Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-1003 Exam - Topic 10 Question 74 Discussion

Posted by Jettie on Aug 05, 2023 at 05:03 AM

Which network input option provides durable file-system buffering of data to mitigate data loss due to network outages and splunkd restarts?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium SPLK-1003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
CH
Chaya 11 months ago
Not sure about that, can anyone explain why B is better?
LE
Levi 11 months ago
I agree with B, it’s all about durability!
GI
Giuseppe 11 months ago
Wait, is there really a persistentOueueSize? Sounds weird.
GL
Gladys 11 months ago
I thought it was A, diskQueueSize. Seems like a solid option too.
JA
Jani 12 months ago
Definitely B, durableQueueSize is the way to go!
MA
Madalyn 12 months ago
I feel like queueSize is too general to be the correct answer. I think it has to be one of the more specific options.
JO
Jovita 12 months ago
PersistentQueueSize seems like it could be the right choice, but I can't recall if it was mentioned as a durable option.
HO
Holley 1 year ago
I remember discussing diskQueueSize in class, but I don't think it specifically addresses data loss during outages.
CA
Caitlin 1 year ago
I think the answer might be durableQueueSize, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar from our practice questions.
RA
Rashida 1 year ago
Okay, let me see. I think the key here is to select a global template that is specifically designed for product recommendations. Based on that, I'd say B is the right answer.
NI
Nickolas 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to review the details of the question again and try to identify the core concepts they're testing.
DE
Denae 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I'm pretty sure blocking unwanted traffic is a good idea, so that leans towards option C.
ME
Merrilee 1 year ago
Oh, the indignity of it all. Forced to choose between these meager options. Can't you just give me the answer and spare me the humiliation?
CH
Cherelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
D) queueSize
NI
Nicholle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
C) persistentQueueSize
SA
Samira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
B) durableQueueSize
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
D) queueSize
BU
Bulah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
C) persistentOueueSize
AR
Arlen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
B) durableQueueSize
DO
Dorethea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
A) diskQueueSize
SL
Slyvia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merrilee
A) diskQueueSize
LA
Laine 1 year ago
durableQueueSize? More like 'durable queue of snooze-worthy options', am I right? Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?
LI
Linwood 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laine
Yeah, let's mix it up a bit and go with C) persistentOueueSize for a change.
RA
Raul 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laine
Let's go with A) diskQueueSize, it sounds more exciting!
DO
Donte 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laine
D) queueSize
KI
Kizzy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laine
C) persistentOueueSize
HE
Helga 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laine
B) durableQueueSize
DE
Devora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laine
A) diskQueueSize
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
queueSize? What is this, amateur hour? Get with the program, folks. durableQueueSize is the way to go!
LA
Lashaunda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vilma
I agree, queueSize is not sufficient for mitigating data loss.
AL
Alyssa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vilma
durableQueueSize is definitely the best choice for durability.
TI
Tish 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vilma
I heard persistentQueueSize is more reliable in terms of data buffering.
MI
Micaela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Vilma
diskQueueSize is also a good option to consider.
JO
Josephine 1 year ago
Persistent what now? I'm pretty sure the correct answer is durableQueueSize. That's the only one that makes sense for this scenario.
LE
Leslee 1 year ago
diskQueueSize? Really? That's so 2010. Clearly, the answer is durableQueueSize. It's in the name, people!
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leslee
Yeah, diskQueueSize is outdated.
CR
Crissy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leslee
durableQueueSize is the correct answer.
AN
An 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's either B) durableQueueSize or C) persistentQueueSize.
SA
Samira 1 year ago
I agree with Marylyn, durableQueueSize makes sense to prevent data loss.
KE
Kenneth 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm thinking durableQueueSize sounds like the right option here. Gotta keep that data safe, you know?
MA
Marylyn 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) durableQueueSize.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel