Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

Which of the following Splunk deployments has the recommended minimum components for a high-availability search head cluster?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Roselle at Aug 09, 2023, 12:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hui
6 months ago
How can 1 search head be high-availability? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
6 months ago
I thought it was option D, but B seems solid too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
7 months ago
Wait, isn't 2 search heads enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
7 months ago
Definitely agree with B, it covers all bases!
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
7 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
7 months ago
I thought the minimum was 3 search heads, so I’m hesitant about A and D. Maybe B is the right choice after all?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards D because it has 2 search heads, but I’m confused about whether that’s enough for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question about search head clusters, and I feel like 3 search heads is a common recommendation for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
8 months ago
I think the answer might be B, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the minimum requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
8 months ago
I think the Setup Audit Trail is the best place to check for recent changes. It should give me a detailed log of all the changes made in the org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
8 months ago
This is a tough call. I can see the merits of both the private and public approaches. Ultimately, I think I'd lean towards option A and try to have a discreet conversation with Steve first. Hopefully, he'll be receptive to some feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
8 months ago
This looks like a good opportunity to apply my knowledge of Salesforce Communities configuration. I'm feeling confident I can identify the right steps to complete the self-registration process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The user would want to use a dial-up connection to access sites blocked by the organization's proxy server. That seems like the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
1 year ago
Looks like the Splunk folks want us to have a 'high-availability' cluster, not a 'high-anxiety' cluster. I'm voting for Option B - it's the Goldilocks of Splunk setups, just right!
upvoted 0 times
Dexter
12 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems to be the recommended minimum components for a high-availability search head cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
12 months ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the best choice for a high-availability search head cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
12 months ago
Option B sounds good to me too. Three of everything for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francoise
1 year ago
Hold up, are we sure we need a deployer at all? Isn't that just a fancy way of saying 'someone who deploys stuff'? I say we skip the middleman and go with Option C!
upvoted 0 times
Andra
11 months ago
Sounds good, Option C it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
11 months ago
I agree, let's go with Option C for the minimum components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
11 months ago
But do we really need 3 search heads for high availability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
1 year ago
I think we do need a deployer for managing configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
1 year ago
Option A? Really? Two search heads and only one deployer? That's not going to cut it for a high-availability cluster. I'm out.
upvoted 0 times
Andrew
12 months ago
Option B is the correct choice for a high-availability search head cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
12 months ago
D) 2 search heads, 1 deployer, 3 indexers
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
12 months ago
C) 1 search head, 1 deployer, 3 indexers
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
1 year ago
B) 3 search heads, 1 deployer, 3 indexers
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
1 year ago
A) 2 search heads, 1 deployer, 2 indexers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Two search heads with a dedicated deployer and three indexers seems like it covers all the bases for a high-availability setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Three search heads for redundancy and three indexers for high availability - sounds like a solid setup to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel