Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 15 Question 109 Discussion

Which of the following is a valid use case that a search head cluster addresses?
C) Knowledge Object replication.
A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails.
B) Search affinity.
D) Increased Search Factor (SF).

Splunk SPLK-2002 Exam - Topic 15 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 15
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

Which of the following is a valid use case that a search head cluster addresses?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer isC. Knowledge Object replication.This is a valid use case that a search head cluster addresses, as it ensures that all the search heads in the cluster have the same set of knowledge objects, such as saved searches, dashboards, reports, and alerts1.The search head cluster replicates the knowledge objects across the cluster members, and synchronizes any changes or updates1.This provides a consistent user experience and avoids data inconsistency or duplication1. The other options are not valid use cases that a search head cluster addresses.Option A, providing redundancy in the event a search peer fails, is not a use case for a search head cluster, but for an indexer cluster, which maintains multiple copies of the indexed data and can recover from indexer failures2.Option B, search affinity, is not a use case for a search head cluster, but for a multisite indexer cluster, which allows the search heads to preferentially search the data on the local site, rather than on a remote site3.Option D, increased Search Factor (SF), is not a use case for a search head cluster, but for an indexer cluster, which determines how many searchable copies of each bucket are maintained across the indexers4. Therefore, option C is the correct answer, and options A, B, and D are incorrect.

1: About search head clusters2: About indexer clusters and index replication3: Configure search affinity4: Configure the search factor


by Sophia at Mar 20, 2025, 04:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dianne
7 months ago
B is important for optimizing searches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
7 months ago
Wait, can a search head cluster really do that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
7 months ago
Not sure about D, seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
7 months ago
I think C is more relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
8 months ago
A is definitely a valid use case!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
8 months ago
Increased Search Factor seems like a trick option to me. I don't remember it being a primary function of search head clusters, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because I remember knowledge object replication being a key topic, but I’m not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
8 months ago
I feel like we discussed search affinity in class, but I can't recall if it was specifically related to search head clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
9 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the right answer. I remember something about redundancy in clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know search head clusters are used for redundancy, but the other options are throwing me off. I'll have to review my notes and try to remember the key use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
9 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. A search head cluster is used to provide redundancy, so option A is definitely correct. The other options seem a bit more obscure, so I'll have to weigh those carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I know search head clusters provide redundancy, but I'm not sure about the other options. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
9 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about the use cases of a search head cluster. I'm confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 year ago
I think D) Increased Search Factor (SF) can also improve search performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
1 year ago
I believe C) Knowledge Object replication is also crucial for consistency across the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 year ago
I agree with Kiera, having redundancy is important for reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
1 year ago
Increased Search Factor (SF)? Is that like turbocharging my search engine or something?
upvoted 0 times
Sarah
1 year ago
D) Increased Search Factor (SF).
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
1 year ago
C) Knowledge Object replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
1 year ago
B) Search affinity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
1 year ago
A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
1 year ago
C) Knowledge Object replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 year ago
Exactly! It helps ensure your searches keep running smoothly even if one search peer goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
1 year ago
A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
1 year ago
Yeah, it's like having multiple engines working together to speed up your searches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
1 year ago
D) Increased Search Factor (SF).
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
1 year ago
C) Knowledge Object replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
1 year ago
B) Search affinity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
1 year ago
A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
1 year ago
C) Knowledge Object replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
1 year ago
B) Search affinity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
1 year ago
A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kiera
1 year ago
I think A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails is a valid use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
1 year ago
Knowledge Object replication? Sounds like a fancy way to share my Sudoku strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
I think search affinity is the key here. Gotta keep those queries local, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
1 year ago
A search head cluster provides redundancy in case a search peer fails. That's a no-brainer!
upvoted 0 times
Delfina
1 year ago
C) Knowledge Object replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
1 year ago
B) Search affinity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
1 year ago
A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 year ago
C) Knowledge Object replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
1 year ago
B) Search affinity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 year ago
A) Provide redundancy in the event a search peer fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel