New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Tibco TCP-BW6 Exam - Topic 5 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tibco's TCP-BW6 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 5
[All TCP-BW6 Questions]

With multicast feature enabled at server side, which class contains the methods to disable the multicast feature at client side?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Wenona
4 months ago
I agree, TibjmsConnectionFactory is the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
4 months ago
No way, it's Session!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
4 months ago
I thought it was ConnectionFactory?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
5 months ago
It's definitely TibjmsConnectionFactory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
5 months ago
I have a vague memory of Session being involved in multicast configurations, but I can't quite place it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards B, Connection, but I can't recall if it specifically handles multicast settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like ConnectionFactory was mentioned a lot in those examples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
5 months ago
I think the answer might be A, TibjmsConnectionFactory, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right class for disabling multicast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky routing configuration question. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which factors are most important for a consultant to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'm not sure which two would be the correct choices for setting the persistence and transport provider. I'll have to double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The provider said the update is causing the calls to fail, so the solution is likely to disable the update-related functionality. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the fraud risk assessment can't just replace the auditor's own assessment, that sounds unreliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how there's about 68% within 1 standard deviation, but I'm not sure how that translates to 1.5 standard deviations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure on this one. Is it possible the chart could also show the number of product backlog items completed? I'll have to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel