MENU
To ensure SLA compliance and protection against ransomware, which of the following configurations would accomplish this goal?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium VMCA2022 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
* Use Hardened Repositories as the primary target, which are Linux-based repositories that support immutability and prevent ransomware from accessing or deleting backup files12.
* Use backup copy jobs to create a second copy of the backups to a different site, which will provide additional protection and redundancy in case of a disaster or data loss34.
* Use Veeam Backup & Replication servers at one location, which will simplify the management and monitoring of the backup infrastructure and reduce the operational costs.
The other configurations are not as effective or secure, as they either do not use immutability, do not create a second copy of the backups, or do not leverage the benefits of Veeam Backup & Replication servers.
37 comments · newest first
MO
Mona
11 months ago
Wait, can we really trust these setups against ransomware?
TA
Tarra
11 months ago
D seems risky with just one location.
AH
Ahmed
11 months ago
C is interesting, but not sure it’s the safest.
MU
Murray
11 months ago
I think B is the best choice for immutability!
BR
Brigette
12 months ago
Option A sounds solid for redundancy.
MA
Margot
12 months ago
Option D mentions Hardened Repositories, and I think we covered that in class as a good strategy, but I'm torn between that and option A.
HO
Hollis
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where object storage was mentioned, but I can't recall if it was the best option for SLA compliance.
IS
Isadora
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think immutability is crucial for ransomware protection, which makes option B sound appealing.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of having multiple locations for backups, so option A seems like a solid choice.
NU
Nu
1 year ago
Based on the requirements, I think option A or C would be the best choices. Implementing Veeam at two locations with offsite backup copies seems like the most robust solution.
JO
Josphine
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the options. Can someone clarify the differences between ReFS, XFS, and Hardened Repositories? I want to make sure I understand the pros and cons of each.
SA
Sarina
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. We need to ensure SLA compliance and protection against ransomware, so the key things to focus on are redundancy, immutability, and offsite storage.
LO
Lottie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the options here. I'll need to review my Veeam knowledge to make sure I pick the right configuration.
MA
Makeda
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Veeam backup and replication question. I'm confident I can work through this.
DA
Dahlia
2 years ago
Wait, what's a 'Veeam'? Is that like a new superhero or something? I'm gonna go with Option C just because it sounds the coolest.
FL
Flo
2 years ago
I'm glad we're all on the same page. Option A it is for ensuring SLA compliance and protection against ransomware.
BI
Billye
2 years ago
Yeah, having a backup copy to a second site is important for data protection. Option A is definitely the way to go.
EA
Earlean
2 years ago
I agree, Option A with Veeam Backup & Replication servers at two locations and ReFS repository as a primary target seems like a solid plan.
BE
Bernardo
2 years ago
Option C sounds cool, but I think Option A is the best choice for SLA compliance and protection against ransomware.
TR
Trina
2 years ago
Option B gets my vote. XFS with immutability on NFS targets? It's like they're speaking my language. I'm sold!
IS
Isabelle
2 years ago
Cecilia: Option A could work too, but I still think option B is the best choice for us.
JE
Jestine
2 years ago
User 3: I'm not sure, I think option A might be a better choice with backup copy to a second site.
CE
Cecilia
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, that configuration seems like it would provide good protection against ransomware.
LO
Louvenia
2 years ago
User 1: Option B sounds great. XFS with immutability on NFS targets is the way to go.
RE
Rebecka
2 years ago
Hmm, Option D looks good to me. Hardened Repositories? That's some next-level security right there. I bet the ransomware won't stand a chance.
TO
Tomas
2 years ago
I'd go with Option C. Leveraging object storage is the way to go these days. Plus, it's just fun to say 'object storage'.
PE
Pearly
2 years ago
Yeah, it's definitely a modern solution to consider for data protection.
MA
Maryrose
2 years ago
I agree, object storage seems like a reliable option for ensuring SLA compliance and protection against ransomware.
AL
Alease
2 years ago
Option C sounds like a solid choice. Object storage is definitely becoming more popular.
EL
Eladia
2 years ago
But option A provides redundancy with two locations, which is important for SLA compliance.
ED
Edda
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more secure.
OL
Oliva
2 years ago
Option A seems like a solid choice, with the ReFS repository and the backup copy to a second site. Gotta love that redundancy!
AM
Amie
2 years ago
Iesha: True, having a backup copy at a second site is crucial for SLA compliance.
VA
Valentine
2 years ago
User 3: Option D could also work with the hardened repositories for extra security.
IE
Iesha
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, having backups in two locations is important for protection.
CA
Carlee
2 years ago
User 1: Option A does seem like a good choice, the redundancy is key.
EL
Eladia
2 years ago
I think option A would be the best choice.