee

8 months ago

I think Veeam Agent might be the right choice since it’s designed for protecting physical servers, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbie

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the options here. Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application, Veeam Backup Proxy, and Cache Repository don't seem like they'd protect the entire server. I'll need to double-check the Veeam product descriptions to make sure I understand the differences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Veeam has different products, but I'm not sure which one would be the best to protect the entire server. I'll need to review the options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

8 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about protecting a physical Windows server running SQL 2020. I'll need to think about the different Veeam components and their purposes to determine the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

8 months ago

Okay, let's see. The server is physical, so I'm thinking the Veeam Agent would be the way to go. It's designed to protect physical machines, right? I'll mark that as my answer for now.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glynda

8 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. Using a switch condition to execute the two Update Row actions in parallel should minimize the processing time, as they are not dependent on each other.

upvoted 0 times

...

Precious

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. Do we really need to check for unaccounted transactions? Wouldn't ensuring the invoices are paid and the journals are posted be enough?

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure how to approach it without more information about the G560 and its GPU capabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

8 months ago

I'm leaning towards A. The main objective is increasing form completions, not hitting an exact percentage. Being flexible seems more scientific.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

1 year ago

Veeam Agent all the way! It's like the Swiss Army Knife of server protection - does the whole shebang. Just don't forget to bring your duct tape and baling wire, just in case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

1 year ago

Cache Repository? That sounds more like a storage solution, not a protection method. I think I'll skip that one and look at the other options more closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

1 year ago

The Veeam Backup Proxy looks promising, but I'm not sure if it can handle the full server backup. Gotta make sure it's not just for SQL databases.

upvoted 0 times

Nina

11 months ago

A: So, Veeam Backup Proxy would be the best choice for protecting the physical Windows server running Microsoft SQL 2020.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marquetta

12 months ago

B: Yeah, I agree. It's designed to protect the whole server, including SQL databases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reiko

1 year ago

A: I think Veeam Backup Proxy can handle full server backups, not just SQL databases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

1 year ago

The Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application is designed specifically for SQL, but it won't protect the rest of the server. This is a whole server protection question, so that's not the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

Laquanda

12 months ago

C: Veeam Plug-in for Enterprise Application is more focused on SQL, so it might not be the best choice for whole server protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beatriz

12 months ago

D) Cache Repository

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

1 year ago

B: I agree, Veeam Agent is designed for full server protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslee

1 year ago

C) Veeam Backup Proxy

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

1 year ago

A: I think the best option would be Veeam Agent to protect the whole server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brett

1 year ago

A) Veeam Agent

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

1 year ago

Hmm, Veeam Agent seems like the logical choice here to protect the entire server, not just the SQL database. I wonder if it can handle the server's other workloads too.

upvoted 0 times