Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-2003 Exam - Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Posted by Jerry on Aug 28, 2023 at 02:49 PM

When configuring a Splunk asset for Phantom to connect to a SplunkC loud instance, the user discovers that they need to be able to run two different on_poll searches. How is this possible

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium SPLK-2003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
CA
Candida 11 months ago
D makes the most sense to me.
KE
Kenia 11 months ago
Definitely not A, that won't work.
JO
Johanna 11 months ago
Wait, can you really run two queries like that? Sounds tricky.
BE
Belen 11 months ago
I think option B is the way to go!
MA
Marget 12 months ago
You can run multiple queries by configuring a second asset.
TO
Toshia 12 months ago
I vaguely recall that installing a second app could be an option, but it seems like overkill for just two queries.
LE
Leota 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we need to create a second asset or if we can just modify the existing one.
EL
Eleonore 1 year ago
I feel like I practiced a question similar to this, and I think configuring the second query in the Phantom app might be the right approach.
WI
Willard 1 year ago
I think I remember something about entering multiple queries, but I’m not sure if it was comma separated or something else.
MO
Mona 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards B. Configuring the second query in the Phantom app for Splunk seems like the most straightforward approach.
IS
Isadora 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused. Can we really just enter the two queries as comma-separated values? That doesn't seem quite right to me.
AY
Ayesha 1 year ago
I've got it! The answer must be D. We need to configure a second Splunk asset with the second query.
DI
Dianne 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is being able to run multiple on_poll searches. I'm not sure if that's possible with just one asset.
YO
Yolando 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
LA
Lavonda 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
BE
Ben 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the definition of executory contracts. I'm pretty confident I can answer this correctly.
OD
Odette 1 year ago
I remember a similar question about operator overloading, and it caused issues then. Maybe it won't compile because of the 'this?>' typo in setA?
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
Wait, I thought Splunk was supposed to be all about simplicity? Now we've got to spin up a whole second asset just to run a couple of searches? This must be what they mean by 'enterprise-grade complexity'.
WA
Walton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ettie
C) Install a second Splunk app and configure the query in the second app.
OC
Ocie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ettie
B) Configure the second query in the Phantom app for Splunk.
AL
Aleta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ettie
A) Enter the two queries in the asset as comma separated values.
DA
Daniel 1 year ago
Wow, two on_poll searches? That's a lot of work. I guess you could try Option A, but that's just going to make everything look like a jumbled mess. Might as well just go with the separate asset approach.
WE
Weldon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daniel
True, having a separate asset for each query could be cleaner and easier to manage.
JO
Joseph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daniel
I agree, Option A might get messy. Maybe setting up a separate asset is the way to go.
GA
Gary 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daniel
Yeah, it does seem like a lot of work. But maybe Option A could work if you organize it well.
GA
Gayla 1 year ago
Option B is intriguing, but I have a feeling that's going to lead to some serious headaches down the line. Better to keep the Splunk and Phantom stuff separate, like Option D suggests.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gayla
That sounds like a solid plan to avoid any potential issues.
KE
Keena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gayla
I think I'll go with Option D and configure a second Splunk asset.
KA
Kayleigh 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gayla
Yeah, it's probably less complicated that way.
JE
Jerlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gayla
I agree, keeping Splunk and Phantom separate seems like a good idea.
FI
Filiberto 1 year ago
I think option D) Configure a second Splunk asset with the second query makes more sense, as it keeps things separate and organized.
JO
Johnson 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Configure the second query in the Phantom app for Splunk.
TH
Theron 2 years ago
I'm not sure why you'd want to run two different on_poll searches, but if that's what's required, then Option D is the best choice. Trying to cram everything into one asset just seems like a recipe for disaster.
LA
Lajuana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theron
That way each query can be managed independently.
RU
Rupert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theron
I think having a separate Splunk asset for the second query is the way to go.
MA
Margurite 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theron
Agreed, trying to cram everything into one asset seems risky.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Theron
Option D is the best choice.
LY
Lynelle 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Enter the two queries in the asset as comma separated values.
BE
Beckie 2 years ago
Option D seems like the way to go. You need to configure a second Splunk asset to run the second on_poll search. Keeping things organized and separated is key in these situations.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel