Option D is the way to go. I mean, you can't just ignore the surrounding land that's impacted by your construction, can you? That would be like trying to build a house and pretending the yard doesn't exist.
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an architect who loves drawing project boundaries. D is clearly the right answer, but I'm tempted to say A just to mess with them.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think C makes the most sense - the project should have a minimum size of 1,000 sq ft. Anything smaller doesn't seem like a real LEED project to me.
Definitely D. The project boundary should include any land that is altered due to construction, regardless of the building size or number of buildings.
Marcos
4 months agoLigia
4 months agoIzetta
2 months agoChara
2 months agoOliva
3 months agoArmando
3 months agoBilly
4 months agoBrigette
4 months agoOcie
4 months agoSlyvia
4 months agoMinna
5 months agoRoyal
5 months agoBrunilda
4 months agoSunny
4 months agoFairy
4 months agoLashaunda
4 months agoLou
4 months agoLemuel
4 months agoFiliberto
5 months agoBenton
5 months agoMinna
5 months ago