The Open Group OGEA-101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-101 exam

Question #: 6
Topic #: 1

When considering the scope of an architecture, what dimension considers to what level of detail the architecting effort should go?

AProject

BBreadth

CDepth

DArchitecture Domains

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The scope of an architecture is the extent and level of detail of the architecture work. The scope of an architecture can be defined along four dimensions: project, breadth, depth, and architecture domains. The project dimension considers the boundaries and objectives of the architecture project, such as the time frame, budget, resources, and deliverables. The breadth dimension considers the coverage and completeness of the architecture across the enterprise, such as the organizational units, business functions, processes, and locations. The depth dimension considers the level of detail and specificity of the architecture, such as the granularity, abstraction, and precision of the architectural elements and relationships. The architecture domains dimension considers the aspects or segments of the architecture, such as the business, data, application, and technology domains.

Therefore, the depth dimension is the one that considers to what level of detail the architecting effort should go.

by Melodie at Feb 10, 2024, 05:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OGEA-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elli

3 months ago

Architecture Domains sounds interesting too, but not the main focus here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ma

3 months ago

Agreed, Depth is crucial for understanding the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghann

3 months ago

Wait, is Depth really the right answer? Seems too obvious.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michell

4 months ago

I think Breadth is more important for overall scope.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

4 months ago

It's definitely about the Depth of detail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

4 months ago

I keep mixing up "Depth" and "Breadth," but I think "Depth" is definitely about the level of detail we go into.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

4 months ago

I feel like this is similar to a practice question we did on architecture scopes, and "Depth" seems to fit best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernie

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "Breadth" covering the range of topics, not the detail level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edward

5 months ago

I think the answer might be "Depth," since it relates to how detailed the architecture needs to be.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glen

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'm leaning towards C. Depth, but I'm also wondering if it could be B. Breadth, since that might also be considered a dimension of the architecture's scope. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joaquin

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident the answer is C. Depth. The question is clearly asking about the level of detail the architecture should cover, so that's the dimension I would focus on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanesha

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The question is specifically asking about the level of detail, so the answer has to be C. Depth. That makes the most sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanice

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. Is it asking about the overall scope of the architecture or just the level of detail? I'm not sure if I should go with Breadth or Depth here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Temeka

5 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I think it might be asking about the level of detail the architecture should cover, so I'm guessing the answer is C. Depth.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the preferred style for Kubernetes and cloud-native apps is declarative. That's the whole idea behind Kubernetes - defining the desired state and letting the system handle the implementation.

upvoted 0 times

...