New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Tibco TCP-BW6 Exam - Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tibco's TCP-BW6 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 3
[All TCP-BW6 Questions]

Which three field names are found on the Outbound Packet Total on the Service Information page of the Rendezvous daemon (RVD) HTTP Administrator interface? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

by Tarra at May 03, 2022, 10:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TCP-BW6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ashton
4 months ago
I agree with lost MC and bad pkts, but missed MC feels wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
4 months ago
Wait, are you sure about lost PTP? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
Nah, it's definitely lost PTP instead of shed MC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
4 months ago
I think shed MC is in there too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
5 months ago
Definitely lost MC, bad pkts, and missed MC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I think "missed MC" was definitely one of the options we discussed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
5 months ago
I feel like "bad pkts" might be on there too, but I can't recall if it was specifically for outbound packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
5 months ago
I think I remember "lost MC" being one of the fields, but I'm not entirely sure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
5 months ago
I’m really uncertain about "shed MC"—it sounds familiar, but I can't picture it in the context of the RVD interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'm not too familiar with the IBM Content Search Services, so I'll need to think through the options carefully. I'm leaning towards either B or D, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
5 months ago
The 24-hour delay in associating new user devices with ContactKeys is an important consideration. The customer should be aware that there will be a temporary gap in their ability to fully track and engage with newly registered users during that period. Option D seems like the most relevant recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'd go with option B - an HDP pool with FMD drives should provide the low latency required for the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
5 months ago
Could it possibly be being conceptually systematic? I remember that term, but I'm not sure how it connects directly to the idea of behaviors just appearing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
I'm not entirely confident about this one. I'll need to review my notes on ARMS-Prometheus to make sure I'm answering correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel