Splunk SPLK-1003 Exam - Topic 10 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1003 exam

Question #: 74
Topic #: 10

Which network input option provides durable file-system buffering of data to mitigate data loss due to network outages and splunkd restarts?

AdiskQueueSize

BdurableQueueSize

CpersistentOueueSize

DqueueSize

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Jettie at Aug 05, 2023, 05:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-1003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Chaya

5 months ago

Not sure about that, can anyone explain why B is better?

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

5 months ago

I agree with B, it’s all about durability!

upvoted 0 times

...

Giuseppe

5 months ago

Wait, is there really a persistentOueueSize? Sounds weird.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

5 months ago

I thought it was A, diskQueueSize. Seems like a solid option too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

6 months ago

Definitely B, durableQueueSize is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Madalyn

6 months ago

I feel like queueSize is too general to be the correct answer. I think it has to be one of the more specific options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

6 months ago

PersistentQueueSize seems like it could be the right choice, but I can't recall if it was mentioned as a durable option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Holley

6 months ago

I remember discussing diskQueueSize in class, but I don't think it specifically addresses data loss during outages.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

6 months ago

I think the answer might be durableQueueSize, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar from our practice questions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rashida

6 months ago

Okay, let me see. I think the key here is to select a global template that is specifically designed for product recommendations. Based on that, I'd say B is the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

6 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm going to review the details of the question again and try to identify the core concepts they're testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

6 months ago

I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I'm pretty sure blocking unwanted traffic is a good idea, so that leans towards option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merrilee

11 months ago

Oh, the indignity of it all. Forced to choose between these meager options. Can't you just give me the answer and spare me the humiliation?

upvoted 0 times

Cherelle

10 months ago

D) queueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicholle

10 months ago

C) persistentQueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

10 months ago

B) durableQueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

10 months ago

D) queueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

10 months ago

C) persistentOueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlen

10 months ago

B) durableQueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorethea

10 months ago

A) diskQueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Slyvia

10 months ago

A) diskQueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Laine

11 months ago

durableQueueSize? More like 'durable queue of snooze-worthy options', am I right? Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?

upvoted 0 times

Linwood

10 months ago

Yeah, let's mix it up a bit and go with C) persistentOueueSize for a change.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raul

10 months ago

Let's go with A) diskQueueSize, it sounds more exciting!

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

10 months ago

D) queueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Kizzy

10 months ago

C) persistentOueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

10 months ago

B) durableQueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Devora

10 months ago

A) diskQueueSize

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

12 months ago

queueSize? What is this, amateur hour? Get with the program, folks. durableQueueSize is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

Lashaunda

11 months ago

I agree, queueSize is not sufficient for mitigating data loss.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

11 months ago

durableQueueSize is definitely the best choice for durability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tish

11 months ago

I heard persistentQueueSize is more reliable in terms of data buffering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

11 months ago

diskQueueSize is also a good option to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

12 months ago

Persistent what now? I'm pretty sure the correct answer is durableQueueSize. That's the only one that makes sense for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslee

12 months ago

diskQueueSize? Really? That's so 2010. Clearly, the answer is durableQueueSize. It's in the name, people!

upvoted 0 times

Luisa

11 months ago

Yeah, diskQueueSize is outdated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

11 months ago

durableQueueSize is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

12 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it's either B) durableQueueSize or C) persistentQueueSize.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

12 months ago

I agree with Marylyn, durableQueueSize makes sense to prevent data loss.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm thinking durableQueueSize sounds like the right option here. Gotta keep that data safe, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylyn

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) durableQueueSize.

upvoted 0 times

...