New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Trend TM1-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Trend's TM1-101 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 2
[All TM1-101 Questions]

How does Server Protect for operating systems (Windows, NetWare, Linux) differ from Server Protect for file-server appliances (EMC Celerra File Servers and Network Appliance filers)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Beula at May 11, 2024, 01:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM1-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Thad
3 months ago
D is misleading, the appliance does it all first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
3 months ago
Wait, really? I thought all scanning was done by the server!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
3 months ago
C seems off, I think compressed files can be scanned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
4 months ago
I disagree with B, the appliance does the scanning itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
4 months ago
A is correct! The agents on the appliance handle the scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
4 months ago
I vaguely recall something about the scanning process being sequential with appliances, but I can't remember the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about how scanning works with compressed files. I’m not sure if that applies here though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
4 months ago
I’m a bit unsure, but I feel like the virus scanning for appliances might rely on other servers instead of doing it all on the appliance itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
5 months ago
I think I remember that with Server Protect for file-server appliances, the scanning is handled differently than with the regular server versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
5 months ago
The question is asking about the differences, so I need to pay close attention to the wording of each option. It seems like option A might be the right answer, since it specifically mentions that agents installed on the appliance do the virus scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key distinction is that with file-server appliances, the virus scanning is done by the appliance itself, whereas for regular operating systems, the scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question comparing the virus scanning capabilities of Server Protect for different platforms. I'll need to carefully read through the options to understand the key differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the two Server Protect implementations. I'll need to think through the details of how each one works to determine the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Do we need to create a new data extension or can we use an existing one? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
5 months ago
I think providing solution optimization services could be one of the examples, but I'm not entirely sure about the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
10 months ago
Ah, the joys of file-server appliance security. It's like trying to keep a virus out of a locked box by putting it in another locked box. Option B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
10 months ago
Haha, can you imagine the appliance itself trying to do the virus scanning? It would probably just end up scanning itself and getting a virus! Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Beula
8 months ago
User 3: Yeah, it's definitely more efficient to have dedicated servers handle the scanning instead of overloading the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
8 months ago
User 2: I agree, having other servers do the virus scanning for file-server appliances makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
9 months ago
User 1: Haha, can you imagine the appliance itself trying to do the virus scanning? It would probably just end up scanning itself and getting a virus! Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thora
10 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I thought the agents installed on the appliance would do the virus scanning, but I guess that's not the case.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
9 months ago
C) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, the virus scanning cannot be done on compressed files or archives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
9 months ago
B) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, the virus scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
9 months ago
A) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, agents installed on the appliance do the virus scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margery
10 months ago
Option B seems to be the correct answer. The virus scanning for file-server appliances is done by other servers, not the appliance itself.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
8 months ago
Yes, understanding the differences can help in choosing the right protection for our servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
9 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to know how Server Protect differs for different operating systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
9 months ago
I think option B is correct. The virus scanning is done by other servers for file-server appliances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
10 months ago
Well, I read that the virus scanning for file-server appliances cannot be done on compressed files or archives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the virus scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
11 months ago
I think Server Protect for file-server appliances uses agents on the appliance for virus scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel