Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 3

[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

Which of the following Splunk deployments has the recommended minimum components for a high-availability search head cluster?

A2 search heads, 1 deployer, 2 indexers

B3 search heads, 1 deployer, 3 indexers

C1 search head, 1 deployer, 3 indexers

D2 search heads, 1 deployer, 3 indexers

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Roselle at Aug 09, 2023, 12:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Hui

8 months ago

How can 1 search head be high-availability? Sounds off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

8 months ago

I thought it was option D, but B seems solid too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josefa

8 months ago

Wait, isn't 2 search heads enough?

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

8 months ago

Definitely agree with B, it covers all bases!

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

9 months ago

I think option B is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

9 months ago

I thought the minimum was 3 search heads, so I’m hesitant about A and D. Maybe B is the right choice after all?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alexia

9 months ago

I’m leaning towards D because it has 2 search heads, but I’m confused about whether that’s enough for high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

9 months ago

I remember practicing a question about search head clusters, and I feel like 3 search heads is a common recommendation for high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

9 months ago

I think the answer might be B, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the minimum requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

9 months ago

I think the Setup Audit Trail is the best place to check for recent changes. It should give me a detailed log of all the changes made in the org.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winifred

9 months ago

This is a tough call. I can see the merits of both the private and public approaches. Ultimately, I think I'd lean towards option A and try to have a discreet conversation with Steve first. Hopefully, he'll be receptive to some feedback.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacki

9 months ago

This looks like a good opportunity to apply my knowledge of Salesforce Communities configuration. I'm feeling confident I can identify the right steps to complete the self-registration process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawna

10 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The user would want to use a dial-up connection to access sites blocked by the organization's proxy server. That seems like the most likely reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

1 year ago

Looks like the Splunk folks want us to have a 'high-availability' cluster, not a 'high-anxiety' cluster. I'm voting for Option B - it's the Goldilocks of Splunk setups, just right!

upvoted 0 times

Dexter

1 year ago

Yeah, Option B seems to be the recommended minimum components for a high-availability search head cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Richelle

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems to be the best choice for a high-availability search head cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

1 year ago

Option B sounds good to me too. Three of everything for high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Francoise

1 year ago

Hold up, are we sure we need a deployer at all? Isn't that just a fancy way of saying 'someone who deploys stuff'? I say we skip the middleman and go with Option C!

upvoted 0 times

Andra

1 year ago

Sounds good, Option C it is then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

1 year ago

I agree, let's go with Option C for the minimum components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willetta

1 year ago

But do we really need 3 search heads for high availability?

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

1 year ago

I think we do need a deployer for managing configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Della

1 year ago

Option A? Really? Two search heads and only one deployer? That's not going to cut it for a high-availability cluster. I'm out.

upvoted 0 times

Andrew

1 year ago

Option B is the correct choice for a high-availability search head cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aaron

1 year ago

D) 2 search heads, 1 deployer, 3 indexers

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

1 year ago

C) 1 search head, 1 deployer, 3 indexers

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

1 year ago

B) 3 search heads, 1 deployer, 3 indexers

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

1 year ago

A) 2 search heads, 1 deployer, 2 indexers

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Desmond

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards Option D. Two search heads with a dedicated deployer and three indexers seems like it covers all the bases for a high-availability setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacey

1 year ago

Option B seems like the way to go. Three search heads for redundancy and three indexers for high availability - sounds like a solid setup to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

1 year ago

I think the answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...