Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

US Green Building Council LEED-AP-ID+C Exam - Topic 3 Question 30 Discussion

A Client is fitting out a building with area 20,500 ft2 (1 904.5 m2) and wishes to pursue the Energy and Atmosphere Credit, Enhanced Commissioning. Who may be appointed as the Commissioning Authority (CxA) for the project?
B) A sub-consultant to the architecture or engineering firm but not a member of the design team
A) An employee of the architecture or engineering firm but not a member of the design team
C) A subcontractor of the general contractor or construction manager but not a member of the construction team
D) An employee or subcontractor of the general contractor or construction manager and a member of the construction team

US Green Building Council LEED-AP-ID+C Exam - Topic 3 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for US Green Building Council's LEED-AP-ID+C exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 3
[All LEED-AP-ID+C Questions]

A Client is fitting out a building with area 20,500 ft2 (1 904.5 m2) and wishes to pursue the Energy and Atmosphere Credit, Enhanced Commissioning. Who may be appointed as the Commissioning Authority (CxA) for the project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

For the Energy and Atmosphere Credit, Enhanced Commissioning, the Commissioning Authority (CxA) plays a crucial role in overseeing the commissioning process. The CxA must be independent of the project's design and construction team to maintain objectivity. An employee of the architecture or engineering firm involved in the project could potentially have a conflict of interest. Similarly, a member of the construction team could also have biases that might affect the commissioning process's integrity. Therefore, a sub-consultant to the architecture or engineering firm, who is not part of the project's design team, is an appropriate choice for the CxA role, ensuring independence and impartiality in the commissioning process. Reference:

LEED v4 for Interior Design and Construction Reference Guide, particularly the section on Energy and Atmosphere Credit, Enhanced Commissioning


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cordell
12 hours ago
I prefer option B. A sub-consultant can provide fresh insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
6 days ago
I think option A is the best choice. Keeps it unbiased.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
11 days ago
A sub-consultant makes the most sense for this role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
16 days ago
Wait, can a general contractor's employee really be the CxA? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
21 days ago
I disagree, I believe a subcontractor can be the CxA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
26 days ago
Definitely not an employee from the design team!
upvoted 0 times
...
James
1 month ago
I think it has to be a sub-consultant, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
1 month ago
I think it’s definitely not D, since they would be too involved in the construction process. A or B seems more likely based on what I studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about the role of subcontractors. Can a subcontractor from the general contractor be the CxA? I feel like that might be a conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
2 months ago
I remember a practice question where it said the CxA shouldn't be part of the design team, so I feel like A or B could be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 months ago
I think the CxA has to be independent, so options A and B might be okay, but I’m not sure about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel