UiPath-ARDv1 Exam - Topic 5 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-ARDv1 exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 5

A developer has created a process that gathers a listing of stock market prices in the following format _USD ().

How should the third line in RegEx Builder be modified to ensure that only items with prices of at least 100 are identified?

ARegEx: One of
Value: 123456789
Quantifiers: Between 2 and 4

BRegEx: Any word character
Value: \w
Quantifiers: Exactly 3

CRegEx: Digit
Value: \d
Quantifiers: Exactly 3
(Correct)
D.
RegEx: Literal
Value: [0-9]
Quantifiers: At least one (1 or more)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Retry Scope condition can be one of the activities that return a boolean. Even though the Path Exists activity also returns a Boolean value, it cannot be used in Retry Scope, it is an exception.

Instead of using Path Exists activity, you can use a Check True activity and as a condition placeSystem.IO.File.Exists(filepath).

UiPath Documentation

UiPath Forum

Exam Topic:Identify and describe the use of the error handling activities such as Try Catch, Throw, Rethrow, Retry Scope, and Global Exception Handler.

by Veronika at Jan 08, 2023, 01:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium UiPath-ARDv1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Paulina

4 months ago

I’m not sure about C, seems too simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reuben

4 months ago

Definitely not A or B, those don't fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

4 months ago

Wait, can regex really handle that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

4 months ago

I think option C is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

4 months ago

Prices need to be 100 or more!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the quantifiers; I thought we needed to allow for more than three digits to cover higher prices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ardella

5 months ago

I feel like option C makes sense since it specifies exactly three digits, which could cover prices starting from 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rickie

5 months ago

I think we need to ensure that the regex captures at least three digits for prices, but I can't recall the exact quantifier we discussed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salina

5 months ago

I remember we practiced something similar, but I’m not sure if “\d” is enough to capture prices over 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

5 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward BGP configuration question. I'll start by carefully reviewing the network diagrams and configuration details provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karma

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. Full access but no organization specified... I'm guessing that means the user gets full rights across the board.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

5 months ago

Ah, this is a classic garbage collection question. I've seen these before, so I'm feeling pretty confident about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

10 months ago

Are you kidding me? The price can't be a literal 123456789, that's way too high! I guess the RegEx needs to be a bit more specific to match the minimum price requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Judy

8 months ago

D: Let's go with option C then, it should help us filter out those extremely high prices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rikki

8 months ago

C: Agreed, option C seems to be the best choice to ensure we only capture prices that meet the minimum requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

8 months ago

B: I think option C looks like the correct one. It specifies exactly 3 digits, which should work for prices over 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ira

8 months ago

A: Yeah, that price is definitely too high. We need to adjust the RegEx to only identify prices of at least 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

8 months ago

D: Let's go with option C then. It's important to have the correct RegEx to accurately gather the stock market prices we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

9 months ago

C: Yeah, option C seems to be the best choice to ensure we're only capturing prices that meet the minimum requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

9 months ago

B: I think option C is the correct one. It specifies a digit with exactly 3 quantifiers, which should work for prices of at least 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

10 months ago

A: You're right, the price of 123456789 is way too high. We need to adjust the RegEx to only identify prices of at least 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

10 months ago

Hmm, I think I got this. We need to use a digit pattern to match the price, and the quantifier should be 'at least one' to ensure it's at least 100. Feels like a trick question, but I'm ready for it!

upvoted 0 times

...