Looks like the Splunk folks want us to have a 'high-availability' cluster, not a 'high-anxiety' cluster. I'm voting for Option B - it's the Goldilocks of Splunk setups, just right!
Hold up, are we sure we need a deployer at all? Isn't that just a fancy way of saying 'someone who deploys stuff'? I say we skip the middleman and go with Option C!
I'm leaning towards Option D. Two search heads with a dedicated deployer and three indexers seems like it covers all the bases for a high-availability setup.
Curtis
1 months agoRichelle
22 hours agoBenton
3 days agoFrancoise
1 months agoPeggie
10 days agoDella
2 months agoFelicidad
Carey
17 days agoKristofer
1 months agoDesmond
2 months agoRegenia
2 months agoLacey
2 months agoShenika
2 months agoMaryann
2 months ago