Splunk Exam SPLK-2003 Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2003 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 1

[All SPLK-2003 Questions]

A user has written a playbook that calls three other playbooks, one after the other. The user notices that the second playbook starts executing before the first one completes. What is the cause of this behavior?

ASynchronous execution has not been configured.

BThe first playbook is performing poorly.

CThe sleep option for the second playbook is not set to a long enough interval.

DIncorrect join configuration on the second playbook.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Carmela at May 13, 2024, 11:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Willodean

2 months ago

Whoever wrote this question must have a twisted sense of humor. It's like they're testing our ability to debug playbook synchronization issues while juggling clowns and unicycles in the background.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rochell

2 months ago

Aha, I bet it's C! The sleep option on the second playbook probably needs to be longer to give the first one enough time to finish. Unless, of course, the second playbook is just really eager and can't wait its turn.

upvoted 0 times

Nana

20 days ago

It could also be D) Incorrect join configuration on the second playbook.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

1 months ago

I agree with you, it could be C) The sleep option for the second playbook is not set to a long enough interval.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

1 months ago

Maybe the first playbook is just slow, option B) The first playbook is performing poorly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

2 months ago

I think it might be A) Synchronous execution has not been configured.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

3 months ago

Hold up, are we sure it's not B? Maybe the first playbook is just too slow, and that's why the second one is jumping the gun. I've seen that happen before.

upvoted 0 times

Julio

1 months ago

A) Synchronous execution has not been configured.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

1 months ago

B) The first playbook is performing poorly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

1 months ago

A) Synchronous execution has not been configured.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruth

3 months ago

I was thinking it might be A. If synchronous execution isn't configured, the playbooks could run in parallel, causing the second one to start before the first finishes.

upvoted 0 times

Alease

2 months ago

C) The sleep option for the second playbook is not set to a long enough interval.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

2 months ago

B) The first playbook is performing poorly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chau

2 months ago

A) Synchronous execution has not been configured.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellen

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm pretty sure the answer is D. The join configuration on the second playbook is likely not set up correctly to wait for the first one to complete.

upvoted 0 times