Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OGEA-10B Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-10B exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 3
[All OGEA-10B Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

Your role is that of a consultant to the Lead Enterprise Architect in a multinational automotive manufacturer.

The company has a corporate strategy that focuses on electrification of its portfolio, and it has invested

heavily in a new shared car platform to use across all its brands. The company has four manufacturing

facilities, one in North America, two in Europe, and one in Asia.

A challenge that the company is facing is to scale up the number of vehicles coming off the production line to meet customer demand, while maintaining quality. There are significant supply chain shortages for electronic components, which are impacting production. In response to this the company has taken on new suppliers and has also taken design and production of the battery pack in-house.

The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice. The TOGAF standard is used for developing

the process and systems used to design, manufacture, and test the battery pack. The Chief Information

Officer and the Chief Operating Officer co-sponsor the Enterprise Architecture program.

As part of putting the new battery pack into production, adjustments to the assembly processes need to be made. A pilot project has been completed at a single location. The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the activity, and the Architecture Board have approved the plan for implementation and migration at each plant.

Draft Architecture Contracts have been developed that detail the work needed to implement and deploy the new processes for each location. The company mixes internal teams with a few third-party contractors at the locations. The Chief Engineer has expressed concern that the deployment will not be consistent and of acceptable quality.

Refer to the scenario

The Lead Enterprise Architect has asked you to review the draft Architecture Contracts and recommend the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern.

Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The Architecture Requirements Specification is one of the TOGAF deliverables that provides a set of quantitative statements that outline what an implementation project must do in order to comply with the architecture12. It is a companion to the Architecture Definition Document, which provides a qualitative view of the solution and aims to communicate the intent of the architect. The Architecture Requirements Specification provides a quantitative view of the solution, stating measurable criteria that must be met during the implementation of the architecture3. It typically forms a major component of an implementation contract or contract for more detailed Architecture Definition4. Reference:

* Deliverable: Architecture Requirements Specification - The Open Group

* Architecture Requirements Specification - Visual Paradigm Community Circle

* The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Definitions - The Open Group

* The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Architecture Requirements Specification - The Open Group


Contribute your Thoughts:

Howard
1 months ago
Maybe they should just call in the Ghostbusters to bust any ghosts in the machine during the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
Art
3 days ago
C) You review the contracts ensuring that they address project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. Third-party contracts must be legally enforceable. You recommend a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the process to be customized for local needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
8 days ago
A: D) You recommend that the Architecture Contracts be used to manage the architecture governance processes across the locations. You recommend deployment of monitoring tools to assess the performance of each completed battery pack at each location and develop change requirements if necessary. If a deviation from the contract is detected, the Architecture Board should allow the Architecture Contract to be modified to meet the local needs. In such cases they should issue a new Request for Architecture Work to implement a modification to the Architecture Definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
10 days ago
A) For changes requested by an internal team, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. For contracts issued to third-party contractors, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
24 days ago
B: C) You review the contracts ensuring that they address project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. Third-party contracts must be legally enforceable. You recommend a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the process to be customized for local needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
28 days ago
A: A) For changes requested by an internal team, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. For contracts issued to third-party contractors, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickole
1 months ago
Option D seems like overkill. Do we really need to issue a new Request for Architecture Work every time there's a deviation? That's just bureaucracy gone wild.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
1 months ago
I'm not sure, this all sounds a bit too complicated for my liking. Can we just get a robot to handle the whole thing and call it a day?
upvoted 0 times
Vannessa
18 days ago
User 1: That does sound complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coral
1 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Allowing the Architecture Board to grant dispensations for customizations to meet local needs is important for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 months ago
The correct answer is C. The Enterprise Architect should review the contracts to ensure they cover all the key aspects and that third-party contracts are legally enforceable. Compliance reviews at key points are a good idea to ensure consistent deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. We need to ensure that the contracts address project objectives and have compliance reviews in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
I agree with you, Yun. It's important to have clear guidelines in place for both internal teams and contractors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
2 months ago
I think the best approach is to have a memorandum of understanding for internal teams and enforceable contracts for third-party contractors.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel