Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Trend Deep-Security-Professional Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Trend's Deep-Security-Professional exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All Deep-Security-Professional Questions]

The details of a policy are displayed in the exhibit. Based on these details, which of the following statements is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Meaghan at Jul 07, 2023, 09:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Deep-Security-Professional Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Wilda
5 months ago
D is interesting, replicating streams for analysis is smart!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
5 months ago
Wait, C says events will be ignored? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
6 months ago
B seems off, packets failing checks shouldn't pass, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
6 months ago
Totally agree, caching is super efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
6 months ago
A says the credibility scores are cached for 30 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
6 months ago
I vaguely recall something about live packet streams in option D. It might be true that they get replicated for analysis, but I can't remember the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
6 months ago
Option C seems off to me. I thought events from the corporate network were always logged, not ignored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
7 months ago
I remember a practice question about packet checks, and I feel like option B is misleading. Packets usually get dropped if they fail those checks, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
7 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if the caching period is really 30 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. The AppExchange has a lot of different things, right? I think A and C sound right, but I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
7 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The XML Schema in option A looks like it should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
7 months ago
I believe the correct answer involves setting local preference for routes from AS 65517, but I'm a bit confused if it should be for passed through routes or directly attached ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
7 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice question we did about warehouse space allocation. I feel like 15 million could be a reasonable guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
11 months ago
I bet the person who wrote option C was just having a 'ignore everything' kind of day. Not the best policy, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
Hmm, let's see. Caching, sanity checks, ignoring events... Sounds like a fun time at the ol' network security office, eh?
upvoted 0 times
Orville
10 months ago
D) Live packet streams coming through the network engine will be replicated and all traffic analysis will be performed on the replicated stream
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
10 months ago
C) Any events generated by computers within your corporate network, as defined by an IP address range, will be ignored
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
10 months ago
B) Packets failing the Network Packet Sanity Check will still be allowed to pass through the network engine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
10 months ago
A) The credibility scores for visited web sites will be cached. If access to the web site is re-quested again within 30 minutes, its credibility score will be retrieved from the cache instead of the configured Smart Protection source.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
12 months ago
C can't be right. Ignoring events from your own corporate network? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
12 months ago
I'm going with D. Replicating the live packet stream for analysis sounds like a good way to monitor network traffic without impacting performance.
upvoted 0 times
Gracie
10 months ago
D does sound like a good option for monitoring network traffic without causing any performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
10 months ago
I think A could also be a good choice, caching credibility scores for visited websites can help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
10 months ago
I agree, D seems like the best option for monitoring network traffic efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francesco
1 year ago
B is definitely wrong. Allowing packets that fail the Network Packet Sanity Check would be a security risk, not a feature.
upvoted 0 times
Tamekia
10 months ago
D) Live packet streams coming through the network engine will be replicated and all traffic analysis will be performed on the replicated stream
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
10 months ago
C) Any events generated by computers within your corporate network, as defined by an IP address range, will be ignored
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
10 months ago
A) The credibility scores for visited web sites will be cached. If access to the web site is requested again within 30 minutes, its credibility score will be retrieved from the cache instead of the configured Smart Protection source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
10 months ago
D) Live packet streams coming through the network engine will be replicated and all traffic analysis will be performed on the replicated stream
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
11 months ago
C) Any events generated by computers within your corporate network, as defined by an IP address range, will be ignored
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
11 months ago
A) The credibility scores for visited web sites will be cached. If access to the web site is requested again within 30 minutes, its credibility score will be retrieved from the cache instead of the configured Smart Protection source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
D) Live packet streams coming through the network engine will be replicated and all traffic analysis will be performed on the replicated stream
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
12 months ago
C) Any events generated by computers within your corporate network, as defined by an IP address range, will be ignored
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
12 months ago
A) The credibility scores for visited web sites will be cached. If access to the web site is requested again within 30 minutes, its credibility score will be retrieved from the cache instead of the configured Smart Protection source.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaun
1 year ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I see why D could be the correct answer as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D. Replicating live packet streams allows for thorough traffic analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 year ago
Option A is correct. Caching credibility scores for visited websites makes sense to improve performance if the same site is accessed again within a short timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
11 months ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but option A seems to be the most logical choice based on the details provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
12 months ago
But what about the other options? Do you think they could also be true?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
12 months ago
I agree, it would save time if the credibility score is retrieved from the cache instead of the Smart Protection source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
12 months ago
I think option A is correct. Caching credibility scores for visited websites can improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaun
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. It makes sense to cache credibility scores for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I see where you're coming from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D. Replicating live packet streams seems more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. It makes sense to cache credibility scores for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel