Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk Exam SPLK-2002 Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 3
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

An indexer cluster is being designed with the following characteristics:

* 10 search peers

* Replication Factor (RF): 4

* Search Factor (SF): 3

* No SmartStore usage

How many search peers can fail before data becomes unsearchable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lonna at Jan 06, 2023, 09:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ben
2 months ago
Wait, so if four peers fail, we can still search? That's like trying to find a needle in a haystack, but the haystack is on fire. Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the answer is B) One peer can fail. The replication factor of 4 means we need at least 3 peers to search, so if one peer fails, we're still good.
upvoted 0 times
Beckie
1 months ago
Yes, losing one peer out of 10 should still allow us to search the data without any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
Good to know, thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 months ago
That makes sense, with a replication factor of 4 and a search factor of 3, we can afford to lose one peer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
2 months ago
That's correct, as long as only one peer fails, we can still search the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
2 months ago
I agree, the answer is B) One peer can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
2 months ago
I agree, the answer is B) One peer can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Portia
3 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The replication factor seems to be the key here, but I can't quite figure it out. I'll have to think about it some more.
upvoted 0 times
Darnell
1 months ago
D) Four peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
C) Three peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 months ago
B) One peer can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
1 months ago
A) Zero peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
D) Four peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
1 months ago
C) Three peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
B) One peer can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
2 months ago
A) Zero peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
3 months ago
Well, if 4 peers fail, that means we'd still have 6 peers left, which is above the search factor of 3, so I think D) Four peers can fail is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
3 months ago
Hmm, let me think about this. With 10 search peers, a replication factor of 4, and a search factor of 3, I'd say that C) Three peers can fail is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Denise
2 months ago
That makes sense, one peer can fail without affecting the searchability of the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
2 months ago
I agree, C) Three peers can fail is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but it makes sense that if we have 10 search peers and a Replication Factor of 4, we can tolerate losing three of them before data becomes unsearchable. So, I'll go with C) Three peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
3 months ago
I agree with Paola, because with a Replication Factor of 4 and Search Factor of 3, we can afford to lose up to three search peers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) Three peers can fail.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel