Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Trend TM1-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Posted by Beula on May 11, 2024 at 01:22 PM

How does Server Protect for operating systems (Windows, NetWare, Linux) differ from Server Protect for file-server appliances (EMC Celerra File Servers and Network Appliance filers)?

Suggested Answer: B, C

Get Premium TM1-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
TH
Thad 10 months ago
D is misleading, the appliance does it all first.
PA
Page 11 months ago
Wait, really? I thought all scanning was done by the server!
BE
Bernardine 11 months ago
C seems off, I think compressed files can be scanned.
VI
Vincenza 11 months ago
I disagree with B, the appliance does the scanning itself.
NA
Nana 11 months ago
A is correct! The agents on the appliance handle the scanning.
EL
Elly 12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about the scanning process being sequential with appliances, but I can't remember the exact details.
RO
Royal 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about how scanning works with compressed files. I’m not sure if that applies here though.
BL
Blythe 12 months ago
I’m a bit unsure, but I feel like the virus scanning for appliances might rely on other servers instead of doing it all on the appliance itself.
DA
Danilo 1 year ago
I think I remember that with Server Protect for file-server appliances, the scanning is handled differently than with the regular server versions.
MY
My 1 year ago
The question is asking about the differences, so I need to pay close attention to the wording of each option. It seems like option A might be the right answer, since it specifically mentions that agents installed on the appliance do the virus scanning.
CA
Candida 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key distinction is that with file-server appliances, the virus scanning is done by the appliance itself, whereas for regular operating systems, the scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance. I'll go with option B.
CI
Ciara 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question comparing the virus scanning capabilities of Server Protect for different platforms. I'll need to carefully read through the options to understand the key differences.
WA
Wava 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the two Server Protect implementations. I'll need to think through the details of how each one works to determine the right answer.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Do we need to create a new data extension or can we use an existing one? I'll have to think this through carefully.
MA
Maddie 1 year ago
I think providing solution optimization services could be one of the examples, but I'm not entirely sure about the second one.
VI
Vicente 1 year ago
Ah, the joys of file-server appliance security. It's like trying to keep a virus out of a locked box by putting it in another locked box. Option B is the clear winner here.
CO
Colene 1 year ago
Haha, can you imagine the appliance itself trying to do the virus scanning? It would probably just end up scanning itself and getting a virus! Option B is the way to go.
BE
Beula 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colene
User 3: Yeah, it's definitely more efficient to have dedicated servers handle the scanning instead of overloading the appliance.
MA
Maia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colene
User 2: I agree, having other servers do the virus scanning for file-server appliances makes more sense.
NA
Nadine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colene
User 1: Haha, can you imagine the appliance itself trying to do the virus scanning? It would probably just end up scanning itself and getting a virus! Option B is the way to go.
TH
Thora 1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. I thought the agents installed on the appliance would do the virus scanning, but I guess that's not the case.
SK
Skye 1 year ago
↳ replying to Thora
C) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, the virus scanning cannot be done on compressed files or archives.
GL
Glenn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Thora
B) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, the virus scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance.
CH
Chana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Thora
A) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, agents installed on the appliance do the virus scanning.
MA
Margery 1 year ago
Option B seems to be the correct answer. The virus scanning for file-server appliances is done by other servers, not the appliance itself.
RE
Reita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
Yes, understanding the differences can help in choosing the right protection for our servers.
SH
Sherman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
That makes sense. It's important to know how Server Protect differs for different operating systems.
CR
Crista 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
I think option B is correct. The virus scanning is done by other servers for file-server appliances.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
Well, I read that the virus scanning for file-server appliances cannot be done on compressed files or archives.
RE
Rebbeca 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the virus scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance.
KA
Kattie 2 years ago
I think Server Protect for file-server appliances uses agents on the appliance for virus scanning.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel