Looks like the Splunk folks want us to have a 'high-availability' cluster, not a 'high-anxiety' cluster. I'm voting for Option B - it's the Goldilocks of Splunk setups, just right!
Hold up, are we sure we need a deployer at all? Isn't that just a fancy way of saying 'someone who deploys stuff'? I say we skip the middleman and go with Option C!
I'm leaning towards Option D. Two search heads with a dedicated deployer and three indexers seems like it covers all the bases for a high-availability setup.
Curtis
3 months agoDexter
1 months agoRichelle
2 months agoBenton
2 months agoFrancoise
3 months agoAndra
1 months agoLili
1 months agoWilletta
1 months agoPeggie
2 months agoDella
3 months agoAndrew
1 months agoAaron
2 months agoFelicidad
2 months agoCarey
2 months agoKristofer
3 months agoDesmond
3 months agoRegenia
3 months agoLacey
3 months agoShenika
4 months agoMaryann
4 months ago