Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-2003 Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2003 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 1
[All SPLK-2003 Questions]

When writing a custom function that uses regex to extract the domain name from a URL, a user wants to create a new artifact for the extracted domain. Which of the following Python API calls will create a new artifact?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sueann
2 months ago
Regex? More like 're-gex' if you ask me. But C) phantom.create_artifact() is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Orville
12 days ago
Sounds good, let's use phantom.create_artifact() for the new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
23 days ago
Let's go with C) phantom.create_artifact() then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
26 days ago
I agree, that's the correct API call to create a new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
28 days ago
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marylyn
3 months ago
D) phantom.add_artifact() could work, but it's a bit vague. I'm confident that C) phantom.create_artifact() is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
1 months ago
Let's go with phantom.create_artifact() to create the new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 months ago
I agree, phantom.create_artifact() seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
2 months ago
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
3 months ago
A) phantom.new_artifact() looks promising, but I'm not sure if it's a real Python API call. I'll play it safe and go with C) phantom.create_artifact().
upvoted 0 times
Cammy
28 days ago
User4: I'm going to stick with A) phantom.new_artifact(), it sounds promising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 months ago
User3: I agree with User2, C) phantom.create_artifact() seems safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 months ago
User2: I'm not sure about that, I'm going with C) phantom.create_artifact().
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 months ago
User1: I think A) phantom.new_artifact() is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 months ago
User4: Let's try C) phantom.create_artifact() and see if it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 months ago
User3: I agree, C) phantom.create_artifact() seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
2 months ago
User2: I'm not sure about that, I'll go with C) phantom.create_artifact() just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
2 months ago
User1: I think A) phantom.new_artifact() might work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
3 months ago
B) phantom.update() sounds like it would update an existing artifact, not create a new one. I'm going with C) phantom.create_artifact().
upvoted 0 times
Benedict
3 months ago
Yeah, phantom.update() does seem like it would update an existing artifact. Create_artifact() is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
3 months ago
I think you're right, phantom.create_artifact() does sound like it would create a new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
3 months ago
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the correct answer. It's the only option that specifically mentions creating a new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) phantom.add_artifact() could also be a possible option
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
4 months ago
I agree with Son, creating a new artifact would require using phantom.create_artifact()
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) phantom.create_artifact()
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel