New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-2003 Exam - Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2003 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All SPLK-2003 Questions]

When configuring a Splunk asset for Phantom to connect to a SplunkC loud instance, the user discovers that they need to be able to run two different on_poll searches. How is this possible

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Candida
3 months ago
D makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenia
3 months ago
Definitely not A, that won't work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
4 months ago
Wait, can you really run two queries like that? Sounds tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
4 months ago
I think option B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
4 months ago
You can run multiple queries by configuring a second asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that installing a second app could be an option, but it seems like overkill for just two queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we need to create a second asset or if we can just modify the existing one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
5 months ago
I feel like I practiced a question similar to this, and I think configuring the second query in the Phantom app might be the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
I think I remember something about entering multiple queries, but I’m not sure if it was comma separated or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Configuring the second query in the Phantom app for Splunk seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused. Can we really just enter the two queries as comma-separated values? That doesn't seem quite right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
5 months ago
I've got it! The answer must be D. We need to configure a second Splunk asset with the second query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is being able to run multiple on_poll searches. I'm not sure if that's possible with just one asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the definition of executory contracts. I'm pretty confident I can answer this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
5 months ago
I remember a similar question about operator overloading, and it caused issues then. Maybe it won't compile because of the 'this?>' typo in setA?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
10 months ago
Wait, I thought Splunk was supposed to be all about simplicity? Now we've got to spin up a whole second asset just to run a couple of searches? This must be what they mean by 'enterprise-grade complexity'.
upvoted 0 times
Walton
9 months ago
C) Install a second Splunk app and configure the query in the second app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
9 months ago
B) Configure the second query in the Phantom app for Splunk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
9 months ago
A) Enter the two queries in the asset as comma separated values.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniel
10 months ago
Wow, two on_poll searches? That's a lot of work. I guess you could try Option A, but that's just going to make everything look like a jumbled mess. Might as well just go with the separate asset approach.
upvoted 0 times
Weldon
9 months ago
True, having a separate asset for each query could be cleaner and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
9 months ago
I agree, Option A might get messy. Maybe setting up a separate asset is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
10 months ago
Yeah, it does seem like a lot of work. But maybe Option A could work if you organize it well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gayla
10 months ago
Option B is intriguing, but I have a feeling that's going to lead to some serious headaches down the line. Better to keep the Splunk and Phantom stuff separate, like Option D suggests.
upvoted 0 times
Carman
8 months ago
That sounds like a solid plan to avoid any potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
8 months ago
I think I'll go with Option D and configure a second Splunk asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
8 months ago
Yeah, it's probably less complicated that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
9 months ago
I agree, keeping Splunk and Phantom separate seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Filiberto
10 months ago
I think option D) Configure a second Splunk asset with the second query makes more sense, as it keeps things separate and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Configure the second query in the Phantom app for Splunk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
11 months ago
I'm not sure why you'd want to run two different on_poll searches, but if that's what's required, then Option D is the best choice. Trying to cram everything into one asset just seems like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
9 months ago
That way each query can be managed independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
9 months ago
I think having a separate Splunk asset for the second query is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
Agreed, trying to cram everything into one asset seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
Option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynelle
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Enter the two queries in the asset as comma separated values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
11 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. You need to configure a second Splunk asset to run the second on_poll search. Keeping things organized and separated is key in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel