Option D is the way to go. I mean, you can't just ignore the surrounding land that's impacted by your construction, can you? That would be like trying to build a house and pretending the yard doesn't exist.
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an architect who loves drawing project boundaries. D is clearly the right answer, but I'm tempted to say A just to mess with them.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think C makes the most sense - the project should have a minimum size of 1,000 sq ft. Anything smaller doesn't seem like a real LEED project to me.
Definitely D. The project boundary should include any land that is altered due to construction, regardless of the building size or number of buildings.
Marcos
6 months agoLigia
6 months agoIzetta
5 months agoChara
5 months agoOliva
5 months agoArmando
6 months agoBilly
6 months agoBrigette
6 months agoOcie
6 months agoSlyvia
6 months agoMinna
7 months agoRoyal
7 months agoBrunilda
6 months agoSunny
6 months agoFairy
7 months agoLashaunda
7 months agoLou
7 months agoLemuel
7 months agoFiliberto
7 months agoBenton
7 months agoMinna
7 months ago