Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-2003 Exam - Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Posted by Stevie on Jul 24, 2023 at 02:31 AM

When writing a custom function that uses regex to extract the domain name from a URL, a user wants to create a new artifact for the extracted domain. Which of the following Python API calls will create a new artifact?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium SPLK-2003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
KR
Kris 11 months ago
Really? I didn't expect that!
MA
Madalyn 11 months ago
I thought phantom.add_artifact() was the right one!
FR
Francesco 11 months ago
Wait, is phantom.new_artifact() not an option?
JO
Joesph 11 months ago
Yeah, I agree with that!
FE
Felix 12 months ago
I think it's phantom.create_artifact() for sure.
CA
Carole 12 months ago
I vaguely recall that phantom.update() was used for something else, so I don’t think that’s the right choice for creating a new artifact.
GR
Graciela 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards phantom.add_artifact() because it sounds like it fits the context, but I’m not completely confident.
SH
Shenika 1 year ago
I feel like we practiced something similar in class, and I want to say it was phantom.create_artifact(), but I could be mixing it up with another function.
AR
Arlyne 1 year ago
I think I remember that the function to create a new artifact is something like phantom.new_artifact(), but I'm not entirely sure.
JO
Jonell 1 year ago
Okay, let me see. I know privacy laws cover things like personally identifiable information, so I'm leaning towards B or D.
SH
Shasta 1 year ago
I remember this being similar to a practice question we had, and I believe the statement is true.
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on performance testing tools and their responsibilities.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
Honestly, I'm not too sure. I remember we discussed user story articulation, but that feels more relevant to agile approaches than strict business architecture.
SU
Sueann 1 year ago
Regex? More like 're-gex' if you ask me. But C) phantom.create_artifact() is definitely the way to go.
OR
Orville 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sueann
Sounds good, let's use phantom.create_artifact() for the new artifact.
AL
Alaine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sueann
Let's go with C) phantom.create_artifact() then.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sueann
I agree, that's the correct API call to create a new artifact.
AM
Amber 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sueann
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the right choice.
MA
Marylyn 1 year ago
D) phantom.add_artifact() could work, but it's a bit vague. I'm confident that C) phantom.create_artifact() is the way to go here.
RE
Ressie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marylyn
Let's go with phantom.create_artifact() to create the new artifact.
CA
Cassie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marylyn
I agree, phantom.create_artifact() seems like the right choice.
PA
Pa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marylyn
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the best option.
PA
Paris 1 year ago
A) phantom.new_artifact() looks promising, but I'm not sure if it's a real Python API call. I'll play it safe and go with C) phantom.create_artifact().
CA
Cammy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User4: I'm going to stick with A) phantom.new_artifact(), it sounds promising.
CL
Claribel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User3: I agree with User2, C) phantom.create_artifact() seems safer.
LE
Lea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User2: I'm not sure about that, I'm going with C) phantom.create_artifact().
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User1: I think A) phantom.new_artifact() is the right choice.
TH
Theola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User4: Let's try C) phantom.create_artifact() and see if it works.
AR
Arlette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User3: I agree, C) phantom.create_artifact() seems like the right choice.
FR
Frederica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User2: I'm not sure about that, I'll go with C) phantom.create_artifact() just to be safe.
GI
Gianna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User1: I think A) phantom.new_artifact() might work.
CH
Chaya 1 year ago
B) phantom.update() sounds like it would update an existing artifact, not create a new one. I'm going with C) phantom.create_artifact().
BE
Benedict 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chaya
Yeah, phantom.update() does seem like it would update an existing artifact. Create_artifact() is the way to go.
NA
Nathan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chaya
I think you're right, phantom.create_artifact() does sound like it would create a new artifact.
DE
Devorah 1 year ago
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the correct answer. It's the only option that specifically mentions creating a new artifact.
PA
Paris 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) phantom.add_artifact() could also be a possible option
LE
Leonora 2 years ago
I agree with Son, creating a new artifact would require using phantom.create_artifact()
SO
Son 2 years ago
I think the answer is C) phantom.create_artifact()
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel