Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Trend Exam TM1-101 Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Trend's TM1-101 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 2
[All TM1-101 Questions]

How does Server Protect for operating systems (Windows, NetWare, Linux) differ from Server Protect for file-server appliances (EMC Celerra File Servers and Network Appliance filers)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Beula at May 11, 2024, 02:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM1-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Wava
4 days ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the two Server Protect implementations. I'll need to think through the details of how each one works to determine the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
10 days ago
I think providing solution optimization services could be one of the examples, but I'm not entirely sure about the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
10 days ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Do we need to create a new data extension or can we use an existing one? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
5 months ago
Ah, the joys of file-server appliance security. It's like trying to keep a virus out of a locked box by putting it in another locked box. Option B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
5 months ago
Haha, can you imagine the appliance itself trying to do the virus scanning? It would probably just end up scanning itself and getting a virus! Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Beula
3 months ago
User 3: Yeah, it's definitely more efficient to have dedicated servers handle the scanning instead of overloading the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
4 months ago
User 2: I agree, having other servers do the virus scanning for file-server appliances makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
4 months ago
User 1: Haha, can you imagine the appliance itself trying to do the virus scanning? It would probably just end up scanning itself and getting a virus! Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thora
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I thought the agents installed on the appliance would do the virus scanning, but I guess that's not the case.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
4 months ago
C) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, the virus scanning cannot be done on compressed files or archives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
4 months ago
B) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, the virus scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
5 months ago
A) With Server Protect for file-server appliances, agents installed on the appliance do the virus scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margery
5 months ago
Option B seems to be the correct answer. The virus scanning for file-server appliances is done by other servers, not the appliance itself.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
4 months ago
Yes, understanding the differences can help in choosing the right protection for our servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
4 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to know how Server Protect differs for different operating systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
4 months ago
I think option B is correct. The virus scanning is done by other servers for file-server appliances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
6 months ago
Well, I read that the virus scanning for file-server appliances cannot be done on compressed files or archives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe the virus scanning is done by other servers, not the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
6 months ago
I think Server Protect for file-server appliances uses agents on the appliance for virus scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel