Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-1002 Exam - Topic 9 Question 90 Discussion

When performing a regex field extraction with the Field Extractor (FX), a data type must be chosen before a sample event can be selected. Which of the following data types are supported?
A) index or source and C) index or sourcetype
B) sourcetype or host
D) sourcetype or source

Splunk SPLK-1002 Exam - Topic 9 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1002 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 9
[All SPLK-1002 Questions]

When performing a regex field extraction with the Field Extractor (FX), a data type must be chosen before a sample event can be selected. Which of the following data types are supported?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

In Splunk, when using the chart command, the useother parameter can be set to false (f) to remove the 'OTHER' category, which is a bucket that Splunk uses to aggregate low-cardinality groups into a single group to simplify visualization. Here's how the options break down:

A) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action useother=f This command correctly sets the useother parameter to false, which would prevent the 'OTHER' category from being displayed in the resulting visualization.

B) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action usenull=f useother=t This command has useother set to true (t), which means the 'OTHER' category would still be included, so this is not a correct option.

C) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit=10 useother=f Similar to option A, this command also sets useother to false, additionally imposing a limit to the top 10 results, which is a way to control the granularity of the chart but also to remove the 'OTHER' category.

D) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit-10 This command has a syntax error (limit-10 should be limit=10) and does not include the useother=f clause. Therefore, it would not remove the 'OTHER' category, making it incorrect.

The correct answers to rewrite the syntax to remove the 'OTHER' category are options A and C, which explicitly set useother=f.


by Izetta at Jun 23, 2024, 06:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-1002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Misty
7 months ago
No way, sourcetype and source can't be right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
8 months ago
Wait, are both options really valid?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
8 months ago
I always use index or source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
8 months ago
Definitely sourcetype or host!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
8 months ago
I think it's index or sourcetype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought it was either index or source, but now I’m second-guessing myself after reviewing the materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
9 months ago
I feel like sourcetype is definitely one of the options, but I'm not sure about the other one. Maybe source?
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
9 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question about data types in our last session. Was it index and sourcetype that were mentioned?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
9 months ago
I remember we discussed how the Field Extractor requires specific data types, but I can't quite recall which ones are valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
9 months ago
I'm confident the answer is D - sourcetype or source. The Field Extractor is all about extracting fields from your data, and those data types seem like the most relevant ones to choose from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
9 months ago
Okay, let me see. The question is asking about the data types supported when performing a regex field extraction with the Field Extractor. I believe the correct answer is B - sourcetype or host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know the Field Extractor is used for regex field extraction, but I can't quite remember all the supported data types. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
9 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C - index or sourcetype. That seems like the most logical combination of data types that would be supported for the Field Extractor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
9 months ago
This seems straightforward. The three components are compute, storage, and network. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on my understanding, the "repository.properties" file is where the key repository-level properties are defined, so that would be the single source of truth during monitoring. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
10 months ago
I kind of remember reading about VNet peering, but I'm not sure if it was about bandwidth limitations or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question about message screening, and it mentioned something about XPath injections, too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 year ago
Haha, I'm gonna go with B) sourcetype or host. Just to see if I can stump the test writers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 year ago
You know, I bet the answer is actually A) index or source. That would cover the most common field extraction scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
Ty
1 year ago
Yeah, A) index or source makes sense for the data types supported in regex field extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
1 year ago
I agree, A) index or source would cover a wide range of field extraction needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
1 year ago
I think you're right, A) index or source seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if it's D) sourcetype or source? That would make sense too, right?
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
1 year ago
User 3: I'm not so sure, what if it's D) sourcetype or source?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, that seems like the correct data types for the Field Extractor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 year ago
User 1: I think it's C) index or sourcetype.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
1 year ago
I think it's C) index or sourcetype. That seems to be the most logical choice for a regex field extraction.
upvoted 0 times
Mattie
1 year ago
I believe B) sourcetype or host could also work in certain situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
1 year ago
I've used A) index or source before for regex field extraction and it worked well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
I think it could also be D) sourcetype or source, depending on the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
I agree, C) index or sourcetype makes sense for regex field extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Let's check the documentation for the Field Extractor (FX) to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 year ago
I believe it's sourcetype or host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
I think the supported data types are index or sourcetype.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel