Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-1003 Exam - Topic 10 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1003 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 10
[All SPLK-1003 Questions]

Which network input option provides durable file-system buffering of data to mitigate data loss due to network outages and splunkd restarts?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chaya
6 months ago
Not sure about that, can anyone explain why B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
6 months ago
I agree with B, it’s all about durability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
7 months ago
Wait, is there really a persistentOueueSize? Sounds weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
7 months ago
I thought it was A, diskQueueSize. Seems like a solid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
7 months ago
Definitely B, durableQueueSize is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
7 months ago
I feel like queueSize is too general to be the correct answer. I think it has to be one of the more specific options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
7 months ago
PersistentQueueSize seems like it could be the right choice, but I can't recall if it was mentioned as a durable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
8 months ago
I remember discussing diskQueueSize in class, but I don't think it specifically addresses data loss during outages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
8 months ago
I think the answer might be durableQueueSize, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
8 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think the key here is to select a global template that is specifically designed for product recommendations. Based on that, I'd say B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to review the details of the question again and try to identify the core concepts they're testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I'm pretty sure blocking unwanted traffic is a good idea, so that leans towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
1 year ago
Oh, the indignity of it all. Forced to choose between these meager options. Can't you just give me the answer and spare me the humiliation?
upvoted 0 times
Cherelle
11 months ago
D) queueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
11 months ago
C) persistentQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 months ago
B) durableQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
D) queueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
12 months ago
C) persistentOueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
12 months ago
B) durableQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
12 months ago
A) diskQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
12 months ago
A) diskQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laine
1 year ago
durableQueueSize? More like 'durable queue of snooze-worthy options', am I right? Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
11 months ago
Yeah, let's mix it up a bit and go with C) persistentOueueSize for a change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
11 months ago
Let's go with A) diskQueueSize, it sounds more exciting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
11 months ago
D) queueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
11 months ago
C) persistentOueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
12 months ago
B) durableQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
12 months ago
A) diskQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vilma
1 year ago
queueSize? What is this, amateur hour? Get with the program, folks. durableQueueSize is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Lashaunda
1 year ago
I agree, queueSize is not sufficient for mitigating data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
1 year ago
durableQueueSize is definitely the best choice for durability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 year ago
I heard persistentQueueSize is more reliable in terms of data buffering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
diskQueueSize is also a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josephine
1 year ago
Persistent what now? I'm pretty sure the correct answer is durableQueueSize. That's the only one that makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
1 year ago
diskQueueSize? Really? That's so 2010. Clearly, the answer is durableQueueSize. It's in the name, people!
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
1 year ago
Yeah, diskQueueSize is outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 year ago
durableQueueSize is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
An
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's either B) durableQueueSize or C) persistentQueueSize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
I agree with Marylyn, durableQueueSize makes sense to prevent data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm thinking durableQueueSize sounds like the right option here. Gotta keep that data safe, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) durableQueueSize.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel