The gross floor area requirement is interesting, but I'm not sure if that's the key factor in defining the project boundary. I'll keep that in mind as I consider the other options.
Option D is the way to go. I mean, you can't just ignore the surrounding land that's impacted by your construction, can you? That would be like trying to build a house and pretending the yard doesn't exist.
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an architect who loves drawing project boundaries. D is clearly the right answer, but I'm tempted to say A just to mess with them.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think C makes the most sense - the project should have a minimum size of 1,000 sq ft. Anything smaller doesn't seem like a real LEED project to me.
Definitely D. The project boundary should include any land that is altered due to construction, regardless of the building size or number of buildings.
Nguyet
3 months agoTeri
3 months agoMilly
4 months agoMelissia
4 months agoRuthann
4 months agoCelestina
4 months agoAnnice
4 months agoFelicia
5 months agoKattie
5 months agoBarbra
5 months agoKimberlie
5 months agoCeola
5 months agoOrville
5 months agoKent
5 months agoMarcos
1 year agoLigia
1 year agoIzetta
11 months agoChara
11 months agoOliva
12 months agoArmando
1 year agoBilly
1 year agoBrigette
1 year agoOcie
1 year agoSlyvia
1 year agoMinna
1 year agoRoyal
1 year agoBrunilda
1 year agoSunny
1 year agoFairy
1 year agoLashaunda
1 year agoLou
1 year agoLemuel
1 year agoFiliberto
1 year agoBenton
1 year agoMinna
1 year ago