New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-3002 Exam - Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3002 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All SPLK-3002 Questions]

ITSI Saved Search Scheduling is configured to use realtime_schedule = 0. Which statement is accurate about this configuration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

If set to 0, the scheduler determines the next scheduled search run time based on the last run time for the search. This is called continuous scheduling.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Reid
4 months ago
Not sure about C, seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
4 months ago
D sounds right to me, it aligns with how schedulers usually work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
4 months ago
Wait, can the scheduler really skip periods? That's wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
4 months ago
I think B makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
A is definitely correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
5 months ago
I recall something about the scheduler potentially skipping periods to ensure it runs the most recent data, so maybe that's the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought setting it to 0 would mean it runs based on the current time, but that doesn’t seem right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question similar to this before, and I think it had to do with how the scheduler handles timing. Maybe it's about skipping periods?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
I think I remember that setting realtime_schedule to 0 means the scheduler looks at the last execution time, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
5 months ago
The key here is to scale the infrastructure to support the increased user base. Adding more memory and switching to a process-centric design could also help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which partition is not part of the cluster node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
5 months ago
I think reputation damage could be seen as a consequential loss, but I'm not sure if it's the most likely one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel